Edinburgh Bookshelf

Edinburgh Bookshelf

Search

Index for “Royal Edinburgh Volunteers”

THE Castle Hill,? says Dr. Chambers, ? is partly ?
an esplanade, serving as a parade ground for the
garrison, and partly a street, the upper portion of
that vertebral line which, under the names of Lawnbeen
characterised as ? hovels that are a disgrace
to Europe.?
In lists concerning the Castle of Edinburgh,
the first governor appears to have been Thomas de
Cancia in I 147 ; the first constable, David Kincaid
of Coates House, in 1542 ; and the first State prisoner
warded therein Thomas of. Colville in 12 10,
for conspiring against William the Lion.
We may fittingly take leave of the grand old
?( Archzologia Scotica,? which contains an ? Elegie
on the great and famous Blew Stone which lay on
the Castle Hill, and was interred there.? On this
relic, probably a boulder, a string of verses form ,
Castle in the fine lines of Burns?s ?Address to
Edinburgh ? :-
~ ? There, watching high the least alarms,
Thy rough, rude fortress gleams afar;
Like some bold ver?ran, grey in arms,
And marked with many a seamy scar ;
The pond?rous wall and massy bar,
Grim rising o?er the rugged rock,
Have oft withstood assailing war,
And oft repelled th? invader?s shock.?
market, High Street, and Canongate, extends to I the doggerel elegy :-
Holyrood Palace f but
it is with the Esplanade
and banks we have
chiefly to deal at
present.
Those who now see
the Esplanade, a peaceful
open space, 5 10 feet
in length by 300 in
breadth,with the squads
of Highland soldiers at
drill, or the green bank
that slopes away to the
north, covered with
beautiful timber, swarming
in summer with little
ones in care of their
nurses, can scarcely
realise that thereon
stood the ancient Spur,
before which so many
men have perished
RUNIC CROSS, CASTLE BANK.
sword in hand, and that it was the arena of so
many revolting executions by the axe and stake,
for treason, hereay, and sorcery.
It lay in a rough state till 1753, when the earth
taken from the foundations of the Royal Exchange
\vas spread over it, and the broad flight of forty
steps which gave access to the drawbridge was
buried. The present ravelin before the half-moon
was built in 1723 ; but alterations in the level must
have taken place prior to that, to judge from
?Our old Blew Stone, that?s
His marrow may not be;
Large, twenty feet in length
His bulk none e?er did
Doiir and dief, and run with
When he preserved men.
Behind his back a batterie
Contrived with packs of
Let?s now think on, since
We ?re in the Castle?s
dead and gone,
he was,
ken ;
grief,
was,
woo,
he is gone,
view.?
The woolpacks evidently
refer to the siege
of 1689.
The Esplanade was
impraved in 1816 by a
parnpet and railing on
the north. and a fea
years after by a low mall on the south, strengthened
by alternate towers and turrets. A bronze statue of
the Duke of York and Albany, K.G., holding his
marshal?s b%ton, was erected on the north side in
1839, and a little lower down are two Celtic memorial
crosses of remarkable beauty. The larger and
more ornate of them was erected in 1862, by the
officers and soldiers of the 78th Ross-shire Highlanders,
to the memory of their comrades who fell
during the revolt in India in 1857-8 j and the ... Castle Hill,? says Dr. Chambers, ? is partly ? an esplanade, serving as a parade ground for the garrison, and ...

Book 1  p. 79
(Score 0.28)

THE STUARTS TO THE DEATH OF JAMES 111. 15
age was exercised to devise more novel and exquisite tortures to satisfy the indignation of
the people. The sderings of the Earl of Athol were prolonged through three days ; on
the second of which he was elevated on a pillar at the cross, to the gaze of the people, and
with a hot iron coronet, crowned in derision as the King of Traitors. On the third day,
he was dragged on a hurdle through the High Street to the place of public execution,
where, after further indignities, he was at length beheaded, and his head exposed on a pole
at the cross-the body being quartered and sent to the four chief towns of the kingdom.
With the like barbarous indignities, Robert Graham, the most active of the regicides,
suffered at the same time and place.
Bneas Sylvius, who afterwards filled the papal chair as Pope Pius 11.) was at this time
resident in Edinburgh, as the Pope’s nuncio for Scotland, and witnessed, as Abercromby
says, ‘‘ with some horror, but more admiration,” The remark of the
Italian ecclesiastic, ‘( that he was at a loss to determine whether the crime of the regicides,
or the punishment inacted on them by the justice of the nation, was the greatest ”-would
not seem to imply any censure on the bloody revenge with which the Scottish Capital thus
expressed her indignation on the murderers of her King.
King James 11. was not above seven years old, when the officers of state called a
Parliament in his name, which accordingly met at Edinburgh on the 20th of March 1438.
Their fist act was the condemnation, already recorded, of the regicides ; and thereafter, the
youthful Sovereign was brought from the Castle, where he had been lodged since shortly
after his birth, attended by the three estates of the kingdom ; and being conducted in state
to Holyrood Abbey, was there crowned with great magnificence-the first of the Scottish
Kings that is thus united, in birth and royal honours, with the capital of the kingdom.
During the two succeeding years, he continued to reside entirely in the Castle, under
custody of the Chancellor Crichton, greatly to the displeasure of the Queen and her party,
who thus found him placed entirely beyond their control. She accordingly visited Edinburgh,
professing great friendship for the Chancellor, and a longing desire to see her son; by which
means she completely won the goodwill of the old statesman, and obtained ready access,
with her retinue, to visit the Prince in the Castle, and take up her abode there. At length
having lulled all suspicion, she gave out that she had made a vow to pass in pilgrimage to
the White Kirk of Brechin, for the health of her son ;’ and bidding adieu to the Chancellor
over night, with many earnest recommendations of the young King to his fidelity and care,
she retired to her devotions, having to depart at early dawn on the ensuing morrow. Immediately
on being left at liberty, the King was cautiously pinned up among the linen and
furniture of his mother, and so conveyed in a chest to Leith, and from thence by water to
Stirling, into the hands of Sir Archibald Livingstone. h e d i a t e l y thereafter, the latter
raised an army and laid siege to the Chancellor in the Castle of Edinburgh ; but the wary
statesman, having lost the control of the King, wisely effected a compromise with his
opponent, and delivering the keys into the King’s own hands, they both supped with him
the same night in the Castle, and, on the following day, he confirmed the one in his oEce
of Chancellor, and the other in that of guardian of his person. This state of af€airs did
not continue long, however, for Sir Archibald Livingstone having quarrelled with the
Queen, the King was shortly afterwards again carried off and restored to the guardianship
these executions.
Martial Achievements, vol. ii. p. 310. ’ Lindsay of Pitscottie, vol. i. p. 7. ... STUARTS TO THE DEATH OF JAMES 111. 15 age was exercised to devise more novel and exquisite tortures to satisfy ...

Book 10  p. 16
(Score 0.28)

?4 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
Queen’ Mary had ever been present at the Assembly of the Estates, and its proceedings
were conducted with unusual pomp. The Queen rode in procession to the Tolbooth, in
robes of state, with the crown, sceptre, and sword borne before her, escorted by a brilliant
cavalcade, and was hailed with loyal greetings as she passed along the High Street,
The hall was crowded with the nobles and other members, in their most costly habiliments,
and glit,tered with the gay trappings of the royal household, and the splendour
and beauty of the Court, that surrounded the throne. The Queen opened the proceedings
with an address which won the favour of her audience, no less than her extreme beauty,
so that the people were heard to exclaim, Did ever orator
speak so sweetly?” On three succeeding days she rode thus to the Tolbooth, greatly to
the dissatisfaction of the preachers, who spoke boldly “ against the superfluities of their
clothes,” and at length presented articles for regulating apparel and reforming other
similar enormities.’
It may be mentioned, as characteristic of the times, that the Town Council, “ for the
satisfaction of many devout citizens, and to prevent the crime of fornication,” enacted,
about the same period, that all guilty of this crime should be ducked in a certain part
of the North Loch, then an impure pond of stagnant water, and a pillar was erected
there for the more efficient execution of such sentences. The punishment, however, was
not always reserved for such carnal offenders, but was also enforced against the moat
zealous adherents of the ancient faith. In the month of August, a serious disturbance
occurred, in consequence of the Queen’s domestics at Holyrood being found, during her
absence at Stirling, attending mass at the chapel there. Patrick Cranston, “ a zealous
brother,” as Knox styles him, entered the chapel, and finding the altar covered, and
R priest ready to celebrate mass, he demanded of them how they dared thus openly to
break the laws of the land? The magistrates were summoned, and peace restored with
difficulty.
A much more serious display of popular intolerance was exhibited in the year 1565.
The period appointed by the ministers of the Congregation for the celebration of the comregarded
as a peculiar aggravation of the crime of “ massing,’’ when it was done at the
same time as they were administering the sacrament, the indignation of the reformers
was greatly excited by the customary services of the Roman Catholics at this period.
A party of them, accordingly, headed by one of the bailies, seized on Sir James Tarbat, a
Catholic priest, as he was riding home, after officiating at the altar. He was imprisoned
in the Tolbooth, along with several of his assistants; but the populace, not content to
abide the course of law, brought him forth, clothed in his sacerdotal garments, and with
the chalice secured in his hand. He was placed on the pillory at the Market Cross, and
exposed for an hour to the pelting of the rude rabble ; the boys serving him, according to
Knox, with his Easter eggs. He was brought to trial with his assistants on the following
day, and convicted of having celebrated mass, contrary to law. He was again exposed for
four hours on the pillory, under the charge of the common hangman, and ao rudely
treated that he was reported to be dead.
The Queen, justly exasperated at this cruel and insulting proceeding, sent to her friends
God save that sweet face I
. muuion chanced to fall at the season of Easter, and as it seems to have been at all times
.
a Rnox’a Hist., p. 295. Keith, voL ii. p. 199. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. Queen’ Mary had ever been present at the Assembly of the Estates, and its ...

