Edinburgh Bookshelf

Kay's Originals Vol. 1

Search

43G BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. No. CLXVIII. GEORGE MEALMAKER, AUTHOR OF THE ‘‘ NORAL AND POLITICAL CATECHISJI OF NAN.” GEORGE was an extensive weaver in the Seagate of Dundee, at a period when the giant power of steam had not come into competition with the hand-loom. Unfortunately for himself, he became deeply infected with the political spirit of the times; and in 1796, from his superior capacity acquired the distinction of a leading member of one of those societies of “ United Scotsmen,” formed at that period in various parts of Scotland, ‘‘ particularly in the counties of Fife, Forfar, and Perth.” The object of these associations was ostensibly the attainment of annual parliaments and universal suffrage; but they were conducted in a manner unwarrantable by law-by means of signs and oaths of secrecy. Mealmaker was charged not only with having taken the test of secrecy himself, but with having administered the oath to others, and with being otherwise active in promoting the extension of what was then considered an illegal combination. He was also accused of having circulated various “ seditious and inflammatory papers or pamphlets,” particularly “the Moral and Political Catechism of Man ; or, a Dialogue between a Citizen of the World and an Inhabitant of Britain,” to which was added a narrative of his arrest, examination, and imprisonment, written by himself, and printed by T. M‘Cleish. The trial took place at the High Court of Justiciary, on the 10th January 1’198. Mr. Clerk and hlr. White spoke for the prisoner; and the Solicitor-General and Mr. Burnett for the Crown. On proof being led, the existence of the societiestheir dividing into other bodies, when the members became numerous-their signs, countersigns, committees of secrecy, etc., as set forth in the indictment, were fully proven by the witnesses, one of whom was committed to prison for prevarication upon oath. After the Lord Advocate had addressed the jury on the part of the Crown, and Mr. Clerk for the prisoner, the evidence was summed up by Lord Eskgrove, when the jury were enclosed a little before four in the morning. Next day they unanimously returned a verdict of guilty ; and the pannel was sentenced to fourteen years’ transportation. On receiving sentence the prisoner addressed the Court, and blamed the jury for precipitancy, having taken only half an hour to consider the verdict. He said “he was to be another victim to Parliamentary Reform ; but he could easily submit, and go to that distant country where others had gone before him. With regard to his wife Edinburgh, 1797. The pleadings on the relevancy lasted nearly four hours. 12mo.
Volume 8 Page 592
  Shrink Shrink   Print Print