Edinburgh Bookshelf

Edinburgh Bookshelf

Search

Index for “elizabeth graham”

102 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES.
Peerage by patent dated December 21st of that year, by the title of Viscount
Melville, of Melville, in the county of Edinburgh, and Baron Dunira, in the
county of Perth.
Neither the important services which Lord Melville had rendered his country,
nor his own well-known disinterested and generous nature, could protect him
from a prosecution-persecution we had nearly said-instituted ostensibly on
the grounds of public justice, but which was carried on with a spirit of bitterness,
that, to say the least of it, was calculated to create serious doubts as to the
purity of the motives of those with whom it originated.
On the 8th of April 1805, his lordship, who had previously held for a short
time the appointment of First Lord of the Treasury, was accused in the House
of Commons, by Mr. Whitbread, of having misapplied or misdirected certain
sums of public money, with a view to his own private advantage and emolument.
Articles of impeachment having been preferred, his lordship was brought to trial
before his Peers in Westminster Hall, on the 29th of April 1806. The result
was a triumphant acquittal (12th June following) from all the charges. In
truth, the utmost extent of any blame imputable to him was, that he had placed
too much confidence in some of the subordinates in his office.
After his acquittal, Lord Melville was restored to his place in the Privy
Council, from which he had been removed pending his trial, but he did not
again take office. From this period he lived chiefly in retirement, participating
only occasionally in the debates of the House of Lords.
His lordship died very unexpectedly in the house of his nephew, Lord Chief
Baron Dundas, in George Square, on the 29th May 181 1 ; hTing come to
Edinburgh, it is believed, to attend the funeral of his old friend Lord President
Blair, who had died suddenly a few days before, and was at the moment lying
in the house adjoining that in which Lord Melville expired.
His Lordship was distinguished in his public life by a singular capacity for
business, by unwearjed diligence in the discharge of his numerous and important
duties, and, as a speaker, by the force and acuteness of his reasoning. In private
life his manners were affable and unaffected, his disposition amiable and
affectionate. A striking instance of the kindliness of his nature is to be found in
the fact, that to the latest period of his life, whenever he came to Edinburgh, he
made a point of visiting all the old ladies with whom he had been acquainted in
his early days, patiently and perseveringly climbing, for this purpose, some of the
most formidable turnpike-stairs in the Old Town. In his person he w-as tall
and well-formed, while his countenance was expressive of high intellectual
endowments.
The city of Edinburgh contains two public monuments to Lord Melville's
memory. The one, a marble statue by Chantrey, which stands in the large hall
of the Parliament House; the other a handsome column, one hundred and
thirty-five feet high, situated in the centre of St. Andrew's Square. This noble
pillar is surmounted by a statue of his lordship, fifteen feet in height.
Lord Melville married first, Elizabeth, daughter of David Rannie, Esq., of ... BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. Peerage by patent dated December 21st of that year, by the title of Viscount Melville, ...

Book 8  p. 149
(Score 0.88)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 283
his journey with the greater facility, on application by the Society to the Board
of Customs, the Prince of Walea brig, Captain John Campbell, was ordered
to be in readiness at Oban for his use. In this vessel Dr. Kemp navigated with
safety the dangerous creeks and sounds of the Western Isles-went round the
point of Ardnamurchan, which stretches far into the western ocean, and is
constantly beat by a turbulent sea-and visited all the islands of the Hebrides.
This extensive tour he accomplished in three months ; and, on his return,
presented a very excellent Report to the Society, not only as to the state of the
schools and missions in general, but as to the cause of the destitution experienced
in many of the districts, and the means by which it might be alleviated.
The views entertained on the various topics embraced by the Report, and the
remedial measures which it pressed on the attention of the Society, were at once
liberal and enlightened, and displayed a thorough acquaintance with the capacities
of the people and the resources of the country.
Wherever
he went during his Highland tours he was exceedingly well received, and obtained
the ready co-operation of all whose influence could possibly be of service.
Even in those remote islands, where the Reformation had never penetrated, and
where Roman Catholicism maintained undisputed sway, the Secretary had the
singular address to procure the aid and friendship of the clergy of that persuasion.
While visiting the peasantry, it was no uncommon thing for him to be
accompanied by the priest of the district, whose influence was highly necessary
in breaking down the common prejudice against sending their children to the
schools of a Protestant association.
First to a Miss Simpson, by whom he
had a son and daughter; secondly, to Lady Mary Anne Carnegie (who died
in 1798), daughter of the sixth Earl of Northesk; and, thirdly, to Lady Elizabeth
Hope, daughter of John second Earl of Hopetoun.
His son (who was a manufacturer) married a daughter of Sir James
Colquhoun of Luss, Sheriff-depute of Dumbartonshire-a connection which
unhappily gave rise to proceedings of a rather singular nature.’ Old Sir James,
becoming jealous of his own lady and Dr. Kemp, actually raised an action of
divorce against her, which, of course, equally affected the character of the Doctor ;
and, if successful, would have subjected him in heavy damages. While this
novel case of litigation was pending in Court, death very suddenly stepped in to
give it the quietus, by removing the two principal actors in the drama, within
a few days of each other. The deaths of Sir James and the Doctor are thus
recorded in the newspaper obituaries for 1805 :-“April 18. At Weirbank
House, nearMelrose, of a stroke of palsy, aged sixty, the Rev. John Kemp; D.D.,
Dr. Kemp possessed very conciliatory and engaging manners.
Dr. Kemp was three times married.
In the “ Town Eclogue,” the author (a clergyman) speaking of this marriage and Dr. Kemp’s
alleged familiarity with Lady Colquhoun, says-
“ To a weaver’s arms consigns the high born Miss ;
Then greets the mother with a holy kiss.”
The remainder of the attack is so scurrilous that we refrain from inserting it. ... SKETCHES. 283 his journey with the greater facility, on application by the Society to the Board of ...

Book 8  p. 397
(Score 0.86)

64 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
including the Earls of Argyle and Glencairn, and the Lord James Stewart. The place of
meeting was the Quarry Holes, or as it is not inappropriately styled by the writers of the
time, the Quarrel Holes ; a famous place of meeting for duels and private rencontres, at
the east end of the Calton Hill, in the immediate neighbourhood of the Palace of Holyrood-
and there the two first-named Earls engaged, that should the Regent fail to fulfil
the conditions of agreement, and especially that of the dismissal of the French troops, they
would willingly join forces with them to enforce their fulfilment.‘
Although the main body of the reformers had withdrawn from
Edinburgh, Nome of the leaders continued to reside there, and the
people refused to yield up St Giles’s Church to be again used for
means, to recover it. She had already received notice of further
assistance coming from France, and did not choose to provoke a
quarrel till thus reinforced. As one means of driving them from
the church, the French soldiers made it a place of promenade during
the time of service, to the great disturbance of the Congregation. But though the preacher,
Mr Willocks, denounced them in no measured terms from the pulpit, and publicly prayed
God to rid them of guch locusts, the people prudently avoided an open rupture, (‘ except
that a horned cap was taken off a proud priest’s head, and cut in four quarters, because
he said he would wear it in spite of the Congregation.”
In the month of September 1559, Sir Ralph Sadler arrived at Berwick from Queen
Elizabeth, and entered into secret negotiations with the reformers, paying over to them,
for their immediate use, the sum of two thousand pounds, with the promise of further
pecuniary assistance, for the purpose of expelling the French from Scotland, so that it
could be managed with such secrecy as not to interfere with the public treaties between
the two nations.
The Queen had
already received a reinforcement of a thousand French troops, who disembarked at Leith
in the end of August, and with their aid she immediately proceeded to enlarge and complete
the fortifications of that port, while she renewed her entreaties to the French Court
for further aid.
Shortly after, the Bishop of Amiens arrived at Edinburgh, aN legate from the Pope, and
earnestly laboured to reconcile the reformers to the Church ; but any little influence he
might possibly have had, was destroyed in their eyes by the discovery that he had arrived
in company with a second body of French auxiliaries.
The Congregation at length marched to Edinburgh, towards the end of October, with
a force amounting to twelve thousand men, resolved to dislodge the French garrison from
Leith ; and the same day the Regent hastily retreated from Holyrood Palace, and took up
her residence within the protection of the fortifications at Leith.
The Congregation proceeded in the most systematic manner,-conmittees were chosen
for the direction of civil and religious affairs, and a letter was immediately addressed to the
,
I the service of the mass, although the Regent sought, by various
The preparations for war were now diligently pursued by both parties.
* Bishop Keith, vol. i. p. 224. * Calderwood, vol. i. p. 502.
VIQNETTE--COFbel from the old south door of St ailea’a Church. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. including the Earls of Argyle and Glencairn, and the Lord James Stewart. The place ...