Book 10  p. 81
(Score 0.28)

26 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES.
continued with great spirit till near two in the morning, when the company sat down to a most
elegant supper, in four different rooms, where they were served with a profusion of the best wines,
and a most superb dessert. After supper, the dancing recommenced with redoubled vigour, and
w a continued till an hour after sunrising.”
In 1806, when the Opposition came into power, Lord Moira was appointed
Master-General of the Ordnance. In 1810 he was nominated Governor of the
Charter-house. The Earl being generally popular, and having zealously exerted
himself in favour of the Prince of Wales, when the parliamentary inquiry into
his financial embarrassments was going on, he thus stood high in the favour of
the Regent. Accordingly, on the assassination of Mr. Percival in 1812, he was
empowered by his Royal Highness to form a new Ministry. With this view
Lord Grey, Grenville, Erskine, etc., were consulted by his lordship ; but, as is
well known, the proposed arrangements came to nothing.
Soon after this the Prince Regent conferred the Order of the Garter on the
Earl; and in 1813 his lordship was appointed Governor-General and Commander-
in-Chief of the forces of British India. He remained nins years in the
East ; and during that period brought two important wars to a satisfactory conclusion,
and managed affairs with the utmost credit to himself and advantage to
the country. As a reward for his services, he was created (on the 7th December
1816) Viscount Loudon, Earl of Rawdon, and Marquis of Hastings, and twice
received the thanks of the Court of Directors of the East India Company, as
well as ’of both Houses of Parliament. In consequence of ill health the Earl
was recalled, at his own desire, in 1822. He returned to England, but without
having enriched himself by his long residence in a country wThich had proved a
source of wealth to his predecessor. During the summer of 1823, his lordship
and family paid a short visit to Loudon Castle,’ their residence in Ayrshire,
This affair gave rise to much local speculation at the time. In a small volume of poems, by
John Ramsay, Kilmarnock, 1836, the event is celebrated in a poem of some length, entitled “ Hope
and Despair ; or, the Loudon Campaign.” In this burlesque effusion the poet satirises his military
townsmen without mercy. In a prefatory note he says- “If half that old Fame detailed of the
preparations made at Loudon for their entertainment was true, such a slaughter had not taken place
since the dedication of Solomon’s Temple. Many went from feelings of respect to the noble veteran ;
others, whose sentiments we had an opportunity of knowing, were attracted by somethiug of a very
different nature; and some had even promised to use their influence to get their friends and
acquaintances introduced to be sharers of the spoil.” It appears that Fame had indeed prodigiously
magnified the “preparations made at Loudon ;” and it is on the well-merited disappointment which
“the guzzlers” experienced that the humour of the poet hinges.
“ Slow murmuring hameward cam’ the squad,
Their bellies swamp, their hearts richt sad ;
The very Major swore-‘By G-d,
And brocht a stain and odium bad,
It wa9 a shame,
On Hastings’ name.’
“ The drummer raised his plaintive wail,
The rocks gave back the doleful tale j
Yea, and the sober evening gale
That swept alang,
Bore far away, o’er hill and dale,
The mournful saug.” ... BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. continued with great spirit till near two in the morning, when the company sat down to a ...

Book 9  p. 35
(Score 0.28)

234 MEMORIAL$ OF BDINBURGH.
we have now to describe, is understood to be still standing in the nether regions of the I
Royal Exchange area.
From Professor Sinclair’s veracious narrative, it appears that Mr Thomas Coltheart, a
respectable law agent, removed from a lower part of the town to a better house in Mary
King’s Close. The maid-servant was warned by the neighbour3 of its being haunted on
her first coming about the house, and became so intimidated that she deserted her place,
leaving Mr Coltheart and his wife alone in their new dwelling, to defy the devil and his
minions as they best might. The good lady had seated herself beside her husband’s bedwho
had lain down on the Sunday afternoon, being slightly indisposed-and was engaged
in reading the Bible, when happening to lift her eye, she was appalled by beholding a head,
seemingly that of an old man with a grey beard, suspended in mid air at a little distance,
and gazing intently on her. She swooned at the sight, and lay in a state of insensibility
till the return of her neighbours from church. Her husband, on being told of the apparition,
sought to reason her out of her credulity, and the evening passed over without further
trouble ; but they were not long gone to bed when he himself spied the same phantom-head,
b i the light of the fire, gazing at him with its ghastly eyes. He rose and lighted a candle,
and took to prayer, but with little effect; for in about an hour the bodiless phantom was
joined by that of a child also suspended in mid air, and this again was followed by a naked
arm from the elbow downwards, which, in defiance of all adjurations and prayers, not only
persisted in remaining, but seemed bent on shaking hands with them. The poor agent in
the most solemn manner addressed this very friendly but unwelcome intruder, engaging to
do his utmost to right any wrongs it had received, if it would only begone, but all in
vain. The goblins evidently considered that the worthy couple, and not they, were the
intruders. They persisted in making themselves at home; though after all they seem
to have been civil enough ghosts, with no unfriendly intentions, so that they were only
allowed the run of the house. By and by the naked arm was joined by a spectral dog,
which deliberately mounted a chair, and turning its nose to its tail, went to sleep. This
was followed by a cat, and soon after by other and stranger creatures, until the whole floor
swarmed with them, so that “ the honest couple went to their knees again within the bed;
there being no standing in the floor of the room. In the time of prayer, their ears were
startled with a deep, dreadful, and loud groan, as of a strong man dying, at which all the
apparitions and visions at once vaniahed I ”
Mr Coltheart must have been a man of no ordinary courage, or this night’s experience
would have satisfied him to resign his new house to the devil, or his subtenants, who seemed
to have taken a previous lease of it. He continued to reside there till his death without
further molestation ; but at the very moment he expired, a gentleman whose law-agent and
intimate friend he was, being in his house at Tranent-a small town about ten miles
from Edinburgh-was awoke while asleep ia bed there with his wife, by the nurse, who
was affrighted by something like a cloud moving about the room. While the gentleman
got hold of his sword to defend himself and them against this unwonted visitor, the cloud
gradually assumed the form of a man. ‘‘At last the apparition looked him fully and
perfectly in the face, and stood by him with a ghostly and pale countenance.” The gentleman
recognised his friend Thomas Coltheart, and demanded of him if he was dead, and
what was his errand? Whereat the ghost held up his hand three times, shaking it towards ... MEMORIAL$ OF BDINBURGH. we have now to describe, is understood to be still standing in the nether regions of ...

Book 10  p. 255
(Score 0.28)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. i l
The foreign correspondence of Sir John was extensive. The fame of his
works, and the intimacies he had formed during his tours, created great demands
on his time. He held no less than twenty-five diplomas from institutions in
France, Flanders, Prussia, Austria, Saxony, Wurtemberg, Germany, Sweden,
Denmark, Russia, Italy, the United States, and the West Indies. With Presidents
Washington, Jefferson, and Adams he had frequent and interesting communications,
as well as with almost every person of note in the old world;
while few foreigners of any distinction visited Scotland without letters of introduction
to him.
“ In person, Sir John Sinclair was tall and spare ; and even in his advanced
years he was remarkable for the elasticity of his gait and erect carriage. From
his characteristic orderly habits, he was exceedingly neat in his dress ; and he
is said to have been, in youth, distinguished for his manly beauty. In the
private walks of life, and in the exercise of the domestic virtues, he was a perfect
model of the Christian gentleman, and with perhaps as few of the faults and
frailties inherent in poor human nature, as almost ever falls to the share of an
individual. He set a noble example to the world of intellectual activity
uniformly directed from almost boyhood to extreme old age.”’
NO. cxcm.
LORD STONEFIELD.
JOHN CAMPBELL, son of Archibald Campbell, Esq., of Stohefield, many years
Sheriff-Depute of the shires of Argyle and Bute, was admitted to the bar in
1748, and elevated to the bench in 1762, when he assumed the title of Lord
Stonefield. In 1787 he succeeded Lord Gardenstone as a Lord of Justiciary.
This latter appointment he resigned in 1702, but he retained his seat on the
bench till his death, which took place upon the 19th of June 1801, having
By his first marriage, Sir John had two daughters-Hannah, authoress of a popular work on
the principles of Christ@ faith, and whose memoirs are well known ; and Janet, married to the
late Sir James Colquhoun of Luss, Baronet. By his second he had a large family-leaving at his
death, the Hon. Lady Sinclair with six sons and five daughters. The eldest, Sir George, was, during
twenty-six years, Member of Parliament for the county of Caithness ; Alexander, formerly of the
H.EI.C.S., resided in Edinburgh ; John, M.A. and F.R.S.E., author of “Dissertations Vindicating
the Church of England ”-an “ Essay on Church Patronage ’I-“ Memoirs of the Life and Works
of Sir John Sinclair,” etc., was one of the ministers of St. Paul’s Chapel, York Place ; Archibald,
a Captain in the Royal Navy ; William, Rector of Pulborough ; and Godfrey, the youngest son, was
for some time engaged in the office of a Writer to the Signet. Of the danghtem, one married George
fourth Earl of Glasgow ; another Stair Stewart, Esq., of Glasserton and Phpgill ; and Misses Diana,
Margaret, and Catherine, remained unmarried. The last-named, Catherine, was the well-known
authoress of “ Scotland and the Scotch,” “ Modern Accomplishments,” and numerous other works.
She died in 1864, and a monument waa erected to her memory in St. Colme Street, Edinburgh.
1 John, afterwards Archdeacon of Middlesex and Vicar of Kensington, NBS the author of “Sketches of Old
Times and Distant Places,” published in 1875, in which year he also died. ... SKETCHES. i l The foreign correspondence of Sir John was extensive. The fame of his works, and the ...

