?4 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
Queen’ Mary had ever been present at the Assembly of the Estates, and its proceedings
were conducted with unusual pomp. The Queen rode in procession to the Tolbooth, in
robes of state, with the crown, sceptre, and sword borne before her, escorted by a brilliant
cavalcade, and was hailed with loyal greetings as she passed along the High Street,
The hall was crowded with the nobles and other members, in their most costly habiliments,
and glit,tered with the gay trappings of the royal household, and the splendour
and beauty of the Court, that surrounded the throne. The Queen opened the proceedings
with an address which won the favour of her audience, no less than her extreme beauty,
so that the people were heard to exclaim, Did ever orator
speak so sweetly?” On three succeeding days she rode thus to the Tolbooth, greatly to
the dissatisfaction of the preachers, who spoke boldly “ against the superfluities of their
clothes,” and at length presented articles for regulating apparel and reforming other
similar enormities.’
It may be mentioned, as characteristic of the times, that the Town Council, “ for the
satisfaction of many devout citizens, and to prevent the crime of fornication,” enacted,
about the same period, that all guilty of this crime should be ducked in a certain part
of the North Loch, then an impure pond of stagnant water, and a pillar was erected
there for the more efficient execution of such sentences. The punishment, however, was
not always reserved for such carnal offenders, but was also enforced against the moat
zealous adherents of the ancient faith. In the month of August, a serious disturbance
occurred, in consequence of the Queen’s domestics at Holyrood being found, during her
absence at Stirling, attending mass at the chapel there. Patrick Cranston, “ a zealous
brother,” as Knox styles him, entered the chapel, and finding the altar covered, and
R priest ready to celebrate mass, he demanded of them how they dared thus openly to
break the laws of the land? The magistrates were summoned, and peace restored with
difficulty.
A much more serious display of popular intolerance was exhibited in the year 1565.
The period appointed by the ministers of the Congregation for the celebration of the comregarded
as a peculiar aggravation of the crime of “ massing,’’ when it was done at the
same time as they were administering the sacrament, the indignation of the reformers
was greatly excited by the customary services of the Roman Catholics at this period.
A party of them, accordingly, headed by one of the bailies, seized on Sir James Tarbat, a
Catholic priest, as he was riding home, after officiating at the altar. He was imprisoned
in the Tolbooth, along with several of his assistants; but the populace, not content to
abide the course of law, brought him forth, clothed in his sacerdotal garments, and with
the chalice secured in his hand. He was placed on the pillory at the Market Cross, and
exposed for an hour to the pelting of the rude rabble ; the boys serving him, according to
Knox, with his Easter eggs. He was brought to trial with his assistants on the following
day, and convicted of having celebrated mass, contrary to law. He was again exposed for
four hours on the pillory, under the charge of the common hangman, and ao rudely
treated that he was reported to be dead.
The Queen, justly exasperated at this cruel and insulting proceeding, sent to her friends
God save that sweet face I
. muuion chanced to fall at the season of Easter, and as it seems to have been at all times
.
a Rnox’a Hist., p. 295. Keith, voL ii. p. 199.