Book 10  p. 69
(Score 0.85)

20 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES.
mutual improvement in public speaking, formed themselves into a debating
club, called the Speculative fiociety, which met in one of therooms of the College.
This association soon became more extensive, and assumed an aspect of
stability and eminence, which it still continues to maintain. Mr. Maconochie
was then in his seventeenth year, and his associates were all nearly of a
similar age.’
In 1768, after having completed his studies at the University, he went to
the Continent, and resided some time at Paris. On his return the following
yea?, he entered himself a student at Lincoln’s Inn, and kept several termshis
object being to attend the Court of King’s Bench, in order to observe the
decisions of the great Lord Mansfield.
Retnrning to Scotland, Mr. Maconochie was admitted a member of the
Faculty of Advocates upon the 8th of December 1770 ja but, being still desirous
of increasing his general and practical knowledge, he soon after made a second
journey to France, where he remained till 1773. During his stay there he
chiefly resided at Rheims; but the greater portion of his time was spent in
visiting various parts of the country.
In 1774 he married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Wellwood, Esq., of
Garvock, in the county of Fife. Through the influence of this connection it
is supposed he owed his return to the General Assembly of that year, as layrepresentative
of the burgh of Dunfermline-a point of considerable importance
to a young barrister j as, should he be fortunate enough to make a successful
debut in the ecclesiastical court, his future success is generally looked upon
as certain.a
From this period the reputation of Mr. Maconochie began gradually to be
established. In addition to the practice of law, and a thorough acquaintance
with the Statute-book, he had studied deeply the philosophy of law ; and such
was the character which his talents and acquirements had secured for him, that,
in 1779,’ on the resignation of Mr. Balfour, he was elected Professor of the
Law of Nature and Nations in the University of Edinburgh. Much to the
regret of the public, however, he gave lectures only during two sessions, his
It is curious to notice the contemptuous opinion entertained of the Speculative Society at its
commencement. For instance, one publication says-“ A trifling club is set up under the name of
the SpeculatiTe Society.”
He was examined on Tit. xiv. Lib. xxxvii. Pand. de jure Patronatus, and found “sufficiently
qualXed.”-MX. Miiiutm of Fac. of Advocates.
Probably the earliest appearance made by the subject of this sketch waa in the important case
of Hinton w. Donaldson and others, in which his father was mandatory for the pursuer, where the
question of copyright, and the exclusive right of authors to their works, was discussed. The six
counsel for the parties were heard at great length before the whole Court, and Mr. Maconochie distinguished
himself on this occasion a8 an able pleader. The Court, with the exception of Lord
Monboddo, was against the claims advanced for the authors ; and, on the 28th of July 1773, decided
against Hinton. A Report of the Speeches of the Judges was printed by James Boswell (afterwards
the biographer of Johnson), one of the counsel for the defenders. ‘ On the 18th December 1779, upon the resignation of Mr. James Balfour, Mr. Maconochie was
elected treasurer of the Faculty of Advocates.
Edinburgh, 1774. &o. ... BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. mutual improvement in public speaking, formed themselves into a debating club, called ...

Book 9  p. 26
(Score 0.84)

352 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
sions, or swept away to make room for the formal streets and squares of the New Town;
but these are the offspring of another parentage, though claiming a part among the memorials
of the olden time. At the foot of Leith Wynd-and just without the ancient boundaries
of the capital, lies an ancient suburb, which though at no time dignified by the abodes of
the nobility, or even of citizens of note, was selected as the site of several early religious
foundations that still confer some interest on the locality. The foot of the Wynd (the only
portion which now remains) was remarkable as the scene of one of those strange acts of lawless
violence, which were of such frequent occurrence in early times. John Graham, parson of
Killearn, one of the supreme criminal Judges, having married the widow of Sandilands of
Calder, instituted a vexatious law-suit against her son. The partizans of the latter probably
considered it vain to compete with a lawyer at his own weapons, and his uncle, Sir James
Sandilands, accompanied by a body of his friends and followers, lay in wait for the Judge on
the 1st of February 1592, in the wynd, which then formed one of the principal avenues to
the town, and avenged their quarrel by murdering him in open day, without any of the perpetrators
being brought to trial or punishment.’ At the foot of the wynd stood the building
known as Paul’s Work, rebuilt in 1619, on the site of an ancient religibus foundation.
About the year 1479, Thomas Spence, Bishop of Aberdeen, founded an hospital there, for
the reception and entertainment of twelve poor men, and dedicated it to the Virgin Mary,
under the name of the Hospital of our Lady in Leith Wynd, and it subsequently received
considerable augmentations to its revenues from other benefactors. It is probable that
among these benefactions there had been a chapel or altar dedicated to St Paul, unless,
indeed, this was included in the original charter of foundation.’ All these documents,
however, are now lost, and we are mainly left to conjecture as to the source of the change
of name which early took place. In 1582 the Common Council adapted this charitable
foundation to the new order of things, and drew up statutes for the guidance. of the
Bedemen, wherein it is required that, “in Religion they be na Papistes, bot of the trew
Religi~n.”~S ubsequently the whole revenues were diverted to purposes never dreamt of
by the pious founders. The buildings having probably fallen intp decay, were reconstructed
as they now appear, and certain Dutch manufacturers were invited over from Delft,
and established there for the instruction of poor girls and boys in the manufacturing of
woollen stuffs. The influence of these strangers in their legitimate vocation failed of eEect,
but Calderwood records in 1621, ‘‘ Manie of the profainner sort of the toun were drawen
out upon the sixt of May, to May games in Gilmertoun and Rosseline; so profanitie
began to accompanie superstition and idolatrie, as it hath done in former times. Upon
the first of May, the weavers in St Paul’s Worke, Englishe and Dutche, set up a
highe May pole, with their garlants and bells hanging at them, wherat was great concurse
Arnot’s Criminal Trials, p. 174.
“Feb. 7, 1696.-Reduction pursued by the Town of Edinburgh against Sir Wm. Binny, and other partnera of the
Linen Manufactory in Paul’s Work, of the tack set to them of the same in 1683. Insisted lmo, that this house was
founded by Thos. Spence, Bishop of Aberdeen, in the reign of King James II., for discipline and training of idle vagabonds,
and dedicated to 9t Paul ; and by an Act of Council in 1626, was destinate aud mortified for educating boys in B
woollen manufactory; and this tack had inverted the origiual design, contrary to the 6th Act of Parliament, 1633,
discharging the sacrilegious inveraion of all pious donations.”-Fountainhall’s Decisions, vol. i. p. 709. “ There WM a
hospital and chapel, dedicated to St Paul, in Edinburgh ; aud there waa in the chapel an altar and chaplainry conaecrated
to the Virgin ; of which Sir William Knolls, the preceptor of Torphichen, claimed the patronage before the Privy Council,
in 1495.”-ParI. Rec. 472. Caledonia, vol. ii. p. 471. * Maitland, pp. 468-9. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. sions, or swept away to make room for the formal streets and squares of the New ...

