. I64 OLD AND NEW EDINBURGH. [Leith.
*
LElTH WALK, FROM GAYFIELD SQUARE, LOOKING SOUTH.
CHAPTER XVII.
LEITH-HISTORICAI, SURVEY.
Origih of the Nme?-Boundariee of South and North Leith-Links of Nor& Leith-The Tom first mentioned in History-King Robert?e Charter
-Superiority of the Logam and Magistrates of Ediuburgh-Abbot Ballantyne?s Bridge and Chapel-Newhaven given to Edinburgh by
Jarnes 1V.-The Port of I53c-The Town Burned by the English.
LEITH, the sea-port of Edinburgh, lies between it
and the Firth of Forth, but, though for Parliamentary
purposes separate from it, it is to all intents an
integral portion of the capital city. Of old the
name was variously written, Leyt, Let, Inverleith,
and the mouth of the Leith, and it is said to have
been derived from the family of the first recorded
proprietors or superiors, the Leiths, who in the reign
of Alexander 111. owned Restalrig and many extensive
possessions in Midlothian, till the superiority
passed by the marriage of the last of the
Leiths into the family of the Logans. However,
?it seems much more probable that the family took
their name from the river, which has its rise in the
parish of Cume, at Kinleith, where three springs
receive various additions in their progress, particularly
at the village of Balerno, where they are joined
hy the Bavelaw Bum.
This stream, when its waters were pure, abounded
in fish-trout, loche or groundling, and the nine
eyed-eel Or river lamprey; and it must have contained
salmon too, as in the Edinburgh HeraZd for
August, 1797, we read of a soldier in the Caledonian
Regiment being drowned in the Salmon
Pool, in the Water of Leith, by going beyond his
depth when bathing there.
In his ? Historical Inquiries,? Sir Robert Sibbald
suggests that a Roman station of some kind existed
where Leith now stands ; but it has been deemed
more probable, as the author of CaZedonia Rqnana
supposes, that from the main Roman road that went
to Caer-almon (or Cramond) a path diverged by
the outlying camp at Sheriff Hall to Leith, where
Chalmers (? Caledonia,? Vol., I.), records that ?the
remains of a Roman way were discovered, when
one of the piers was being repaired ; I? and this is
further supported by the fact that some Roman
remains were found near the citadel in 1825, Still,