Book 9  p. 94
(Score 0.28)

YAMES VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES II. 85
when the siege commenced, and all further supplies were then completely cut off; yet he
held out gallantly for thirty-three days, until reduced to the last extremities, and.
threatened with the desertion and mutiny of his men. The garrison did not despair until
the besiegers had got possession of the spur, within which was the well on which they
mainly depended for water. This battery stood on the Esplanade, nearest the town, as may
be seen in the view given at the head of Chapter III., and was demolished in the year
1649, by order of the Committee of Estates.
, Holinshed mentions also the spring at the Well-house Tower, under the name of “ St
Margaret’e Well, without the Castle, on the north side,” by which some of the garrison
suffered, owing to its being poisoned by the enemy.
The only well that remained within the Castle was completely choked up with the
ruins, and so great was the general devastation, that when a parley was demanded, the
messenger had to be lowered. over the walls by a rope.’ The brave commander was
delivered up by the English General to the vindictive power of the Regent, and he and
-his brother James, along with two burgesses of the city, were ignominiously ‘‘ harlit in
cartis bakwart” to the Cross of Edinburgh, and there hanged and quarteredY4 and
their heads exposed upon the Castle wall.’
The Regent put the Castle into complete repair, and committed the keeping of it to
his brother, George Douglas of Parkhead. He was at the same time Provost of the city,
though he was speedily thereafter deprived of the latter o%c& Morton was now firmly
established in the Regency, and he immediately proceeded to such acts of rapacity and
injustice as rendered his government odious to the whole nation ; until the nobles at last
united with the people in deposing him. He succeeded, however, in speedily regaining
sufficient influence to Secure the cufitody of the King’s person.
The loyalty which the citizens of Edinburgh displayed at various times, until the
King’s full assumption of the reins of government, obtained from him epecial acknowledgments
of gratitude. In 1578, one hundred of their choicest young men were well
accoutred and sent to Stirling as a royal guard’ They sent him also, at a later period,
costly gifts of plate, though they remonstrated, with considerable decision, when he
attempted to interfere with their right of election of Magistrates ; apologising, at the same
time, for not sending the bailies to assign their reasons to him personally, because two
of them were absent, and (‘ the thrid had his wyfe redy to depart furth of this warld.”
The King at length summoned a Parliament to assemble at Edinburgh in October
1579, and made his first public entry into his capital. He was received at the West Port
by the Magistrates, under a pall of purple velvet ; and an allegory of King Solomon
with the twa wemen,” was exhibited as a representation of the wisdom of Solomon ; after
which the sword and sceptre were presented to him. At the ancient gate in the West BOW,
the keys of the city were given him in a silver basin with the usual device of a Cupid
descending from a globe, while (4 Dame Music and hir scollars exercisit hir art with great
melodie.” At the Tolbooth, he was received by three gallant virtuous ladies, to wit, Peace,
Plenty, and Justice, who harangued him in the Greek, Latin, and Scotch languages; and,
as he approached St Giles’s Church, Dame Religion showed herself, and in the Nebrm
1 Bannatyne Misc. vol., ii. p. 76. Diurnal of Occuaents, p. 535.
Idid, p. 37.
’ Hkt. of James the Sext., p. 145.
Maitland, p. 36. ... VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES II. 85 when the siege commenced, and all further supplies were then completely ...

Book 10  p. 93
(Score 0.28)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 299
He was also connected with several literary and theological societies formed
among his fellow-students; and was a member of the Newtonian Society, instituted
in 1760, which for several years continued to meet weekly in one of the
rooms of the College, and which may be said to have been the precursor of the
present Royal Society of Edinburgh.
He was
at the time very young, and not sufficiently practised in the art of literary condensation.
When it came to his turn to produce an essay for the evening, he
had entered so sincerely and fully upon the subject that he appeared at the
forum with an immense bundle of papers under his arm, and commenced by
stating that his discourse consisted of twelve different parts ! This announcement
alarmed the preses for the night so much, that he interrupted him by
declaring that he had twelve distinct objections to the production of such a mass
of manuscripts. The preses accordingly stated his twelve reasons, and was followed
on the same side by six other members, who prefaced their observations
by a similar declaration, During this opposition the temper of the young theologian
remained unruffled ; and it was not till the last speaker had finished his
oration that he took up his papers, and, without deigning to reply, walked out
of the room.
In 1770 Dr. Hunter was presented to the New Church of Dumfries, and
soon afterwards became the purchaser of the estate of Barjarg in that county,
which had previously belonged to James Erskine of Barjarg and Alva-one of
the Senators of the College of Justice. He remained at Dumfries for nine years,
and was much esteemed by all classes of the community.
In 1779 he was presented to the New Greyfriars’ Church, Edinburgh; and
whilst there was appointed the colleague of Dr. Hamilton (father to the late
eminent physician), in the Divinity Professorship of the University ; and, until
the death of that gentleman, continued to teach his class without any remuneration.
In 1786 he was translated by the Magistrates to the Tron Church, where
he became associated with Dr. Drysdalel-a clergyman much esteemed for his
Dr. Drysdale, whose presentation to Lady Yester’s Church made much noise in Edinburgh, was
a native of Kirkcaldy. He received his early education at the village school taught by Mr. David
Miller, and was the intimate associate of Dr. Adam Smith, Janies Oswald of Dunnikier, and several
other distinguished men, to whom Mr. Miller had the honour of imparting instruction. Dr. Drysdale
waq presented to Lady Yester’s Church by the Town Council in 1763. For some time prior, the
election of ministers for the city having been allowed to remain with the general sessions, the resumption
of power by the Council in this instance gave rise to much cavil and commotion. A civil process
w &t~he consequence, which was ultimately decided in favour of the corporation. Notwithstanding
the unpleasant circumstances connected with his presentation, the great talents and natural
eloquence of Dr. Drysdale, together with his known character as a man, soon rendered him a popular
minister. In 1766, he was still farther honoured by the Town Council, in being translated to the
Tron Church on the death of Dr. Jardine. Dr. Drysdale was much esteemed by his brethren ; and.
in 1773, was chosen Moderator of the General Assembly. In the affairs of this court he took an
adive interest ; and was the steady supporter of his friend Dr. Robertson, on the moderate side.
In conjunction with his venerable colleague Dr. Wishart, he was appointed Clerk to the Court ic
1778 ; and, in 1784, had the peculiar honour of bcing a second time solicited to be put in nomina-
An anecdote is told of Dr. Hunter in connection with this Society. ... SKETCHES. 299 He was also connected with several literary and theological societies formed among his ...

Book 8  p. 419
(Score 0.28)

78 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
buildings often before used as a royal residence, and in one of the apartments of which
the Queen Regent, Mary of Guise, expired only six years previous,
The greatest joy and triumph prevailed in Edinburgh on the announcement of the
birth of an heir to the throne. A public thanksgiving was offered up on the following day
in St Giles’s Church; aud Sir James Melvil posted with the news to the English Court,
with such speed, that he reached London on the fourth day thereafter, and spoiled her
Majesty’s mirth for one night, at least, with the “happy news.’’’
The birth of a son to Darnley produced little change on his licentious course of life.
By his folly he had already alienated from him the intersets and affections of every party;
and the conspirators, who had joined with him in ‘the murder of Rizzio, had already
resolved on his destruction, when he was seized with the small-pox at Glasgow. From
this he was removed to Edinburgh, and lodged in the mansion of the Provost or chief
prebendary of the Collegiate Church of St Mary-in-the-Fields, as a place of good air.
This house stood nearly on the site of the present north-west corner of Drummond Street,
as is ascertained from Gordon’s map of the city in 1647, where the ruins are indicated as
they existed at that period : it is said to have been selected by Sir James Balfour, brother
of the Provost, and “ the most corrupt man of his age,” a as well fitted, from its lonely
situation, for the intended murder.
She spent the evening of the 9th of
February 1567 with him, and only left at eleven o’clock, along with several nobles who
had accompanied her there, to be present at an entertainment at Holyrood House.
The Earl of Bothwell, whose lawless ambition mainly instigated the assassination, had
‘obtained a situation for one of his mehals in the Queen’s service, and by this means he
was able to obtain the keys of the Provost of St Mary’s house, and cause counterfeit
impressions to be taken.s He had been in company with the Queen on the loth, at a
banquet given to her by the Bishop of Argyle, and learning that she must return to Holyrood
that night, he immediately arranged to complete his murderous scheme.
’ Bothwell left the lodgings of the Laird of Ormiston in company with several of his own
servants, who were his sole accomplices, shortly after nine o’clock at night. They passed
down the Blackfriars’ Wynd together, entering the gardens of the Dominican monastery by
a gate in the enclosing wall opposite the foot of the Wynd; and by a road nearly on the
site of what now forms the High School Wynd, they reached the postern in the town wall
which gave admission to the lodging of Darnley. Bothwell joined the Queen, who was
then visiting her husband, while his accomplices were busy arranging the gunpowder in
the room below ; and, after escorting her home to the Palace, he returned to complete his
purpose. It may be further mentioned, as an evidence of the simple manners of the period,
that when Bothwell’s servants returned to his residence, near the Palace, after depositing
the powder in Darnley’P lodging, they saw the Queen,-as one of them afterwards Ptated
in evidence,-on her way back to Holyrood “gangand before them with licht torches as
they came up the Black Frier Wynd.”‘ So that it would appear she walked quietly
home, with her few attendants, through these closes and down the Canongate, at that late
hour, without exciting among the citizens any notice of the presence of royalty.
Here the Queen frequently visited Darnley.
1 Keith, vol. ii. p. 434. ’
a Rubertson’s Hiat., vol. ii. p. 354.
a Laing, vol. ii. p. 296.
4 Pitcairn’s Criminal Triala, vol. i. part ii, p. 493. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. buildings often before used as a royal residence, and in one of the apartments of ...