Book 10  p. 385
(Score 0.84)

62 MEMORIALS OP EDINB UR GH.
land, romed in the mind of Elizabeth that vindictive jealousy, which so largely contributed
to all the miseries that attended the course of Mary of Scotland, from the first moment of
her return to her native land.
From this time forward a fatal change took place in the policy of the Queen Regent.
She abandoned the moderate measures which her own natural disposition inclined her to ;
she lent herself en’tirely to the ambitious projects of the French Court and the Chiefs of
the house of Guise, and the immediate result was a collision between the Catholic and
Protestant parties. Some concessions had been granted at the request of the Lords of
the Congregation ; but now these were entirely withdrawn, a proclamation was issued for
conformity of religion, and several of the leaders of the reforming party were summoned
A provincial synod, worthy of notice, as the last ever held in Scotland during Roman
Catholic times, was convened on the 2d of March, this year, in the Blackfriare’ Church,
Edinburgh, to consult what wae required for the safety of the Church thus endangered.
Resolutions were passed for the amendment of life in the clergy, and the removal of other
crying abuses ; but it can hardly be wondered at that their general tone was by no means
conciliatory ; the decrees of the Council of Trent were again declared obligatory ; the use of
any other language than Latin, in the services of the Church, was expressly forbid ; and,
by an act of this same synod, Sir David Lindsay’R writings were denounced, and ordered
to be burnt.’ According to Calderwood, this, the last synod ‘of the Church, was dissolved
on the 2d of May, the same day that John Knox arrived at Leith,-too striking a coincidence
to be overlo~ked.~
The conducting of the public religious services in an unknown language had long
excited opposition ; and the popularity of such writings as those of Dunbar, Douglas, and
Lindsay, in the vernacular tongue, doubtless tended to increase the general desire for its
u8e in the services of the Church, as well as on all public occasions.
In Kitteis Confeessioun, a satirical poem ascribed to Sir David Lindsay, the dog-lath of
an ignorant father-confeseor is alluded to with sly humourto
answer for their past deeds.‘ . . I
He speirit monie strange case,
How that my lufe did me embrace,
Quhat day, how oft, quhat sort, and quhair 1
Quod he, I wad I had been thair.
He me absolvit for ane plack,
Thocht he with me na price wald rnak ;
And rnekil Latine did he mummill;
I heard na thing bot Aumrnill burnmill.
The poet was already in his grave when his writings were thus condemned. The last
years of hie life had been spent in retirement, and the exact time of his death is unknown,
but‘Henry Charteris, the famous printer, who published Lindsay’s works in 1568, says
that This occurred
in 1558, from which it may be inferred, that he died towards the cloae of the previous
year, 1557.4
shortly after the death of Sir David, they burnt auld Walter Mill.”
1 Tytler, vol. vi. pp 109,110. Pitscottie, vol. ii. p. 526. * Calderwood, vol. i. p. 438. ’ Chalmera’ Sir D. Lindsay, vol. i p. 42. Keith, vol. i p. 156. ... MEMORIALS OP EDINB UR GH. land, romed in the mind of Elizabeth that vindictive jealousy, which so largely ...

Book 10  p. 67
(Score 0.84)

THE LA WNMARKET. 183
courage failed them, and they marched hastily home again without having even seen the
enemy. This corps of martial burghers became a favourite butt for the Jacobite wits ; and,
among other proofs of their self-devoted zeal, it transpired that the gallant penman had
secured within his waistcoat the professional breastplate of a quire of paper, and prepared
himself for his expected fate by affixing thereon a label, inscribed,--“ This is the body of
Andrew Maclure, let it be decently interred,” in the hope that he might thereby be secure
of Christian burial !
Before closing the chapter, we may add that the Lawnmarket appears to have been,
at all periods, a place of residence for men of note. In 1572 Mr Henry Killigrew, the
ambassador of Queen Elizabeth, arrived at Edinburgh to congratulate the Earl of Morton
on his accession to the Regency,”when he ‘‘ depairtit to Dauid Forrestaris lugeing abone
the tolbuith,” ’ in the same neighbourhood as the mansion in Old Bank Close, soon afterward
occupied by Sir William Durie. So long as Edinburgh continued to be the seat of
the Scottish Parliament, its vicinity to the Parliament House made the Lawnmarket be
selected as a favourite place of residence, as appears from numerous passing allusions to
the old nobility, though the particular houses referred to cannot now be traced. Defoe,
for example,-who was resident in Edinburgh at the period,-tells us in his history of the
Union, that on the 28th October 1706, the Parliament sat late, and the Parliament Close
was so full of people waiting the result of their decision, that the members could scarcely
get out. On this occasion the Duke of Hamilton, the popular favourite, who was usually
conducted in triumph by the mob to his lodgings in the Abbey, iL on leaving the house,
was carried up to the Lawnmarket, and so to the lodgings of the Duke of Atholl,” who
was appointed, as Loclchart tells us, in the place of the Duke of Queensberry at the
beginning of this session of parliament, the latter wishing to see the course of public
affairs before he ventured himself to face the difficulties of that period, ‘‘ and therefore he
sent the Duke of Atholl down as Commissioner, using hi& as the monkey did the cat
in pulling out the hot roasted chestnuts.”‘ Here also was the house of Sir Patrick
Johnston, the city member,-tradition points out the old land still standing at the head
of Johnston’s Close:-which was attacked and gutted by the same excited mob, in their
indignation at his favouring the unpopular measure of the Union.
l Adjoining Mr Yaclure’s house waa the Baijen Hole, an ancient and once celebrated baker’s shop 1 The origin of
this epithet haa puzzled our local historiana, but it occurs in Crawfurd’a History of the Univemity of Edinburgh, BB
applied to the junior class of Students, whose patronage, above a century ago, of a famed apeciea of rolls manufactured
there, under the name of Souter’r CZods, had doubtlesa led to this title fer the place, which resembled the high shqpr
still remaining underneath the oldest houses of the High Street.
Craufurd’s Memoirs, p. 244.
This we have on the authority of an old man, a pewterer, who haa been an inhabitant of Xhe Bow for the last Wty
8 Diurnal of Occurrenta, p. 313. 4 Lockhart’s Hems. p. 139.
yearn. ... LA WNMARKET. 183 courage failed them, and they marched hastily home again without having even seen the enemy. ...

