Edinburgh Bookshelf

Kay's Originals Vol. 2

Search

390 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. so nearly balanced were the parties that the latter lost the election by only three votes, there being seventeen for the one, and-fourteen for the other. The result was by no means satisfactory to the immense crowds who thronged the streets. The carriage of the Lord Advocate, from which the horses were unyoked, was drawn by the populace to his own house, with every demonstration of respect; but it required a strong military force to prevent the most serious consequences to his opponents. Disappointed in the metropolis, Mr. Jeffrey was again elected by his former constituents. In 1833, the right of electing having been transferred from the Town Council to the citizens of Edinburgh, by the passing of the Reform Bill, he had the satisfactibn, along with Nr. Abercromby (subsequently speaker of the House of Commons), of being triumphantly returned for his native city. From the known talents and popularity of the Lord Advocate, great expectations were entertained of his appearance in the House of Commons ; but in this the public felt somewhat disappointed. He spoke seldom, and save on one or two occasions, apparently without any effort to distinguish hiIpself He was constant in his attendance, however : and had the honour, in his official capacity, of framing and carrying through two important measures, the Parliamentary and Burgh Reform Eills for Scotland. It is rare that men of purely legal or literary reputation gain by entering the arena of active political life. Erskine and Home Tooke are signal instances. In the case of Jeffrey, besides advanced years, various causes may have contributed to render him careless of Parliamentary popularity. He was no doubt identified as a leading advocate of Reform, and the Edinburgh Review had long been considered the organ of the Whigs ; but there was a third party to be satisfied, with whose ultra views he had probably little sympathy, and still less inclination to become their champion. In the estimation of this class of politicians, the Lord Advocate failed to realise the expectations that had been formed of him ; and some of the journals of the period indulged with considerable freedom of remark on his political sins, at least those of omission, for they were after all, on their own showing, chiefly of a negative description. The short Parliamentary career of Mr. Jeffrey terminated on his elevation to the Scottish behch in 1834. On quitting his political position, even the ultra portion of the press .was constrained to acknowledge that he returned “to his native city with perfectly clean hands, for his upright and honourable nature scorned jobbing on his own account ;” yet a more direct and truly gratifying approval of his public conduct awaited him. Before leaving London, he had the singular honour of being invited to a public dinner, given him by a majority of the members for Scotland. But it is not in reference to politics alone, however great may have been the influence of his political writings, that the character of Lord Jeffrey is to be estimated. Even apart from the eminence he attained as a barrister, his connection with the Edinburgh Review, and the literature of the last forty years, must carry his name down to posterity in honourable association with the most distinguished of his time. As a Reviezcer he maintained the reputa
Volume 9 Page 521
  Shrink Shrink   Print Print