Book 10  p. 85
(Score 0.28)

THE HIGH STREET. 237
well-known landscape painter,’ and among his subjects may be mentioned the celebrated
historical painter, Alexander Runciman, Sir Brimstone; Robert Ferguson, the poet, dubbed
Sir Precentor, most probably from his fine musical voice; Gavin Wilson, the poetical
shoemaker, who published a collection of masonic songs in 1788, whose club title was Sir
Maccaroni; Walter Williamson of Cardrona, Esq., a thorough specimen of the rough 6on
civant laird of the last age; Walter Ross, the antiquary; Sir Henry Raeburn, who had
already been dubbed a knight under the title of Sir Tohy, ere George IT. gave him that of
Sir Henry; with a host of other knights of great and little renown, of whom we shall only
specify Sir Lluyd, as the notorious William Brodie was styled. Some ingenious member
has drawn on the margin of the minutes of his election, April 27th, 1773, a representation
of his last public appearance, on the new drop of his own invention, some fifteen years
later. The old books of the Club abound with such pencilled illustrations and commentaries,
in which the free touch of Runciman may occasionally be traced, among ruder
sketches of less practised hands.
The
novice, on making his appearance in Cape Hall, was led up to the Sovereign by two knightly
sponsors, and having made his obeisance, was required to grasp the large poker with his left
hand, and, laying his right hand on his breast, the oath dejdeli was administered to him
by the Sovereign-the knights present all standing uncovered-in the following words :-
I swear devoutly by this light,
To be a true and faithful Knight,
With all my might,
Both day and night,
The following was the established form of inauguration of a Knight of the Cape.
So help me Poker !
Having then reverentially kissed the larger poker, and continuing to grasp it, the Sovereign
raised the smaller poker with both his royal fists, and, aiming three successive blows at the
novice’s head, he pronounced, with each, one of the initial letters of the motto of the Club,
C. F. D., explaining their import to be Concordia Fratrum Decus. The knight elect
was then called upon to recount some adventure or scrape which had befallen him, from
some leading incident in which the Sovereign selected the title conferred on him, and which
he ever after bore in Cape Hall. This description of the mode of inauguration into that
knightly order will explain the allusions in Ferguson’s poem :-
The Club, whose honours were
But chief, 0 Cape ! we crave thy aid,
To get our cares and poortith laid.
Sincerity, and genius true,
Of Knights have ever been the due.
Mirth, music, porter deepest dyed,
Are never here to worth denied ;
And health, 0’ happiness the queen,
Blinks bonny, wi’ her smile serene.
thus carefully hedged in by solemn ceremonial, established
its importance by deeds consistent with its lofty professions, among which may be specified
the gift by his Majesty of the Cape to his Majesty of Great Britain in 1778, of a contribution
from the Knights of one hundred guineas, (( to assist his Majesty in raising troops.”
1 Jacob Yore was a pupil of Alexander Runciman. He went to Rome about 1773, where he acquired a hiih reputation
as a landscape painter. He applied his art ta the arrangement of the gardens of the Prince Borghese’s villa, near
the Pork Pinciana, with such taste, as excited the highest admiration of the Italiios.-puSeZi. ... HIGH STREET. 237 well-known landscape painter,’ and among his subjects may be mentioned the ...

Book 10  p. 258
(Score 0.28)

52 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
marched under a white banner, on which was painted a female kneeling before a crucifix,
her hair dishevelled, and embroidered underneath the motto ‘‘ Afflicts Ecclesis ne
obliviscaris.”
Preparatory to determining their differences by force of arms, the Earl of Huntly made
offer to the English leader to decide the issue by single combat ; but this he rejected, and
after skirmishing for several daya with various success in the neighbourhood of Prestonpans,
where the English army was encamped,-a scene long afterwards made memorable
by the brief triumph of Mary’s hapless descendant, Charles Stuart-the two armies at
length came to a decisive engagement on Saturday the 10th of September 1547, long
after known by the name of ‘‘ Black Saturday.”
The field of Pinkie, the scene of this fatal contest, lies about six miles distant from
Edinburgh, and so near to the sea, that the English ships did great injury to the Scottish
army, as they marched towards the field of battle. The stately mansion of Pinkie House,
formerly the residence of the Abbots of Dunfermline, still remains in perfect preservation,
in the immediate vicinity of the scene where the fatal battle of Pinkie was fought. The
Scots were at first victorious, and succeeded in driving back the enemy, and carrying off
the royal standard of England ; but being almost destitute of cavalry, they were unable to
follow up their advantage, and being at length thrown into disorder by the enemy’s menat-
arms, consisting principally of a body of mounted Spanish carabineers in complete mail,
they were driven from the field, after a dreadful slaughter, with the loss of many of their
nobles and leaders, both slain and taken prisoners.
Immediately after the battle, the English advanced and took the town of Leith, where
they tarried a few days, during which the Earl of Huntly, and many other Scottish
prisoners of every degree, were confined in St Mary’s Church there, while treating for
their ran~om.~T hey also made an unsuccessful attempt on Edinburgh, whose provost
had fallen on the field, and where it is recorded that this fatal battle had alone made
three hundred and sixty widows ; ’ but finding the Scottish nation as resolute as ever in
rejecting all terms of accommodation, they again pillaged and burned the town of Leith,
spoiled the Abbey of Holyrood, from which they tore off the leaden roof, and re-embarked
on board t,heir fleet. They wreaked their vengeance on some defenceless fishing towns
and villages along the coast of the Firth, and then returned to England, where Archbishop
Cranmer prepared a general thanksgiving to be used throughout all the churches
in the kingdom, for the great victory God had vouchsafed them over their enemies 1 So
differently are the same actions estimated, according as our interests are affected ; for the
Duke of Somerset had so exasperated the Scottish nation by his cruelty, and disgusted
even the barons who had inclined to the English party by his impolitic conduct, that they
were more unanimous than ever against the proposed alliance. ‘‘ The cruelty,” says
Qtler, “of the slaughter at Pinkie, and the subsequent severities at Leith, excited
universal indignation ; and the idea that a free country was to be compelled into a pacific
matrimonial alliance, amid the groans of its dying citizens, and the flames of its seaports,
was revolting and absurd.”
The Queen Dowager availed herself of the popular feeling thus so strongly excited with
1 Tytler, vol. vi. p. 31. ‘ Herries’ Memoirs, p. 21.
2 Diumd of Occurrenta, p. 44,
6 Tytler, vol. vi, p. 42.
a Bishop Lesiie’s History, p. 198. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. marched under a white banner, on which was painted a female kneeling before a ...

Book 10  p. 57
(Score 0.28)

YAMES l? TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARK 59
This year also is the period of John Knox's return to Scotland. On his escape from
France-whither he had been carried a prisoner, after the taking of the Castle of St
Andrews-he had remained in England till the death of Edward VI., whence he went for
a time to Geneva. Immediately on his return to Scotland, he began preaching against
the mass, as an idolatrous worship, with such effect that he was summoned before the
ecclesiastical judicatory, held in the Blackfriars' Church in Edinburgh, on the 15th of
May 1556. The case, however, was not pursued at the time, probably from apprehension
of a popular tumult; but the citation had the usual effect of increasing his popularity;
" and it is certain," says Bishop Keith, '' that Mr -Knox preached to a greater auditory
the very day he should have made his appearance, than ever he did before."' At this
time it was that the letter was written by him to the Queen Regent, entreating for
reformation in the Church, which, on its being delivered to her by the Earl of Glencairn,
she composedly handed it to the Archbishop of Glasgow, after glancing at it, saying-
" Please y-o.u , my Lord, to look at a pasquill I "-a striking contrast to the influence he
afterwards exercised over her royal daughter.' No sooner had John Knox accepted an
invitation, which he received that same year, from an English congregation at Geneva,
than the clergy cited him anew before them, and in default of his appearance, he was
condemned as an heretic, and burned in effigy at the Cross of Edinburgh.
Towards the close of the year 1555, the City of Edinburgh gave a sumptuous
entertainment to the Danish Ambassador, at the expense of twenty-five pounds, seventeen
shillings, and one penny Scots I doubtless a magnificent civic feast in those days.' About
this time, the Queen Regent, acting under the advice of her French councillors, excited
the general indignation of the Scottish nobility and people in general, by a scheme for
raising a standing army, to supersede the usual national force, composed of the nobles
and their retainers, and which was to be supported by a tax imposed on every man's
estate and substance. Numerous private assemblies of the barons and gentlemen took
place to organise a determined opposition to the scheme ; and at length three hundred of
them assembled in the Abbey Church of Holyrood, and despatched the Lairds of Calder
and Wemyss to the Queen Regent and her council, with so resolute a remonstrance, that
the Queen was fain to abandon the project, and thought them little worthy of thanks that
were the inventors of what proved a fertile source of unpopularity to her government'
The contentions arising from differences in religion now daily increased, and the populace
of the capital were among the foremost to manifest their zeal against the ancient faith.
In the year 1556, they destroyed the statues of the Virgin Mary, Trinity, and St Francis,
in St Giles's Church, which led to a very indignant remonstrance from the Queen Regent,
addressed to the magistrates ; but they do not seem to have been justly chargeable with
sympathy in such reforming movements, as we find the council of that same year, in
addition to other marks of honour conferred on the Provost, ordering that for his greater
state, the servants of all the inhabitants shall attend him, with lighted torches, from the
vespers or evening prayers, to his house.6
On the breaking out of war between England and France, in 1557, the Queen Regent,
.
1 Bishop Keith's History, vol. i. p. 150.
8 Council Registers, Maitland, p. 14.
Calderwood's Historp, Wodrow Soc., voL i. p. 316.
Bishop Leslie'n Hist., p. 255.
Maitland, p. 14. ... l? TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARK 59 This year also is the period of John Knox's return to Scotland. On ...