Book 10  p. 201
(Score 0.84)

YAMES l? TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MAR Y. 63
The reforming party now proceeded to those acts of violence, which led to the destmction
of nearly all the finest ecclesiastical buildings throughout Scotland. The Queen
Regent, on learning of their proceedings at Perth and elsewhere, wrote to the Provost and
Magistrates of Edinburgh, requiring them to defend the town, and not suffer the Earl of
Argyle and the Congregation to enter-offering the aid of her French troops for their
defence. But this the Magistrates declined, declaring that the entire populace were
prepared to favour that party, and could not be restrained by them. Upon receiving this
reply, the Regent thereupon withdrew with her French guard from Holyrood Abbey, and
retreated towards Dunbar.
The Magistrates, though unable to resist this popular movement, exerted themselves to
the utmost to restrain its violence. They sent a deputation to the leaders of the reforming
party, entreating them to spare both their churches and religious houses,-the former to be
continued in use as places of Protestant worship, and the latter as seminaries of learning.
They also placed a guard of sixty men for the protection of St Giles’s Church, and, as a
further security, removed the carved stalls of the choir-within the safer shelter of the
Tolbooth j’ and such was the zeal they displayed, that the Regent afterwards wrote them
a letter of thanks for their services. Yet their efforts were only attended with very partial
mccess. Upon the first rumour of the approach of the Earl of Argyle, the populace
attacked both the monasteries of the Black and Grey Friars, destroying everything they
contained, and leaving nothing but the bare walls standing2
When the Earl of Argyle entered the town with his followers, they immediately proceeded
to the work of purification, as it was styled. Trinity College Church, and the
prebendal buildings attached to it, were assailed, and some parts of them utterly destroyed ;
and both St Giles’s Church, and St Mary’s, or the Kirk of Field, were visited, their altars
thrown down, and the images destroyed and burnt. They visited Holyrood Abbey, overthrowing
the altars, and otherwise defacing the church, and removed also from thence
the coining irons of the Nint, compelling the treasurer to deliver up to them a considerable
sum of money in his hands.’
The Regent finding herself unable to resist this formidable party by force, entered into
negotiations with them, for the purpose of gaining time, while they, on the other hand,
corresponded with Queen Elizabeth and besought lier aid ; but the Engll’sh Queen was too
politic to commit herself by openly countenancing a fraction so recently sprung up, and
contented herself with evasive answers to their request, a d many of their adherents
meanwhile falling away, they were compelled to retreat as hastily from the town as they
had entered, on the sudden return of the Regent from Dunbar.
Commissioners from both parties met, and a mutual accommodation was agreed on
between them, and signed by the Earl of Arran and Monsieur d’oysel, on the 25th of
July, at Leith Links, and immediately thereafter the Queen Regent returned and took up
her residence in Holyrood Palace.
One of the chief clauses in this agreement required the dismissal of the French troops j
and with a special view to the enforcement of this, an interview took place on the following
day between the Earls of Arran and Hantly, and some of the leaders of the Congregation,
.
Maitland, p. 16. ’ Calderwood, vol. i. p. 475, ’ Bishop Lealie, p. 275. ... l? TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MAR Y. 63 The reforming party now proceeded to those acts of violence, which led ...

Book 10  p. 68
(Score 0.83)

222 OLD ?AND NEW EDINBURGH. [West Port.
prehending the main street of the West Port (the
link between Fountainbridge and the Grassmarket),
the whole of Lauriston from the Corn-market and
foot of the Vennel to the Main Point, including
Portland Place on the west, and to Bruntsfield
Links on the east, including Home and Leven
Streets.
In IIGO John AbbotofKelso grantedtoLawrence,
the son of Edmund of Edinburgh, a toft situated
between the West Port and the Castle, on the left
of the entrance into the city. In this little burgh
there were of old eight incorporated trades, deriving
their rights from John Touris of Inverleitk
Many of the houses here were roofed with thatch
in the sixteenth century,
and the barriergate
by which the whole
of the district was cut
off from the city was
milt in 1513, as a port
in the ?,F?lodden wall.
Some gate may, however,
have existed previously,
as Balfour in
his ?Annales,? tells that
the head of Robert Graham,
oneof the assassins
of James I., in 1437,
?was sett ouer the West
Port of Edinburgh ;?
and in I 5 I 5 the head of
Peter Moffat, ?ane
greit swerer and thief,?
was spiked in the same
place, after the reins
of government were
that every man in the city ?be reddy boddin for
weir,? in his best armour at ?? the jow of the common
bell? for its defence if necessary. Nearly
similar orders were issued concerning the gates in
1547, and the warders were to be well armed
with jack, steel helmet, and halberd or Jedmood
axe, finding surety to be never absent from their
In 1538 Mary of Guise made her first entry by
the West Port on St. Margaret?s day, ? with greit
trivmphe,? attended by all the nobility (Diurnal of
OCC.). There James VI. was received by ? King
Solomon ? on his first state entry in 1579 ; and by
it Anne of Denmark entcred in 1590, when she was
posts. (Ibid.)
HIGHRIGGS HOUSE, 1854. (Afler P Drawing by Ihr Aidkor.)
assumed by John Duke of Albany. (? Diurnal of
Occurrents.?)
In the same year it was ordained by the magistrates
and council that only three of the city gates
were to be open daily, viz., ?the West Port, Nether
Bow, and the Kirk-of-Field-and na ma. -4nd
ilk port to haif twa porteris daylie quhill my
Lord Govemoure?s hame coming. [Albany was
then on the Borders, putting down Lord Home?s
rebellion.] And thir porteris suffer na maner of
person on hors nor fute, to enter within this toune
without the President or one of the bailies knaw
of their cuming and gif thame licence. And the
said personis to be convayit to thair lugings be one
of the said porteris, swa that gif ony inconvenient
happenis, that thair hoste niycht answer for thame as
efferis.? (Burgh Records.) It was also ordained
that a fourth part of the citizens should form a
watch every night till the return of Albany, and
received by a long Latin
oration, while the garrison
in the Castle
?gave her thence a
great volley of shot,
with their banners and
ancient displays upon
the walls ? (?( Marriage
of James VI.,? Bann.
Club). Here also in
1633, Charles I. at his
grand entrance was
received by the nymph
Edina, and again at the
Overbow by the Lady
Caledonia, both of
whom welcomed him
in copious verse from
the pen, it is said, of
the loyal cavalier and
poet, Drummond of
Hawthornden.
Fifteen years before this period the Common
Council had purchased the elevated ridge of ground
lying south of the West Port and Grassmarket,
denominated the Highriggs, on a part of which
Heriot?s Hospital was afterwards built, and the
most recent extension of the city wall then took
place for the purpose of enclosing it. A portion of
this wall still fomis the boundary of the hospital
grounds, terminating at the head of the Vennel, in
the only tower of the ancient fortifications now
remaining.
In 1648 the superiority of the Portsburgh was
bought by the city from Sir Adam Hepburn for
the sum of 27,500 merks Scots; and in 1661
the king?s stables were likewise purchased for
EI,OOO Scots, and the admission of James Baisland
to the freedom of Edinburgh.
In 1653 the West Port witnessed a curious
, scene, when Lieutenant-Colonel Cotterel, by order ... OLD ?AND NEW EDINBURGH. [West Port. prehending the main street of the West Port (the link between ...

Book 4  p. 222
(Score 0.83)

