THE WEST BOW AND SUBURBS. 351
over the principal door were those of Britain after the Union of the Crowns.
stones, above the windows, were five emblematical representations :- .
On triangular
And in these five, such thing8 their form expresa’d.
As we can touch, taste, feel, or hear, or see.
A variety of the Virtues also were strewed upon different parts of the building. In one
place was a rude representation of our h s t parents, and underneath the well-known old
proverbial distich :-
When Adam delved and Eve Bpan,
Quhair war a’ the gentlea than !
In another place was a head of Julius Csesar, and elsewhere a head of Octavius Secundus,
both in good preservation.” Many of these sculptures were recklessly defaced and
broken, and the whole of them dispersed. Among those we have examined there is one,
now built over the doorway of Gillespie’s School, having a tree cut on it, bearing for
fruit the stars and crescents of the family arms, and the inscription DOMINUS EST ILLU-
~ A T I OME A ; another, placed over the Hospital Well, has this legend below a boldly
cut heraldic device, CONSTANTIA ET LABORE . 1339. On two others, nom at Woodhouselee,
are the following, BEATUS VIR QUI SPERAT IN DEO . 1450 . and PATRIB ET POSTERIS . 1513 .
Altogether there were probably included in the decorations of this single building more
quaint and curious allegories and inscriptions than are now left to reward our investigation
among all the antiquities of the Old Town. The only remains of this singular mansion
that have escaped the general wreck, are the sculptured pediments and heraldic carvings
built into the boundary walls of the Hospital; and a few others, referred to above, which
were secured by the late Lord Woodhouselee, and now adorn a ruin on Mr Tytler’s
estate at the Pentlands. An examination of these s&ces to show that no dependence
can be placed on the date referred to by Cadmon in fixing the age of the building, as the
whole are in the florid style that prevailed in the reign of James VI., and were no doubt
cut at one period as a durable memorial of the family tree.’ Maitland, after refuting the
popular derivation of the name of Wrychtishousis, from the supposed fact of the mights
or carpenters having dwelt there while cutting down the oaks of the Borough Muir,
assigns it as the mansion of the Laird of Wite.’ That, however, is merely reasoning in
a circle, and deriving its name from itself; but no better explanation seems now discoverable.
Only one other suburban district remaina to be included in our sketch of the old Scottish
Capital. Villages and hamlets have indeed been embraced within its modern exten-
1 A minute account of these, with accurate facsimiles of sevend of them, will be found in “The History of the Partition
of the LennoL” The author shows that from the earliest records no evidence leads to the idea of any connection
between the ownem of Merchiaton and Wrychtiihouaie, notwithstanding their common name. Their arms are quite
distinct, until 1513-the memorable year of Flodden-when one of the heraldic sculpturea shows an alliance between
the Laird of Wrychtishousis and a daughter of Merchiston. The author, however, does not notice the fact that on the
family vault in St Oiles’e Church, the arms of both families are cut, not impaled, but on two distinct, though attached
shields, and with the Merchiaton crest. He h a been driven to some very ingenious and learned theories to account
for a shield bearing three crescents on the field, which he found-where it ought to b-t Woodhouselee, Mng the
arms of the present owner of t h how.
a Maitland, p. 508.-Thia derivation is deduced erroneously from the boundaries of the Borough Muir, aa given by
himself, where he has printed in the possessive case and aa two worda, what should evidently read, “The Laird of
Wryteshouse,” a~ in the previous sentence, “ The Laird of Marchiston.”-Ibid, p. 177.