Book 10  p. 64
(Score 0.28)

YAMES VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES II. 93
Memyss, his next door neighbonr, who sent a party of servants to his aid, and had the
unfortunate prelate brought to the shelter of the Earl’s own mansion.’
In the Greyfriars’ Church the service-book met with a similar reception, while most
of the other cler,gy prudently delayed its use, till they should see how it was relished by
the people. This memorable day was afterwards distinguished by the name of Stoney
Sunday.’ ‘‘ The immortal Jenet Geddis,” as she is styled in a pamphlet of the period, survived
long after her heroic onslaught on the Dean of Edinburgh. She kept a cabbage-stall at
the Tron Kirk, as late as 1661, and, notwithstanding the scepticism of some zealous
investigators, the Society of Antiquaries for Scotland still show, in their museum, her
formidable weapon-the cutty stool,-with which this heroine struck the initial stroke in
the great civil war.’
The multitudes of,all ranks, who speedily assembled in Edinburgh, determined to unite
for mutual protection, They formed a league for the defence of religion, each section being
classified according to their ranks, and thus arose the famous committees called the Fow
TABLES. On the royal edict for the maintenance of the service-book being proclaimed at
the Market Cross, on the 22d February 1638, a solemn protest was read aloud by some of
the chief noblemen of that party deputed for that purpose, and five days afterwards, between
two and three hundred clergymen and others assembled at the Tailors’ Hall (a fine
old building still existing in the Cowgate), and took into consideration the COVENANTth at
had been drawn up.
This important document was presented to a vast multitude, who assembled on the
following day in the Greyfriars’ Chtrch and Churchyard. It was solemnly read aloud, and
after being signed by the nobles and others in the church, it was laid on a &t tombstone
in the churchyard, and eagerly signed by all ranks of the people. The parchment on which
it was engrossed was four feet long, and when there was no longer room on either side to
write their namee, the people subscribed their initials round the margin.
The same National Covenant, when renewed at a later date, was placed for signature
in an old mansion, long afterwards used as a tavern, and which still remains in good
preservation, at the foot of the Covenant Close, as it has ever since been called.
In the year 1641 Charles again visited Edinburgh, for the purpose of ‘‘ quieting distrac-
- tion for the people’s satisfaction.” The visit, however, led to little good ; he offended his
friends without conciliating his enemies, and after another civic entertainment from the
magistrates of the city, he bade a h a 1 adieu to his Scottish capital. He is said to have been
fond of the game of golf, and the following anecdote is told of him in connection with it:-
While he was engaged in a party at this game, on the Links of Leith, a letter was delivered
into his hands, which gave him the first account of the insurrection and rebellion
in Ireland. On reading which, he suddenly called for his coach, and, leaning on one of his
attendants, and in great agitation, drove to the Palace of Holyrood House, from whence
next day he set out for London.’
The Covenanters followed up their initiatory movement in the most resolute and effective
1 (!hambera%~ Rebellions in Scotland, vol. i p. 66,
1 Edinburgh’a Joy, &c., 1661. ’ W. Tytler of Woodhouselee, Esq., Archceologia Scotica, voi. i p. 603.
* Arnot, p. 109.
Chambers’s Winor htiq., p. 180.
Charles’s immediate departure for London, ae he stayed till the diaaolution of the Scottish Parliament.
The anecdote is 80 far incorrect aa to. ... VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES II. 93 Memyss, his next door neighbonr, who sent a party of servants to his ...

Book 10  p. 101
(Score 0.28)

BATTLE OF FLODDEN TO DEATH OF JAMES V. 41
address and vigour, and with only two attendants, made his escape from t.he Douglas faction,
at Falkland, to Stirling Castle. Shortly after this, he repaired to Edinburgh, whither he
summoned his barons to advise with him, and, with a degree of decision far beyond his
years, proceeded to assert his own independence and authority. One of the acts of this
Parliament against them, “ quha cummis and burnis folkes in their howis,”’ exhibits in no
very pleasing light the rude violence prevailing at the period.
The year 1530 is assigned as the date of Lindsay’s famous satire, The Complaint of
the Papingo,’ which may be regarded as the first note of the reforming movement by him,
of whom Pinkerton has said, ‘‘ In fact, Sir David was more the reformer of Scotland than
John Knox ; for he had prepared the pound, and John only sowed the seed” The farewell
of the papingo to the capital is couched in terms the more flattering, as coming
from so keen 8 sathi&,-
“ Adew Edinburgh, thou heich triumphand toun,
Within quhose boundia, richt blgthful have I bene,
Of trew merchandin, the rute of thie regioun,
Most reddy to resaave Court, King, and Queue;
Thy policie, and justice, may be sene,
Were devotioun, wysedom, and honestie,
And credence, tint, they micht be found in thee.”
Various notices occurring ahout this period, exhibit the first symptoms of the reforming
doctrines showing themselves in the capital, e.g., in the Diurnal of Occurrents for 1532,
“ In this zeir was ane greit objuratioun of the favouraris of Mertene Lutar, in the Abbay
of Halymdhous.” About the same period, it records the destruction of nearly the whole
town by an accidental fire. This same year, the nobles assembled at Edinburgh, at the
King’s summons, with their followers, to the number of twelve thousand, for the famous
hunting match, in which Johnnie Armstrong, the Border reiver, renowned in song and
story, was hanged, ‘( to daunton the theives of Tividaill and Annandaill.”
Notice has already been taken of Dunbar’s allusions to the Court of Session, in the
former reign, but now, in 1537, the King instituted the College of Justice, and established
the Court on a pernianent footing, with the confirmation of Pope Clement VII.
This event is one of the most important in the history of Edinburgh, on which, from that
time, both its prosperity and its metropolitan claims have more depended than on any occurrence
in its history ; and which, from the aecurity and the ready means of redress it afforded
to the inhabitants against the turbulent nobles of the period, made the town a place of
greater resort than it had ever before been.
The King now, with that self-reliance and energy that marked his entire character, after
negotiating for the hand of various noble ladies in marriage, set sail from Leith, accompanied
by a large fleet and a numerous retinue; and, arriving at the French Court, he wooed
and won for himself the Princess Magdalene, eldest daughter of Francis I. On the 29th
of May the royal pair landed at Leith, amid every display of welcome; and after tarrying
for a few days at the Palace of Holyrood, till the preparations of the citizens were
completed, the Queen made. her entry in atatc into the capital, with processions of great
Scots Actg 1Zmq TO]. i. p. 201. ’ Parrot. ‘ Hawthornden, p. 99. Scots Ads, 12m0, vol i. p. 217,
Diurnal of Occurrents, p, 15. ’ Pitscottie, voL ii. p. 342. ... OF FLODDEN TO DEATH OF JAMES V. 41 address and vigour, and with only two attendants, made his escape from ...

Book 10  p. 45
(Score 0.28)

172 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
representing the Adoration of the Wise Men, was said to be the work of Alexander
Runciman.
We have endeavoured thus far to conduct the reader through this portion of the
ancient capital, pointing out the various associations calculated to excite sympathy or
interest in connection with its time-honoured scenes. But all other objects of attraction
to the local historian, within this district, must yield before those of the Old Bank Close,
the site of which was very nearly that of the present paving of Melbourne Place. The
antique mansion, that formed the chief building in this close, excited very great and
general attention from the time that it was exposed to view in opening up the approach
to George 1V.k Bridge, until its demolition in 1834, to make way for the central
buildings of Melbourne Place, that now occupy its site. It stood immediatel) to the east
of William Little’s Land, already described, in Brodie’s Close, from which it was only
partially separated by a very narrow gutter that ran between the two houses, leaving them
united by a mutual wall at the north end.
This ancient building was curiously connected with a succession of eminent and
influential men, and with important historical events
of various eras, from the date of its erection until a
comparatively recent period. ‘‘ Gourlay’s House, ”
for so it continued to be called nearly to the last,
was erected in 1569, as appeared from the date on it,
by Robert Gourlay, burgess, on the site, and, partly
at least, with the materials of an old religious house.
Little further is known of its builder than the fact
that he had been a wealthy and influential citizen,
who enjoyed the favour of royalty, and made the
most of it too, notwithstanding the pious averment sculptured over his door, 0 LORD
IN THE IS AL MY TRAIST.’ This appears no less from numerous grants of
privileges and protections of rights, among the writs and evidents of the property,
attested by King James’s own signature, than by the very obvius jealousy with which
his favour at Court was regarded by his fellow-citizens.
One of these royal mandates, granted by the Kiig at Dumfries, 21st June 1588, sets
forth, ‘‘ Lyke 8s ye said Robert Gourlay and Helen Cruik, his spouse,’haa raisit ane new
biggin and wark upon ye waste and ground of their lands and houses foresaid, wherein
they are quarelled and troubled for enlarging and outputing of ye east gavill and dyke of
their said new wark, on with ye bounds of ye auld bigging foundit and edified thereupon,
of design, and presumed to have diminished and narrowit ye passage of ye foresaid transe
callit Mauchains Close, &c.,’ We, therefor, . . . . . give and grant special liberty
On the demolition of the building, the words I‘ 0 Lord,” which extended beyond the lintel of the door, were found
to be carved on oak, and so ingeniously let into the wall that this had escaped observation. One could almost fancy that
the subservient courtier had found his abbreviated motto liable to a more personal construction than was quite agreeable. ’ In the earlier part of the same writ, the property is styled ‘I ye landa of umq’ Alexander Mauthane, and now of ye
said Robert Gourlay.” We learn from Maitland, that in the year 1511, “ the Town Council twoarda inlarging the said
Church of St Giles, bought of AEezander MaucAanes, four landa or tenementa, in the Booth-raw,” or Luckenbo0tha.-
Maitland‘a Hist., p. 180. This can acarcely be doubted to be the same individual.
VIoaEnE-carved Stone from Old Bank Close, in the posse&on of C. K. Sharpe, Esq. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. representing the Adoration of the Wise Men, was said to be the work of ...