418 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES.
addressed from the bar ; and entered either on the margin of the papers, or in
a blank paper book, the opinion of each judge as it was delivered. In the
Criminal and Jury Courts, where he presided, he recorded the evidence that
was adduced with remarkable precision and accuracy, omitting what was really
extraneous, but preserving everything in the slightest degree important.
Though necessarily resident in Edinburgh during the greater portion of the year,
he took a deep interest in whatever related to his native county, and was at
all times a ready adviser in cases affecting its welfare. His paternal estate of
Shewalton, to which he succeeded on the death of his elder brother, John Boyle,
Esq., is situated within a mile or two of Irvine, and has long been distinguished
for a full participation in those agricultural improvements which have probably
. been nowhere carried to a greater degree of perfection than in Ayrshire. His
lordship was a member of the Privy Council. In 1841 he was promoted to the
presidentship on the retirement of the Right Hon. Charles Hope.
The Lord President was twice married; first, on the 24th December 1804,
to Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Alexander Montgomery of Annick, brother of
Hugh Earl of Eglinton, of which union there were several children.' Upon the
demise of this amiable lady, his lordship married, secondly (11th July 1827),
Camilla, eldest daughter of the late Lord Methven, by whom he also had issue.
ADAM GILLIES (LORDG ILLIES)y, oungest son of Robert Gillies, Esq., of
Little Keithock, and brother of the late Dr. Gillies, Historiographer for Scotland,
author of the " Ancient History of Greece," etc.: was born at Brechin, in
the county of Forfar in 1766. He passed advocate in 1787, and was appointed
Sheriff-Depute of the county of Kincardine in 1806. In 181 1 he was elevated
to the bench on the death of Charles Hay (Lord Newton); and, the year
following, succeeded Lord Craig as one of the Lords of Justiciary. In 1816
he was nominated one of the Lords Commissioners of the Jury Court ; and in
1837 appointed Judge of the Court of Exchequer in Scotland. Having on that
occasion resigned his gown as a Lord of Justiciary, he was succeeded by Lord
Cockburn.
Opposed as he was in politics to the party in power in 1811, the elevation
of Mr, Gillies to the bench was a marked tribute to his legal knowledge and
experience at the bar. When the proposal was communicated to him, a limited
time was assigned for his acceptance ; and being wholly unexpected on his part,
he mentioned the circumstance to some of his personal and political friends.
From the standing of Mr. Gillies at the bar, and the large professional income
enjoyed by him, they viewed his elevation to the bench as involving too great
a pecuniary sacrifice on his part j but not coinciding in this opinion, he placed
The eldest of whom, Patrick, born 29th March 1806, and admitted a member of the Faculty of
Advocates in 1829, married, 17thAugust 1830, Mary-Francis, daughter of Sir Robert D. H. Elphinstone,
Bart., of hgie and Elphinstone.
Dr. Gillies died
at Clapham on the 16th of February 1836, in the ninetieth year of his age.
.
Lord Gillies ww by twenty-one yeare the junior of his brother the historian. ... BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. addressed from the bar ; and entered either on the margin of the papers, or in a blank ...

Book 9  p. 559
(Score 0.82)

REGENT MURRAY?S FUNERAL. 143 St. Giles?s Church.]
Beware of injured Rothwellhaugh !
? The death-shot parts-the charger springs-
Wild rises tumult?s startling roar !
And Murray?s plumy helmet rings-
Rings on the ground to rise no mare ! ?
When his remains were committed to the tomb in
which they still lie, the thousands who crowded
the church were moved to tears by the burning
eloquence of Knox. ?Vpoun the xiiij day of the
moneth of Februar, 1570,? says the ? Diurnal of
Occurrents? ? my lord Regentis corpis, being brocht
in ane bote be sey, frz Stirling to Leith, quhair it
was keipit in Johne Wairdlaw his hous, and thereafter
cary it to the Palace of Holyrudhous, wes
transportit fra the said Palace to the College Kirk
the Regent Murray, the Regent Morton, and his
great rival, John Stewart Earl of Athole, are buried ;
and adjoining the aisle where the sorely mangled
remains of the great Marquis of Montrose were
so royally interred on the 7th of January, 1661.
The Regent?s tomb, now fully restored, stands
on the west side of the south transept, and on
many accounts is an object of peculiar interest.
Erected to the memory of one who played so conspicuous
a part in one of the most momentous
periods of Scottish history, it is well calculated to
interference of the General Assembly, and a riot
ensued.
The portion of the church which contained
these monuments was eftered by a door adjoining
the Parliament Close, and, as it was never shut,
?the gude regent?s aisle,? as it was named,
became a common place for appointments and
loungers. Thus French Paris-Queen Mary?o
servant-in his confession respecting the murder
of King Henry, stated that during the communings
which took place before that dark deed was resolved
on, he one day ?took his mantle and sword
and went to prumencr (walk) in the high church.?
Probably in consequence of the veneration entertained
for the memory of the Regent, his tomb
rouse many a stirring association.
All readers of
history know how the Regent
fell under the bullet
of Bothwellhaugh, at Linlithgow,
in avenging the
wrongs inflicted on his
wife, the heiress of Woodhouselee.
As the ?Cadyow
Ballad ? has it-
? ?Mid pennoned spears a stately
Proud Murray?s plumage
Scarce could his trampling
So close the minions crow-
? From the raised vizor?s shade,
Dark rolling, glanced the
And his steel truncheon waved
Seemed marshalling the iron
?But yet his saddened brow
A passing shade of doubt
Some fiend was whispering in
grove,
floated high ;
charger move,
ded nigh.
his eye,
ranks along ;
on high,
throng,
confessed,
and awe ;
his breast,
~
of Sanctgeill, in this manner; that is to say,
.i?illiam Kirkaldie of Grange, Knycht, raid fra the
said palace in dule weid, bearing ane pensal!
quherin was contenit ane Reid Lyon; after him
followit Colvill of Cleishe, Maister (of the) Houshold
to the said Regent, with ane quherin was
contenit my lords regentis armes and bage.? The
Earls of Mar, Athole, Glencairn, the Lords
Ruthven, Methven, and Lindsay, the Master of
Graham, and many other nobles, bore the body
through the church to the grave, where it ?was
JOHN KNOX?S PULPIT, ST. GILES?S.
(From tk Scottish Anfaquarinn Museum).
buryit in Sanct Anthonie?s
yle.? On the front of the
restored tomb is the ancient
brass plate, bearing
an inscription composed
by George Buchanan :-
?( Iur060 Stuvarto, Mwm?e Cornifi,
Scotie Prwqi;
Vim, a t a t i s szw, longe opt*
mo : a6 inirnik,
0mni.- rnemorie deterrimis, ex
insdiis exfindo,
Ceu pafn? commwni, pafna
mcprens $omit.??
Opposite, on the north side
of the west transept, was
the tomb in which the Earl
of Athole, Chancellor of
Scotland, who died suddenly
at Stirling, not without
suspicion of poison,
was interred with great
solemnity on the 4th of
July, 1579. A cross was
used on this occasion, and
as flambeaux were borne,
according to Calderwood,
the funeral probably occurred
at night ; these paraphernalia
led to the usual ... MURRAY?S FUNERAL. 143 St. Giles?s Church.] Beware of injured Rothwellhaugh ! ? The death-shot parts-the ...

Book 1  p. 143
(Score 0.81)

towering mansions again filled with wondering, exulting,
or sorrowing faces, as the wily Earl of BIorton
lays his head under the axe of the ? Maiden,?
and the splendid Montrose, as he is dragged to a
felon?s doom, with the George sparkling on his
breast and the Latin history of his battles tied in
mockery to his neck; again, we shall see Jenny
Geddes hurl her fauldstool at the dean?s head as
he gives out the obnoxious liturgy ; and, anon, the
resolute and sombre Covenanters, grasping their
swords in defence of ?? an oppressed Kirk and a
broken Covenant.?
In the Cowgate-whilom a pleasant country
when the dissolute Darnley was done to death I
in the lonely Kirk-of-field. -
Again we shall see her, when she is led in from
Carberry Hill, a helpless captive in the midst of
her rebel nobles, and thrust-pale, dishevelled,
in tears, and covered with dust-into the gloomy
stone chambers of the famous Black Turnpike,
while the fierce and coarse revilings of the inflamed
multitude made her woman?s heart seem to die
within her.
Turning into the High School Wynd, under the
shadow of its quaint, abutting, and timber-fronted
mansions, we shall meet the Princess-for such she
was-Elizabeth St. Clair of Roslin, surrounded
by the state which Hay records ; for he tells us
that she ?was served (in the days of James 11.)
by seventy-five gentlewomen, whereof fifty-three
were daughters of noblemen, clothed in velvet and
silks, with their chains of gold .and other ornaments,
and was attended by 200 riding gentlemen
in all journeys; and if it happened to be
dark when she went to Edinburgh, where her
lodgings were at the foot of the Blackfriars Wynd,
eighty lighted torches were carried before her.?
Here, in later years, was often seen one who.
was to write of all these things as no man ever
wrote before or since-a little lame boy, fair-haired
and blue-eyed, named Walter Scott, limping to.
school with satchel on back, and playing, it might
be, ? the truant,? with Skene,.by seventy-five gentlewomen, whereof fifty-three
were daughters of noblemen, clothed in velvet and
silks, with their chains of gold .and other ornaments,
and was attended by 200 riding gentlemen
in all journeys; and if it happened to be
dark when she went to Edinburgh, where her
lodgings were at the foot of the Blackfriars Wynd,
eighty lighted torches were carried before her.?
Here, in later years, was often seen one who.
was to write of all these things as no man ever
wrote before or since-a little lame boy, fair-haired
and blue-eyed, named Walter Scott, limping to.
school with satchel on back, and playing, it might
be, ? the truant,? with Skene,.
Again shall be seen the city girt by its loftywalls
and those embattled gates, which were seldom
without a row of human heads on iron spikes-the
grisly relics of those who were too often the victims.
of dire misrule-with the black kites, then thechief
scavengers in the streets, hovering about
them.
In the steep and quaint West Bow-now nearly
all removed-dwelt the Wizard, Weir of Kirkton,
who perished at the stake in 1670, togetherwith
his sister and the wonderful walking-stick, which
was surmounted by a carved head, and performed
his errands. His lofty mansion, long the alleged
abode of spectres, and a source of terror to the
neighbourhood, was demolished only in the spring
of 1878. ... mansions again filled with wondering, exulting, or sorrowing faces, as the wily Earl of BIorton lays his ...

