Edinburgh Bookshelf

Kay's Originals Vol. 2

Search

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 413 accordingly, not a few pleasantries were indulged in at the expense of the youthful Principal.’ Time, however, altered the character of the arrangement. Fortunately the Professors of this University possess nothing of the undesirable privilege of patronage, yet they cannot but look with much interest on the choice which the patrons are from time to time called upon to make in filling up vacancies in their fraternity; and their opinions of the candidates when expressed, as they generally are, go far to sway that choice. In this indirect manner, Principal Baird was always observed to act purely for the good of the institution-sometimes very happily for the encouragement of merit, and with great credit to his own courage and discernment. Of this description was the part he took in recommending Dr. Murray to the Chair of Oriental Languages. The wondrous attainments of that scholar were in the strongest contrast to almost everything in his early lot; and, though such a character has within itself a strong principle of ascent in society, there is always much honour due to the befriending hand. Principal Baird‘s exertions in this matter are thus alluded to by the late Sir Henry Moncreiff :- ‘‘ It would be unjust not to mention, with the respect which it deserves, that, in his election to the Professorship, Dr. Murray was most particularly indebted to Dr. Baird, the Principal of the University. He had been uniformly his most zealous friend from his first appearpce in Edinburgh ; and, down to the period of his election aa a professor, seems not to have lost any opportunity of assisting and befriending him. On this occasion he exerted himself most effectually to render his election secure ; and did so, from his conviction of his peculiar qualifications, in opposition both to his personal and his party friends, with a firmness and consistency which certainly did him honour with all impartial men. “Dr. Murray was not a man to forget his obligations to any one individual to whom he had been indebted, and least of all to forget what he owed to Dr. Baird, who had so long and so effectually patronised him. ” The Senatus Acadeinicus of the University is known to number among its offices the duty of maintaining College discipline. It is a duty seldom requisite in its severer aspect. There is, however, one instance of academic authority, which Principal Baird was called upon to exercise, and which is yet remembered in consequence of the distinction of the parties concerned. The offence, we believe, consisted in the circumstance of sending a challenge to one of the Professors. The parties summoned before the Senate to answer for this misdemeanour were Lord Henry Petty (afterwards Marquis of Landsdowne), the late Francis Horner, M.P., and Mr. (afterwards Lord) Brougham. The last only appeared ; and the rebuke was at once so administered and so received, that a friendship ensued which was kept up ever afterwards betwixt the parties. The Principal was of course not aware of the future distinction to be attained by the personage so leniently reproved; but he knew, even then, that the youth was shaping himself after antiquity, and might yet be “un hornme de Plutarch. ” Dr, Baird found leisure to employ himself much in the direction of the 1 Dr. Baird had married a daughter of Provost Elder, who consequently deemed it right to exert his influence in favour of one so nearly related to him. Hence the playful allusion of the artist- “ The Elder shall serve the younger. ”
Volume 9 Page 552
  Shrink Shrink   Print Print