Book 10  p. 187
(Score 0.28)

THE CANONGATE AND ABBEY SANCTUARY. 291
were removed in 1779. It is not at all inconsistent with the character of the fierce
old cavalier that he should have erected.a private chapel for his own use. Death fortunately
stepped in, eays his fellow-soldier, Captain Crichton, in allusion to the dilemma
in which the General was placed on the accession of James VII., and ‘‘ rescued him from
the difEculties he was likely to be under, between the notions he had of duty to his
prince on one side, and true zeal f o r his religion on the other.” The main idea that seems
to have guided him through life was a chivalrous loyalty. He allowed his beard to grow
as a manifestation of his grief on the beheading of King Charles, and retained it unaltered
till his death, though it latterly acquired a venerable amplitude that attracted a crowd
whenever he appeared in public. The early history of chivalry furnishes many examples
in proof of the perfect compatibility of such devoted loyalty with the cruelties which have
rendered his name infamous to posterity.
The Shoemakers’ Lands, which stand to the east of Jack’s Land, are equally lofty and
more picturesque buildings, One of them especially, immediately opposite to Moray
House, is a very singular and striking object in the stately range of substantial stone tenements
that extend from New Street to the Canongate Tolbooth. A highly-adorned tablet
surmounts the main entrance, enriched with angels’ heads, and a border of Elizabethan
ornament enclosing the Shoemakers’ Arms, with the date 1677. An open book is inscribed
with the first verse of the Scottish metre version of the 133d Psalm,-a motto that appears
to have been in special repute, toward8 the close of the seventeenth century, among
the suburban corporations, being also inscribed over the Tailors’ Hall of Easter Portsburgh
and the Shoemakers’ Land in the West Port, The turnpike stair-the entrance
to which is graced by this motto, and the further inscription, in smaller letters, IT IS AN
crowned with an ogee roof of singular character, flanked on either side by picturesque
gables to the street. The first of the two tenements to the west of this, at the head of
Shoemakers’ Close, has an open pannel on its front, from which the inscription appears to
have been removed; but the other, which bears the date 1725, is still adorned with the
same arms, and the following moral aphorism :-
HONOUR FOR MAN TO CEASE FROM STRIFE-rises above the roof Of the building, and is
BLESSED IS HE THAT WISELY DO
TH THE POOR MAN’S CASE CONSIDER.
The hall of the once wealthy Corporation of Cordiners or Shoemakers of Canongate,
to whom this property belonged, stood on the west side of Little Jack’s Close, adorned
with the insignia of the Souters’ Craft, and furnished for the convivial meetings of the
fraternity with huge oaken tables and chairs ; and with a substantial carved oaken throne,
adorned with the arms-a paring knife surmounted by a crown-and the date
1682, for the inauguration of King Crispin on the 25th of October, or St Crispin’s Day.
It was long the annual custom of the craft to elect a king, who was borne through the
town, attended by. his subjects, dressed in all sorts of fantastic and showy attire;
after which he held his court at the Corporation Hall, and celebrated his coronation
with royal festivities. Unhappily for the Cordiners of Canongate, the sumptuary laws
1 Memoirs of Captain Crichton, Swift’s works, London, 1803, vol. xiv. p. 318. ... CANONGATE AND ABBEY SANCTUARY. 291 were removed in 1779. It is not at all inconsistent with the character of ...

Book 10  p. 316
(Score 0.28)

ECCLESIASTICAL ANTIQUITIES. 405
evidence remains to show that the choir and transepts were in existence filly a quarter of
a century later, and that had the necessary exertions been then made for its repair, we
might still have possessed the ancient building in its ori,oinal and magnificent proportions,
instead of the ruined nave, which alone remains to show what once had been. In (‘ the
heads of the accusation and chief offences laid to Adam, Bishop of Orknay, his charge,”
by the General Assembly of 1569, the fifth is, that “ all the said kirks, for the most part,
wherein Christ’s evangell may be preached, are decayed, and made, some sheepfolds, and
some so ruinous, that none darre enter into them for fear of falling; specially Halrudhouse,
although the bishop of Sanct Andrews, in time of papistry, sequestrate the whole
rents of the said abbacy, because only the glassen windows were not holden up and
repaired.” To this the Bishop replied, “ That the Abbay Church of Hdyrudhouse hath
been, these 20 years bygane, ruinous through decay of two principal1 pillars, so that none
were assured under it ; and two thousand pounds bestowed upon it would not be sufficient
to ease men to the hearing of the word, and ministration of the sacraments. But with
their consent, and help of ane established authority, he was purposed to provide the
means, that the superfluous ruinous parts, to wit, the Queir and Croce Kuk, might be
disponed be faithful1 men, to repair the remanent sufficiently.” The Bishop’s economical
plan was no doubt put in force, and the whole of the choir and transept soon after
demolished and sold, to provide funds for converting the nave into the Parish Kirk of
the Canongate. The two western pillars, designed to support a great central tower,
now form the sides of the east window constructed within the arch, and an examination
of the masonry with which the lower parts of this and the side arches are closed, shows
that it is entirely built with fragments of clustered shafts and other remains of the
ruins. It was at this time, we presume, that the new royal vault was constructed in
the south aisle of the nave, and the remains of the Scottish kings removed from their
ancient resting-place near the high altar of the Abbey Church. It is built against the
ancient Norman doorway of the cloisters, which still remains externally, with its beautiful
shafts and zigzag mouldings, an undoubted relic of the original fabric of St David.
The cloisters appear to have enclosed a large court, formed in the angle of the nave
and south transept. The remains of the north side are clearly traceable still, and the
site of the west side is now occupied by the Palace buildings. Here was the ambulatory
for the old monks, when the magnificent foundation of St David retained its pristine
splendour, and it remained probably till the burning of the Abbey after the death of
James V. We learn on the occasion of the marriage of James IT. with the Princess
Margaret of England, that “after all reverences doon at the Church, in ordere as
before, the Kyng transported himself to the Pallais, through the clostre, holdynge
always the Queen by the body, and hys hed bare, till he had brought hyr within her
chammer.”
The west front, as it now remains, is evidently the work of very different periods. It
has been curtailed of the south tower to admit of the completion of the quadrangle according
to the design of Sir William Bruce, and the singular and unique windows over the
great doorway are evidently additions of the time of Charles L, whose initials appear
1 Booke of the Umveraall Kirk of Scotland, p. 163. Ibid, p. 167. ... ANTIQUITIES. 405 evidence remains to show that the choir and transepts were in existence filly a ...

Book 10  p. 444
(Score 0.28)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 385
rank of Captain in the 44th, or Lee’s Regiment of Foot. With this corps he
was present at the affair of Prestonpans in 1745 ; and was captured by the
forces of the Chevalier. Along with the other prisoners of war, he was carried
to Edinburgh, where the officers were liberated on parole not to depart from
the city nor correspond with the enemies of the Prince. After the suppression
of the Rebellion, Mr. Cochrane for some time held the office of Deputy-Governor
of the Isle of Man, under the Duke of Atholl. On the resignation of his brother
in 1761, he was appointed one of the Commissioners of Excise; and, three years
subsequently, was advanced to the Eoard of Customs.
Mr. Cochrane resided at Dalry, a small property to the west of Edinburgh,
where he died unmarried, on the 2d October 1788. The etching of him in the
Print is very characteristic. He always walked with his gold-headed staff in
his hand-his head inclining a little downwards ; and he wore black silk-velvet
straps, instead of garters, which added very much to his military appearance.
He was greatly respected by the other members of the Board, as well as by all
who knew him.
The centre figure, COMMISSIONER EDGAR, from whom a beggar is
soliciting alms, was another old bachelor, but of habits very different from the
former. His rumoured parsimony induced Ray to give the stern expression of
countenance with which he is portrayed in the etching. This charge was
probably greatly exaggerated, as the erection of a spire to the church of Lasswade,
entirely from his own funds, was certainly no indication of miserly feeling;
yet he was at no pains to discountenance the general opinion. Indeed, he
rather seemed to delight in keeping up the impression; and, as if more
thoroughly to manifest his unsociable disposition to all the world, he had a
carriage built with only one seat, in which he used to drive to and from the
city. This vehicle he was pleased to denominate his “ sulky.”
great Whig ancestors, being the grandson of Sir John Cochrane of Ochiltree, second son of the first
Earl, who, having fled to Holland froin the tyranny of Charles II., came over with Argyll in 1686,
and waa subsequently taken and brought to the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, ignominiously conducted by
the common hangman, but eventually parzoned by James VII. His grandmother was a daughter
of Sir William Strickland of Boynton, who had been one of Cromwell’s Lords of Parliament. It is
therefore little to be wondered at that he was himself a Whig, and zealously attached to the house
of Hanover. We have derived some traditions respecting his family in 1745 from the daughter of
one who was then his lady’s waiting-maid. On the Highlanders approaching the city, Mr. Cochrane
thought proper to remove to the country, and his lady (the celebrated and lovely Jean Stewart of
Tononce) was just preparing to follow him, when the Prince’s army unexpectedly took possession
of the capitaL Our venerable authority has ‘full many a time and oft’ heard her mother describe
how she and her lady looked over one of these ten windows, and saw the detachment of Cameron’s
Highlanders, who rushed in at the Nether Bow, marching up the High Street, while two ba,Tipers
played, in spirit-stirring tones, ‘We’ll awa’ to Shirra-muir, to haud the Whigs in order.’ She has
also heard her mother descant with much delight upon the ball given to the ladies of the city of
Edinburgh, by the Duke of Cumberland, after his return from Culloden. Mrs. Cochrane and her
maid walked down the Canongate to Holyrood House, where they were received by his Royal
Highness and some of his Hessian ofticers ; and it is reported that the Duke, after saluting the lady,
went up to her attendant, and, either because he liked her best, or because he could use the.most
freedom with her, favoured her with double the compliment.”
3 D ... SKETCHES. 385 rank of Captain in the 44th, or Lee’s Regiment of Foot. With this corps he was ...