Book 1  p. 3
(Score 0.81)

ECCLESIASTICAL ANTIQUITIES. 407
from the deceased King of Scots’ Palace all or most of his princely library, many books
of which are now at Speke, particularly four large folios, said to contain the Records and
Laws of Scotland at that time. He also brought from the said Palace the Wainscot of
the King’s Hall, and put it up in his own hall at Speke, wherein are seen all the orders
of architecture, as Tuscan, Dorick, Ionick, Corinthian, and Composite ; and round the
top of it this inscription, ‘ SLEEPE . NOT . TILL . YE . HATHE . CONSEDERD . HOW THOW .
WAYS . REPENT . YE.’ ” Speke .Hall still exists as one of the fine old manor-houses
of Lancashire, and could this tradition be relied on would form an object of peculiar
attraction, as the antique wainscot with its quaint moral still adorns the great hall. It
proves, however, to be the work of a later age, corresponding to similar specimens in the
neighbouring halls, erected in the reign of Elizabeth. It might, indeed, be confidently
affirmed, that the Roman orders were not introduced into Scotland till a considerably
later period ; but the above description answers very partially to the original. The tradition,
however, is probably not altogether without foundation. Two figures of angels,
richly gilt, “in form such as are introduced dnder consoles in Gothic architecture,”
formerly surmounted the wainscot, evidently no part of the original design, and these, it
is conjectured, may have been among the spoils which were carried off from the Palace in
1547.8
The Abbey of Holyrood frequently afforded accomniodation to the Scottish Court,
before the addition of a distinct royal dwelling to the ancient monastic buildings, This,
it is probable, was not effected till the reign of Janies IV, It is certain, at any rate, that
large sums were spent by him in building and decorating the Palace during the interval
of four years between his betrothment and marriage to Margaret of England. In the
map to which we have so frequently referred, the present north-west tower, which forms
the only ancient portion of the Palace as it now stands, is shown standing almost apart,
and only joined to the south-west tower of the Abbey Church by a low cloister. To the
south of this appears an irregular group of buildings, of considerable extent, and
apparently covered with tiles, while the whole houses in the Canongate seem, from the
colouring of the drawing, to be only thatched. It is not necessary, however, further to
investigate the early history of the Palace here, as most of the remarkable historicd
incidents associated with it have already been referred to.
The latest writer who has left any account of the old Palace is John Taylor, the Water
poet, in the amusing narrative of his Pennylesse Pilgrimage to Scotland in 1618. The
following is his description :-‘‘ I was at his Majestie’s Palace, a stately and princely
seate, wherein I saw a sumptuous Chappell, most richly adorned with all appurtenances
belonging to so sacred 8 pJace, or so royal1 an owner. In the inner court I saw
the King’s Armes cunningly carved in stone, and fixed over a doore aloft on the wall, the
Red Lyon being the Crest, over which was written this inscription in Latin :-No6is h c
invicta miserunt 106 Proavi. I inquired what the English of it was? it was told me as
followeth, which I thought worthy to be recorded-106 Fore-fatAers have left this to us
unconquered;”-an interpretation which leads the Water poet into a series of very loyal
EL4ST. SPENT. YE. DAY. PAST . IF . THOW. HAVE. WELL . DON. THANK. GOD . LF . OTHEB .
Fide Archadogia Scotica, vol. iv. ; from whence the inscription ia correctly given. ’ Ibid, p. 14, ... ANTIQUITIES. 407 from the deceased King of Scots’ Palace all or most of his princely library, ...

Book 10  p. 446
(Score 0.8)

YAMES V. TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARY. 67
the tower of the preceptoy, and not that of the present parish church, as the talented
editor of Keith’s History suggests.’ No vestige, indeed, of St Anthony’s steeple has
existed for centuries, and it is probable that it was totally destroyed at this period. The
tower of St Mary’s, which was takendown in 1836, was evidently an erection of a much
later date, and too small to have admitted of a battery being mounted upon it.
On the 22d of April, Monluc, bishop of Valence, arrived as a commissioner from the
Court of France, and attempted to mediate between the Regent aiid the Lords of the
Congregation. He entered into communication with the reformers and their allies, and
spent two days in the English camp ; he thereafter passed to the Queen lkgent in Edinburgh
Castle, but. all attempts at reconciliation proved ineffectual, as the asRailants would
accept of no other terms than the demolition of the fortifications of Leith, and the dismissal
of all the French troops from Scotland.
Meanwhile, the Queen Regent lay in the Castle of Edinburgh, sufferilig alike from
failing health and anxiety of mind. Her life was now drawing to a close, and she repeatedly
sought to bring about a reconciliation between the contending parties, that she might, if
possible, resign the sceptre to her daughter free from the terrible rivalry and contentions
which had embittered the whole period of her Regency ; but all attempts at compromise
proved in vain, and her French advisers prevented her closing with the sole proposal on
which the leaders of the Congregation at length agreed to acknowledge her authoritynamely,
that all foreign troops should immediately quit the realm.
When the Queen Regent found her end approaching, she requested an interview with
the Lords of the Congregation. The Duke of Chatelherault, the Earls of Argyle, Marischal,
and Glencairn, with the Lord James, immediately repaired to the Castle, where they
were received by the dying Queen with such humility and unfeigned kindness as deeply
moved them. She extended her hand to each of them, beseeching their forgiveness with
tears, whereinsoever she had offended them. She expressed deep grief that matters should
ever have come to such extremities, ascribing it to the influence of foreign counsels, which
had compelled her to act contrary to her own inclinations.
At the request of the
barons, she received a visit from John Willock, with whom she conversed for a considerable
time. He besought her to seek mercy alone through the death of Christ, urging her
at the same time to acknowledge the mass as a relic of idolatry. She assured him that
she looked for salvation in no other way than through the death of her Saviour; and
without replying to his further exhortation, she bade him farewell.’
The Queen Regent died on the following day, the 10th of June 1560. The preachers
refused to permit her to be buried according to the rites of the Catholic Church. Her body
was accordingly placed in a lead coffin, and kept in the Castle till the 9th of October,
when it was transported to France, and buried in the Benedictine monastery at Rheims, of
which her own sister was then Abbess.
Both parties were now equally iuclined to a peace ; and accordingly, within a very short
time after the death of the Regent, Cecil, the able minister of Queen Elizabeth, repaired to
Edinburgh, accompanied by Sir Nicholas Wotton. Here they were met by the Bishops of
The scene was so affecting that all present were moved to tears.
Keith, 1844, Spottiswood Soc., voL i p. 271. Wodrow MieL voL i. p. 84. * Calderwood, voL i. p. 589. Keith, voL i. p. 280. ... V. TO ABDICATION OF QUEEN MARY. 67 the tower of the preceptoy, and not that of the present parish church, as ...

