kii PR EFA CE.
recbrds’, as well as to niany others, whose obliging assistance has in vaGous ways lightened
the labour of the work. In
searching for the charters and title-deeds of old mansions, by which alone accurate and
trustworthy information could in many cases be obtained, I have met with the frankest
co-operation from strangers, to whom my sole introduction was the object of research i
while the just appreciation of such courtesy has been kept alive by the surly or supercilious
rebuffs with which I was occasionally arrested in similar inquiries. Some of the latter have
been amusing enough. On one occasion access to certain title-deeds of an ancient property
was denied in a very abrupt manner, while curiosity was whetted meanwhile by the information,
somewhat testily volunteered, that the deeds were both ancient and very curious.
All attempts to mollify the dragon who guarded these antiquarian treasures proving
unavailing, the search had to be abandoned ; but I learned afterwards, that the old tenement
which had excited my curiosity-and which, except to an antiquary, seemed hardly
worth a groat-was then the subject of litigation between two Canadian clairnanh to’ the
heirship of the deceased Scottish laird; and the unconscious archEeologist had been set
down as the agent of some Yankee branch of the Quirk-Gammon-and-Snap school of legal
practitioners I
If is impossible, indeed, to do more than allude to these.
In acknowledging the assistance I have been favoured with, I must not omit to notice
that of my friend Mr Jamea Drummond, A.R.S.A., to whose able pencil the readers owe
the view in the interior of St Giles’s Church, which forms the vignette at the head of the
last chapter. To the Rev. John Sime, I am also indebted for the drawing of the groundplan
of St Giles’s Church, previous to the recent alterations, an engraving of which illustrates
the Appendix ; and to the very accurate. pencil of Mr William Douglas, for several
of the inscriptions which illustrate that peculiar feature of our ancient buildings. The
remainder of the vignettes are from my own sketches, unless where other sources are stated,
and for the correctness of these I am responsible, nearly the whole of them having been
drawn on the wood with my own hand.
- It may be desirable to state, that the historical sketch comprised in the first seven
chapters of the Work was written, and heady all through the press, before I found t h e to
arrange a large collection of materials in the form in which they are now presented in the
Second Part. I have accordingly, in one or two cases, somewhat modified my earlier views.
The opinion expressed on p. 50, for example, as to the total destruction of the whole private
buildings of the town in 1544, I am now.shtisfied is erroneous,’-and various edifices are
PREFACE. xiii
accordingly described in succeeding chaptkrs; the walls of which evidently suffered no very
great injury from that des tructive conff aption. . .
I am far from conceiving that the materials for an antiquarian history of Edinburgh are
exhausted, ,though probably .nearly all has now been gleaned from traditional sources to
which any worth can be attached. There is, indeed, no lack of such legeuds to those who
clioose to go in search of them. The Scottish antiquary finds an amount of sympathy in
his pursuit among the peasantry and the lower classes of the town population,. wlich,
however it be accounted for, he will look for in vain among the more educated, as a class.
The tenants of the degraded dwellings of the old Holyrood aristocracy cherish the memory
of their titled predecessors with a zeal that would do credit to the most accomplished
editor of the Blue Book. One half of the old wives of Edinburgh prove, on evidence
which it would be dangerous to dispute, that their .crazy mansions were once the abodes of
royalty, or the palaces of Scottish grandees, while the monotony of hackneyed tales of
Queen’ Mary and Cromwell-the popular hero and heroine of such romances-is occasionally
varied by the ingenious embellishments of some more practised story-teller,
Modern local traditions, however; are like the moden antiques of our ballad books ; their
genealogy is more difficult to trace than the evidence of their spuriousness. One might,
indeed, pardon the fictions of antiquarian romancers, if they brought to the aid of the
memorialist such skilful forgeries as Chatterton furnished to the too credulous historian of
Bristol ; finding in the unfailing treasures of the .old muniment chest of St Mary’s Retcliffe,
and the versatile parchments of (( The gode prieste RomZey,” whatever the diligent
antiquary wished to discover I The exorcisms of such disenchantera as the modern architect
of St Giles’s, however, have put to flight more pleasant facts, and fictions too, than the
inventive genius even of a Chatterton can restore ; while popular periodical literature,
diluted into halfpenny worths of novelette and romance, has so poisoned the pure old
springs of tradition, that one detects in the most unsophisticated grand-dame tales of
the present day, some adulteration from the manufactory of the literary hack. This
it is which makes it so reasonable SL source of regret, that Arnot should have stalked
through the parlieus of Old Edinburgh, elevated on historic stilts, at a time when a
description of what lay around him, and a relation of the fireside gossip of the stately
old Scottish dames of the eighteenth century, would have snatched from oblivion 8
. thousand curious reminiscences, now altogether beyond recall. To a very different
and much less attractive source, we are compelled to turn for the chance of recovering
‘