Book 8  p. 537
(Score 0.27)

362 MEMORIAL S OF EDINB URG H.
old oaken chair remained till recently an heirloom, bequeathed by its patrician occupants
to the humble tenants of their degraded dwellings. A recent writer on the antiquities
of Leith, conceives it probable that this may have been the residence of the Regent
Lennox; but we have been baffled in our attempts to arrive at any certain evidence
on the subject by reference to the titles. “ Mary,” says Maitland, “ haviug begun
to build in the town of Leith, was followed therein by divers of the nobility, bishops,
and other persons of distinction of her party; several of whose houses are still remaining,
as m y be seen in sundry places, by their spacious rooms, lofty ceilings, large staircases,
and private oratories or chapels for the celebration of mass.” Beyond the probable
evidence afforded by such remains of decaying splendour and former wealth, nothing
more can now be ascertained. The occupation of Leith by nobles and dignitaries of
the Church was of a temporary nature, and under circumstances little calculated to
induce them to leave many durable memorials of their presence. A general glance, therefore,
at such noticeable features as still remain, will suffice to complete our survey of the
ancient seaport.
The earliest date that we have discovered on any of the old private buildings of the
burgh, occurs on the projecting turnpike of an antique tenement at the foot of Burgess
Close, which bears this inscription on the lintel, in Roman characters :-NISI DNS FRUSTBA,
1573. This ancient alley is the earliest thoroughfare in the burgh of which we have
any account. It was granted to the burgesses of Edinburgh, towards the close of the
fourteenth century, by Logan of Restalrig, the baronial over-lord of Leith, before it
acquired the dignity of a royal burgh, and the owner of nearly all the lands that extended
along the banks of the harbour of Leith. We are led to infer from the straitened proportions
of this narrow alley, that the whole exports and imports of the shipping of Leith were
conveyed on pack-horses or in wheel-barrows, as it would certainly prove impassable for
any larger wheeled convejance. Its inconvenience, however, appears to have been felt at
the time, and the Laird of Restalrig was speedily compelled to grant a more commodious
access to the shore. The inscription which now graces this venerable thoroughfare, though
of a date so much later than its first construction, preserves a memorial of its gifts to the
civic Council of Edinburgh, as we may reasonably ascribe to the veneration of some wealthy
merchant of the capital the inscribing over the doorway of his mansion at Leith the
very appropriate motto of the City Arms. To this, the oldest quarter of the town, indeed,
we must direct those who go “in search of the picturesque.” Watera’ Close, which
adjoins Burgess Close, is scarcely surpassed by any venerable alley of the capital, either in
its attractive or repulsive features. Stone and timber lands are mixed together in admired
disorder ; and one antique tenement in particular, at the corner of Water Lane, with a
broad projecting turnpike, contorted by corbels and string courses, and every variety of
convenient aberration from the perpendicular or horizontal, which the taste or whim of its
constructor could devise, is one of the most singular edifices that the artist could select as a
subject for his pencil.
The custom of affixing sententious aphorisms to the entrances of their dwellings appears
to have pertained fully as much to the citizens of Leith as of Edinburgh. BLISSIT . BE .
GOD . OF . HIS . GIFTIS . 1601., I. W., I. H., is boldly cut on a large square panel on
the front of an old house at the head of Sheriff Brae; and the same favourite motto ... MEMORIAL S OF EDINB URG H. old oaken chair remained till recently an heirloom, bequeathed by its patrician ...

Book 10  p. 398
(Score 0.27)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 187
In the unfortunate “ Walcheren Expedition,” undertaken in 1809, under
the late Earl of Chatham, the Marquis commanded the fourth division. The
object of this armament, which had been fitted out on a very extensive scale,
was the destruction of the fleet and arsenal at Anbwerp, but except in the bombardment
of Flushing, the expedition entirely failed of success.
With the Walcheren expedition closed the foreign military career of the
Marquis of Huntly. His subsequent life was distinguished bya patriotic and active
zeal in whatever tended to the honour or advantage of his native country. He was
long a member, and frequently President, of the Highland Society, an association
which has done so much to improve the agriculture and condition of the
peasantry of Scotland. As a mark of distinction, in 1813, the Marquis was
appointed General of the ancient body denominated the Royal Archers of
Scotland, or King’s Body Guard. Of the Celtic Society he was also an equally
honoured member ; and, in short, in all patriotic or national associations he was
found to yield enthusiastic co-operation.
On the death of his lordship’s father, in 1827, he succeeded to the dukedom
of Gordon in Scotland, and the earldom of Norwich in England ; and in the
still more extended sphere of influence thus opened to him, the spirit which
had animated the Marquis continued to be manifested in the Duke. The great
improvements which he effected on his extensive estates-the exquisite taste
displayed in laying out the grounds and ornamenting the lawns around the
princely Castle of Gordon-together with his successful .exertions in improving
the breed of Highland cattle, and promoting agriculture, are well-known instances
of the Duke’s untiring zeal and perseverance.
He married, in 1813, Elizabeth, daughter of the late Alexander Brodie,
Esq. of Am Hall, but had no issue. His Grace died at London in June 1836,’
and with him the dukedom of Gordon and earldom of Norwich became extinct.
The title of Marquis of Huntly, and some of the inferior dignities, devolved to
his Grace’s ‘‘ heir-male whatsoever,” the Earl of Aboyne. The estates passed
by virtue of an entail to his nephew, the Duke of Richmond.
As a tribute to the memory of the Duke of Gordon, we beg to append the following letter of
condolence to the Duchess from the Governors of the London Scottish Hospital, whose opportunities
of knowing his Grace’s exertions in the cause of charity give peculiar weight to their sentiments :
Unto her Grace Elizabeth Duchess of Gordon, Marchioness of Huntly, Countess of
Huntly; Enzie, and Norwich, Viscountess of Inverness, etc. etc etc. etc.
MADAM,
WE, the Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, and Governors of the Scottish Hospital of the foundation of
King Charles the Second, re-incorporated by King George the Third, in General Court assembled,
beg leave thus to olfer our heartfelt condolence upon the severe bereavement with which God in his
Providence has seen meet to make trial of your “faith and patience.”
Be assured, Madam, that it is not in the observance of a mere formality, but because of that
alfectionate regard which we must ever entertain for the memory of our late noble President, that
we intrude thus early upon that grief in which we do sincerely participate.
When, at the command of our present most gracious King and Patron, the Duke of Gordon
entered upon the Presidency of this Institution, we congratulated ourselves on the acquisition of a
nobleman whose ancient and honourable lineage, and whose generous, chivalrous character, concurred
with his previoua knowledge of the Society, and zeal for its interests, to recommend him to our ... SKETCHES. 187 In the unfortunate “ Walcheren Expedition,” undertaken in 1809, under the late ...

Book 8  p. 264
(Score 0.27)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 321
. Such is a brief account of the election; but when the scrutiny had been
entered into, the precaution of the Dean of Faculty was found to have been
highly judicious. On finding himself in a minority, Dr. Carlyle wisely withdrew
his claim before the report of the committee was presented. Professor Dalziel
was thereupon declared the “ successful candidate.”
PROFESSOARN DREWD ALZIELw as the son of respectable, although not
wealthy parents. His father was a wright, or carpenter, at the village of
Kirkliston, in Linlithgowshire. He was born in 1742, and educated at the
school of the village. Dr. Drysdale was at that time minister of Kirkliston ;
and, fortunately for the young scholar, took much interest in his progress, by
assisting and directing him in his studies.
In course of time young Dalziel entered the University of Edinburgh;
where, with a view to the ministry, he studied with much success, and acquired
a classical as well as theological education. In the Divinity Hall he is known
to have delivered the prescribed course of lectures to the satisfaction of Professor
Hamilton ; but it does not appear that he ever was licensed. About this time
he was fortunately appointed tutor to Lord Maitland (Earl of Lauderdale),
with whom he travelled to Paris, and pleased his pupil’s father so much, that,
shortly after his return from France, the Earl resolved to use his influence with
the Town Council of Edinburgh to procure his election to the Greek chair, then
vacant by the death of Professor Robert Hunter. Among other obstacles in
the way of his preferment, some of the Council favoured another candidate, Mr.
Duke Gordon, afterwards well known for many years as under-librarian of the
College.’ The interest of the Earl of Lauderdale, however, prevailed ; and
Dalziel was appointed to the Greek chair in 1773.
The enthusiastic manner in which the young Professor immediately set about
discharging the duties of the chair justified the choice which had been made.
1 Mr. Duke Gordon was the son of a linen manufacturer, and born in the Potterrow, Edinburgh.
His father was a native of Euntly-a Jacobite-and a thorough clansman. Hence, in testimony of
his respect to the head of the clan, his son was called Duke Gordon. Duke (who abhorred the name)
was educated at a school kept in the Cowgate by Mr. Andrew Waddell-a nonjurant-who had “been
out in the forty-five,” and was of course patronised by all his Jacobitical friends. Duke Gordon made
great progress under Mr. Waddell ; and, although compelled to follow hu father’s profession for several
years, had imbibed such a desire for languages, that he contrived to prosecute his studies ; and, on the
death of the old man, abandoned the manufacture of linen altogether, and devoted himself entirely to
literature. He had views to the ministry ; but some peculiar notions which he entertained on theology
shut the chorch doors upon him. In 1763 he was appointed assistant-librarian of the College Library
-a situation for which he was peculiarly well qualified by his extensive learning and general literary
acquirementa. The emoluments of the office being limited, he taught elasaes at his own house, by
which he added considerably to his income. He never was married ; and, such was his frugality,
he died in 1802 worth a great deal of money. To three of his particular friends-Professor Dalziel,
the Rev. Andrew Johnston, minister of Salton, and Mr. William White, writer in Edinburgh-he
conveyed, by his will, all his effecta, burdened with a life annuity to his only sister, the wife of a
respectable shoemaker, together with several other private legacies. His public bequests were-
E500 to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh ; the reversion of a tenement of houses, of nearly the
aanie value, to the poor of the parish of St. Cuthbert’s ; and such of his books to the Library of the
Univenity of Ediibnrgh as the Librarian should think proper to be added to that collection.
2 T ... SKETCHES. 321 . Such is a brief account of the election; but when the scrutiny had been entered ...