Book 10  p. 73
(Score 0.8)

YAMES YI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES 11. 89
very willing to make the most of such an occasion as this, and remained for a time inexorable.
The magistrates were required to surrender themselves prisoners at Perth, and one
of them having failed to appear, the town was denounced, the inhabitants declared rebels,
and the city revenues sequestrated to the King’s use.
The magistrates at length went in a body to the Palace of Holyrood House, and, kneeling
before him, made offer of such concessions as the indignant monarch was pleased to
accept. One of the conditions bound them to deliver up, for the King’s sole me, the
houses in their kirkyard, occupied by the town ministers, which was accordingly done, and
on the site of them the Parliament House, which still stands (though recently entirely
remodelled externally), was afterwards built. They also agreed to pay to him the sum of
twenty thousand merks, and 80 at length all difficulties were happily adjusted between
them, and the city restored to its ancient privileges.
After the execution of the famous Earl of Gowry and his brother at Perth, their dead
bodies were brought to Edinburgh and exposed at the Market Cross, hung in chains. From
that time, James enjoyed some years of tranquillity, living at Holyrood and elsewhere in
such homely state as his revenues would permit; and when the extravagance of his
Queen,-who was a devoted patron of the royal goldsmith, George Heriot,-or his
own narrow means, rendered his housekeeping somewhat stinted, he was accustomed
to pay a condescending visit to some of the wealtllier citizens in the High Street of
Edinburgh.
An interesting old building, called Lockhart’s Court, Niddry’a Wpd, which was
demolished in constructing the southern approach to the town, was especially famous as
the scene of such civic entertainment of royalty. We learn, from Moyses’s 34emoirs, of
James’s residence there in 1591, along with his Queen, shortly after their arrival from
Denmark, and their hospitable reception by Nicol Edward, a wealthy citizen, who was
then Provost of Edinburgh.’
His visits, also, to George Heriot were of frequent occurrence, and, as tradition reports,
he made no objection to occasionally discussing a bottle of wine in the goldsmith’s little
booth, at the west end of St Giles’s Church, which was only about seven feet square.*
The death of Queen Elizabeth, in 1603, produced a lively excitement in the minds both
of King and people. The anticipation of this event for years had gradually prepared, and
in some degree reconciled, the latter to the idea of their King going to occupy the throne of ‘‘ their auld enemies of England,” but its injurious influence on the capital could not be
mistaken. On the 31st of March the news was proclaimed at the City Cross by the secretary
Elphinstone, and Sir David Lindsay, younger, the Lyon King.
King James, before his departure, attended public service in St Giles’s Church, where he
had often before claimed the right of challenging the dicta of the preachers from the royal
gallery. An immense crowd assembled on the occasion, and listened with deep interest to
a discourse expressly addressed to his Majesty upon the important change. The King took
it in good part, and, on the preacher concluding, he delivered a farewell address to the
people. Many were greatly affecied at the prospect of their King’s departure, which was
generally regarded as anything rather than a national benefit. The farewell was couched
in the warmest language of friendship. He promised them that he would defend their
’
Mopes’s Memoirs, p. 182. * Chambers’s Traditions, VOL ii. p. 210.
M ... YI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES 11. 89 very willing to make the most of such an occasion as this, and remained ...

Book 10  p. 97
(Score 0.79)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 475
degree owing to the liberal views, the professional talents, activity, and address of Mr.
Constable-coqvinced, moreover, that the opinion of the public of this place is, in this respect,
in unison with our own, we feel assured, that in offering to his memory this mournful tribute
of our private regard and respect, we at the same time give utterance to feelings strongly felt
by the community at large. . . . The author of Waverley has himself borne honourable testimony,
in the introduction to one of his novels, to Mr. Constable’s merits ; and we are satisfied,
that what he thus proclaimed in the prolegomena of a work of fiction, he would repeat, if the
opportunity shall occur, with perfect sincerity, and perhaps greater force, in a work of truth.
How it happened, that with all the splendid success, so beneficial and honourable to our literature,
which attended Mr. Constable’s undertakings, his publishing career should have closed so
disastrorisly, we ape not very able, nor much disposed at present, to inquire. We firmly
believe that he proceeded onwards to that close, void of any apprehension of such an issue,
and wholly unconscious of its near approach. He had just completed the plan of the Miscellany
which bears his name, and waa busied seemingly, with well-founded hopes, in sanguine calculations
of the returns which it would bring to his house. Its publication did not take place till
after the failure of that establishment ; and we are happy to think that its subsequent succesa
furnished some solace for his misfortunes, as well as some alleviation of his bodily sufferings ;
his final undertaking thus proving to be his last and only means of support. We are not writing
a full or elaborate character, and do not therefore feel ourselves called upon to point out all the
features of Mr. Constable’s mind and conduct. We have only detailed a few particulars, calculated
to justify the sentiments of grateful respect which we entertain for his memory, aij by far
the most eminent publisher that Scotland ever produced. In that line we certainly do not
expect soon again to see a man joining such professional abilities to such liberal and extensive
views; so capable of appreciating literary merit, and so anxious to find for it employment
and reward ; so largely endowed with the discernment, tact, and manners necessary to maintain
a useful, honourable, and harmonious intercourse with literary men.”-CaZedonian. Ne~cury,
July 23, 1827.
In 1804 Mr. Constable assumed Mr. Hunter of Blackness as a partner,
and from that time the business was carried on under the title of Archibald
Constable and Co. In 1808 he established a London branch, which, however, was
soon discontinued. In 181 1 Mr. Hunter retired from the partnership, and Mr.
Cathcart of Drum, W.S., and Mr. Robert Cadell were assumed. The former of
these dying, the year after Mr. Cadell was left sole partner.
Mr. Constable was twice married, first, in 1795, to Mary, daughter of Mr.
David Willison, a highly respected printer, whose office was situated in Craig’s
Close, and where the Edinburgh Review was first printed (she died in lS14), and
secondly, in 1818, to Charlotte, daughter of John Neale, Esq., who survived him.
His family consisted of three sons and three daughters. Of the former, Thomas,
the second son, still survives, and is not only the representative but the
biographer of his illustrious father.’ The eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was married
in 1817 to his partner, Mr. Robert Cadell. On leaving his ancient domicile in
the High Street, Mr. Constable resided for several years at Craigcrook
(afterwards the residence of Lord Jeffrey), and latterly in Park Place, where
he died.
“Archibald Constable and his Literary Correspondents : a Memorial by his Son, Thomas
Constable,” 3 vols., 1873. ... SKETCHES. 475 degree owing to the liberal views, the professional talents, activity, and address of ...