Book 8  p. 451
(Score 0.27)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 273
The same paragraph thus briefly relates the story of the standard, which had
caused so much speculation :-
“ On the celebrated 21st of March, when the French Invincibles found their retreat entirely
cut off by the Highlanders, two French officers advanced to Major Stirling and delivered their
standard into his hands, who immediately committed it to the charge of Sergeant Sinclair. Sinclair
being afterwards wounded, it was picked up in the field by a private of the Minorca corps, who
carried it to his own regiment. The standard was marked with the names of the different victories
of the Hero of Italy, but considerably worn. The name of the battle of Lodi was scarcely
visible.”
The following short account of the third monthly meeting of the Highland
Society of London, on the 23d of April 1802, is from a newspaper of that
period, and may not be deemed unentertaining :-
“ The meeting was held at the Shakspeare Tavern, Covent Garden, Lord Macdonald, president
for the year, in the chair. The company was very numerous, among whom appeared Lieut.-
Colonel Dickson, and thirteen officers of the 42d Regiment, in their uniforms, wearing the gold
medals presented to them by the Grand Signior. An elegant dinner was served at half-past six
o’clock, during which several national airs on the pipe were performed by the pipers of the
Society ; and a few pibrochs, with wonderful skill and execution, by Biichsnan, Pipe-Major of
the 42d Regiment. After dinner, severalloyal and appropriate toasts were given in the Gaelic
language, and many plaintive and martial songs were sung ; and the greatest harmony and
conviviality prevailed during the evening.‘ On the complimentary toast to the 42d Regiment,
and the two other Highland corps on the Egyptian service, having bcen given, the following
Stanza, the exemptore composition of a member present, was introduced by Digoum in the
characteristic air of ‘ The Garb of Old Gaul :’-
‘ The Pillar of Pompey, and famed Pyramids,
Have witnessed our valour and triumphant deeds ;
Th‘ Invincible standard from Frenchmen we bore,
In the land of the Reys, the laurels we wore ;
For such the fire of Highlanders, when brought into the field,
That Bonaparte’s Invincibles must perish, or must yield ;
We’ll bravely fight, like heroes bold, for honour and applause,
And we defy the Consul and the world to alter oiir laws.’ ”
The “Royal Highlanders ” returned to Scotland h 1802, and experienced
the most gratifying reception in all the towns as they marched from England
towards the capital of their own country, where they were welcomed with excess
of kindness and applause. During their stay in Edinburgh at this period the
regiment was presented with a new set of colours, on which were the figure of
a sphinx, and the word Egypt, as emblematic memorials of their gallant services
in the campaign of 1801. The interesting ceremony took place on the
Castle Hill, where, the regiment having been formed, the Rev. Principal Baird
delivered an appropriate prayer ; after which the Commander-in-Chief, General
Vyse, presented the colours to Colonel Dickson, and addressed his “ brother
soldiers of the 42d Regiment ” in a very energetic harangue. A vast concourse
of spectators were present on the occasion, amongst whom were the Duke of
Buccleuch, General Don, Colonels Cameron, Scott, Eaillie, Graham, and
several other military officers.
Gow’s band of ins€rumental music, Murphy the Irish piper, together with the vocal strains
of Dignum, and other public singers, added much to the general festivity.
VOL. 11. 2 N ... SKETCHES. 273 The same paragraph thus briefly relates the story of the standard, which had caused so ...

Book 9  p. 363
(Score 0.27)

THE CASTLE. 127
of Scotland is kept. The apartment is a massive bombproof vault, and contains, along
with these national treasures, the old, iron-bound oak chest in which they were found in
the year 1817. The remarkably elegant crown is referred, with every probability, to the
era of Bruce, although it was not adorned with the graceful concentric arches of gold till
the r e i p of James V. It was further completed by the substitution of the present cap of
crimson velvet by James VIL for the former purple one, which had suffered during its
concealment in the civil wars. Next in interest to the crown is the beautiful sword of
state, presented by Pope Julius 11. to James IV. The scabbard is richly wrought with
filigree work of silver, representing oak boughs adorned with leaves and acorns,-an oak
tree being the heraldic device of that warlike Pontiff. In addition to the finely proportioned
sceptre, surmounted with statues of the Virgin, St Andrew, and St James, which
was made for James V., these interesting national relics are accompanied by the royal jewels,
bequeathed by Cardinal York, the last of the Stuarts, to George IV., including the George
and collar of the Order of the Garter, presented by Queen Elizabeth to James VI.-the badge
of .the Thistle of the same Monarch, containing a portrait of Anne of Denmark,-and the
coronation ring of Charles I.
The north side of this quadrangle now consists of a plain and uninteresting ra.nge of
barracks, erected about the middle of last century, previous to which time the site was
occupied by a church of large dimensions and great antiquity. It is described by Maitland
as “ a very long and large ancient church, which,” says he, “ from its spacious dimensions,
I imagine that it was not only built for the use of the small garrison, but for the service of
the neighbouring inhabitants, before St Giles’s Church was erected for their accommodation.”
Unfortunately, that laborious and painstaking historian, having little taste for
ecclesiastical remains, has furnished no account of the style of architecture by which to
judge of its probable date, though his idea of its having existed before the earliest church
of St Giles, shows his conviction of its very great antiquity, and would carry its foundation
back to a much earlier period than can be assigned to it. This most probabIy was a church
that appears to have been built shortly after the death of the pious Queen of Malcolm Canmore,
and dedicated to her.
‘‘ the Church of the Castle of Edinburgh,” a and is again confirmed to the Abbey of the
Holy Rood in that of Alexander III., as well as in successive Papal bulls.’ Robert II.
granted to St Margaret’s Chapel, within the Castle of Edinburgh, an yearly rent of eight
pounds sterling, out of the customs of Edinburgh; and this donation is confirmed by
Robert IIL’
In the bird’seye
view in Cordon’s map, the south elevation is shown ; it also forms a prominent object
in Sandby’s view of the Castle from the east, already referred to, and would seem to have
been a comparatively plain edifice, with crow-step gables and small windows, and was, in
d1 probability, an erection in the Norman style that prevailed at the period. From the
latter view, it would also appear to have been roofed with stone flags, and ornamented along
the ridge with carved pinnacles, auch as may still be seen on St MaFy’s Church at Leith.
This church seems to have been applied to secular purposes soon%fter the Reformation
It is mentioned by David I. in his charter of Holyrood,
Some idea of the form of the church may be gathered from old views.
1 Maitland, p. 145.
a Liber Cartarurn, pp. 64, 169, 186.
Liber Cartarurn, pp. 3-7.
* Caledonia, vol. ii. p. 693. ... CASTLE. 127 of Scotland is kept. The apartment is a massive bombproof vault, and contains, along with these ...

Book 10  p. 138
(Score 0.27)

YAMES V. TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARY. 71
each of them frankly disclosing opinions, involviig the causes ‘of the collision that
speedily followed.
The Queen soon after made a progress to the north, and on her return to Edinburgh,
preparations were made on a most magnificent scale for welcoming her. On the 3d of
September, she dined in the Castle, and thereafter made her public entry. Fifty black
slaves, magniiicently apparelled, received her at the west gate of the city; twelve of the
chief citizens, dressed in black velvet gowns, with coats and doublets of crimson satin,
bore a canopy, under which ahe rode in state, and immediately on her entry, a lovely boy
descended from a globe, and addressing her in congratulatory verses, at which she was
seen to smile, presented her with the keys of t,he city, and a Bible and Psalter. The most
costly arrangements were made for her reception ; all the citizens were required to appear
in gowns of fine French satin and coats of velvet, and the young men to devise for
themselves some befitting habiliments of taffeta, or other silk, to convey the Court in
triumph. A public banquet was given to the Queen and the noble strangers by whom
she was accompanied ; and most ingenious masks and pageants provided for her entertainment,
peculiarly chagacteristic of the times. A mystery was performed, in which Korah,
Dathan, and Abiram were destroyed, while offering strange fire upon the altar, as a
warning of the vengeance of God upon idolaters. A still more significant interlude had
been provided for her Majesty’s benefit, in which a priest was to have been burnt at the
altar while elevating the host; but the Earl of Huntly persuaded them, with aome
difficulty, to content themselves with the first allegory.
All the public way through which the procession had to pass, was adorned with splendid
hangings and devices, and the Nether Bow Port, where the Queen bade adieu to her entertainers,
was decorated for the occasion in the most costly fashion.‘
The ancient Tolbooth, or “ Pretorium,” as it is styled in the early Acts of the Scottish
Parliaments, had fallen, at this time, into a very decayed and ruinous condition. The
Queen addressed a letter to the Town Council, bearing date the 6th of February 1561,
charging the Provost, Bailies, and Council to take it down with all possible diligence, and
provide, meanwhile, sufficient accommodation elsewhere for the Lords of the Session and
others ministering justice.
The royal letter expresses a most affectionate dread for “ the skayth and great slaughter”
that may happen to the lieges by the downfall of the building, if not speedily prevented ;
but no apology seems to have been thought necessary for the very arbitrary demand
that the city of Edinburgh should erect, at its own charge, parliament and court-houses
for the whole kingdom. The proceedings of the Town Council, for many months after
this, are replete with allusions to the many difficulties they had to encounter in raising
money and providing materials for the new building. The master of’ the works is
ordered “gyf the tymmer of the Auld Tolbuith will serve for the wark of the New
Tolbuith, to tak the same as ma serve.” In consequence of the proceedings, in
obedience to this order, the renters of the neighbouring booths appear with no very gentle
remonstrance against him, complaining “ that presentlie the maister of wark was takand
away the jeists above their buthis, quhilk jeists had been bocht be thame, and laid thair,
and wes thair awin propir guddis.” The magistrates seem to have pacified them with a
’ Council Register, 3d Sept. 1561. Keith, vol. U. p. 81, 82. Kuox’a Hist., p. 269, Herriea’ Mem., p. 56. ... V. TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARY. 71 each of them frankly disclosing opinions, involviig the causes ‘of the ...

Book 10  p. 77
(Score 0.27)

  Previous Page Previous Results   Next Page More Results

  Back Go back to Edinburgh Bookshelf

Creative Commons License The scans of Edinburgh Bookshelf are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.