Book 9  p. 634
(Score 0.79)

72 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
promise of replacing, at some indefinite period, ‘‘ als mony als gud jeistis ” as had been
taken away.l
Materials and money continued equally difficult to be obtained; the master of the
work had again to have recourse for stones to the old building, although the magistrates
were anxious, ifpossible, to preserve it. On the 5th of March 1562, an order appears for
taking the stones of the chapel in the Nether Kirk-yard. This supplies the date of the
utter demolition of Holyrood Chapel, as it was styled, which had most probably been
spoiled and broken down during the tumults of 1559, It stood between the present
Parliament House and the Cowgate; and there, on the 12th of August 1528, Walter
Chepman founded a chaplainry at the altar of Jesus Christ crucified, and endowed it with
his tenement in the Cowgate.’
In the month of April, the Council are threatened with the entire removal of the Courts
to St Andrews, for want of a place of meeting in Edinburgh. This is followed ‘by forced
taxation, borrowing money on the town mills, threats from the builder to give up the
work, (‘ because he had oft and diverse tymes requyrit money, -and could get nane,” and
the like, for some years following, until the magistrates contrived, at length, by some
means or other, to complete the new building to the satisfaction of all parties.
this interval, the Town Council held their own meetings in the Holy-Blood Aisle in St
Giles’s Church, until apartments were provided for them, in the New Tolbooth, which
served alike for the meetings of the Parliament, the Court of Session, and the Magistrates
and Council of the burgh.
The New Tolbooth, thus erected with so much difficulty, was not the famous Heart
of Midlothian, but a more modern building attached to the south-west corner of
St Giles’s Church, part of the site of which is now occupied by the lobby of the Signet
Library.
In February 1561, the Lord James, newly created Earl of Mar, was publicly married
to Lady Agnes Keith, daughter of the Earl Marischal, in St Giles’s Church. They
received an admonition “to behave themselves moderately in all things; ” but this did not
prevent the event being celebrated with such display as gave great offence to the preachers.
A magnificent banquet was given on the occasion, with pageants and masquerades, which
the Queen honoured with her presence. Randolph, the ambassadar of Queen Elizabeth,
was also a guest, and thus writes of it to Cecil :--“At this notable marriage, upon Shrove
Tuesday, at night, sitting among the Lords at supper, in sight of the Queen, she drank
unto the Queen’s Majesty, and sent me the cup of gold, which weigheth eighteen or twenty
ounces.” The preachers denounced, with veh‘emence, the revels and costly banquets on
this occasion, inveighing with peculiar energy against the masking, a practice, as it would
seem, till then unknown in Scotland.’
The reformation of religion continued to be pursued with the utmost zeal. The Queen
still retained the service of the mass in her own private chapel, to the great offence of the
preachers ; but they had succeeded in entirely banishing it from the churches. The arms
and burgh sed of Edinburgh, previous to this period, contained a representation of the
patron saint, St Giles, with his hind; but by an act of the Town Council, dated 24th
During,
1 Council Register, 10th Feb. 1561, &c.
Council Register, Maitland, p. 183.
Maitland, p. 21, 22. Chambers’s Minor Antiquitits, p. 141-0.
Knox’s Hi&, p. 276. Tytler, vol. vi. p. 301. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. promise of replacing, at some indefinite period, ‘‘ als mony als gud jeistis ” as ...

Book 10  p. 78
(Score 0.79)

Broughton Street.] THE CALEDONIAN THEATRE. 179
was the band of the 78th, where hung the shields
of Picton and Achmuty, and a brilliant star, with
the mottoes Assnye and Mnida. ?Under this
orchestra was a beautiful transparency, representing
an old Scotsman with his bonnet, giving a
hearty welcome to two soldiers of the 42nd and
78th regiments, while a bonny lassie is peeping out
from a cottage door; the background formed a
landscape, with Edinburgh Castle in the distance.?
At eleven o?clock came famous old Neil Gow,
with his band of violins, and the ball-which was
long remembered in Edinburgh-began.
After some time Corri?s Rooms were called the
Pantheon, and in December, 1823, the house was
again opened under the new appellation of the
Caledonian Theatre (which it held for years afterwards),
by Mr. Henry Johnstone, an old Edinburgh
favourite and luckless native of the city.
The papers of the time announce that the dancing
and tumbling of the Pantheon ?are superseded;
and, excepting that melodramas are presented in
place of regular tragedies and comedies, the Caledonian
Theatre in no respect difters in the nature
and style of its entertainments from the regular
theatre.? One of the first pieces brought out was
The. Orphan of Geneva.
?The house is dingy and even dirty,? says the
WeekQIoumaZ for that year, ?< and very defectively
lighted. This is not at all in harmony with Mr.
Johnstone?s usual enterprise, and calls for amendment.
The name of CaZedonian is perhaps conceived
to be a kind of apology for the clumsy
tartan hangings over some of the boxes; but we
can by no means comprehend why the house was
not re-painted. The visitor cannot fail to be immediately
struck with the contrast of its dingy hue, with
the freshness and beauty of the Theatre Royal.?
Mr. Johnstone?s losses compelled him, after a
time, to relinquish management. He left Edinburgh,
and did not return to it till 1830, when
he played four nights .at the same theatre, then
leased by Mr. Bass. Poor Johnstone, an actor
much admired in London, but every wayunfortunate,
eventually went to America.
The theatre was afterwards called the Adelphi,
and was burned in 1853, during the management
of Mr. R. H. Wyndham. On its site was rebuilt
the Queen?s Theatre and Opera House, under the
same enterprising manager, long one of the greatest
theatrical favourites in Edinburgh ; but this also
was destroyed by fire in 1865, when several lives
were lost by the falling of a wall. By a singular
fatality it was a third time completely gutted by
fire ten years afterwards, but was reconstructed in
the latter part of 1875, and reopened in January,
1876, prior to which Mr. and Mrs. Wyndham had
taken their farewell of the stage and of Edinburgh.
It is a h3ndsome building, with a portico, and is
adorned with medallions of Shakspere, Scott,
Molihre, and Goethe. Although erected within the
walls of the theatre burned on the 6th of February,
1875, it is almost entirely a new building internally,
different from all its predecessors, greatly improved,
and seated for 2,300 persons. The works have
been designed and executed by C. J. Phipps, F.S.A.,
architect of the Gaiety Theatre, London.
Immediately adjoining this theatre-the gable
wall being a mutual one-is St. Mary?s Roman
Catholic chapel, now the pro-cathedral of the
Archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, whose
residence is in the narrow lane to the northward.
It was built in 1813, from designs by James
Gillespie Graham, architect, at the expense of
iE;8,ooo. In the original elevations more omament
was introduced than it was found there were
funds to execute, as these were chiefly raised by
subscription among the Catholics of Edinburgh,
then a small, and still a poor, congregation. The
dimensions of this edifice within the walls are
IIO feet by 57. The eastern front, in which is
the entrance, is ornamented by two central pinnacles
70 feet high, and the adoption of the Gothic
style in this small chapel jirst led to the adoption
of a similar style in various other re!igious edifices
since erected in the city. It possesses a very good
organ, and above the altar is a fine painting of the
Saviour dead. It was presented to the church by
Miss Chalmers, daughter of Sir G. Chalmers.
Some prelates of the Catholic Church lie buried
before the high altar, among them Bishops
Alexander Cameron and Andrew Carruthers. The
interment of the former excited much interest in
Edinburgh in 1Sz8, the funeral obsequies being in
a style never seen in Scotland since the Reformation,
and also from the general esteem in which
the bishop was held by all. He was born in
1747, and went to the Scottish College at Rome
in 1760, and bore away all the prizes Returning
to Scotland in 1772, he was Missionary Apostolic
in Strathearn till 1780, when he was consecrated
at Madeira, and, succeeding Bishop Hay, had re
sided permanently in Edinburgh since 1806. ... Street.] THE CALEDONIAN THEATRE. 179 was the band of the 78th, where hung the shields of Picton and ...

Book 3  p. 179
(Score 0.78)

198 OLD AND NEW EDINBURGH. [Northumberland Street.
A noted antiquary, he was Correspondant du
Comitk Imp2riaZ des Travaux Historipes, et aes
SaWs Savants. de France, &c. He was well
known in Edinburgh for his somewhat coarse wit,
and as a collector of rare books, whose library in
Great King Street was reported to be the most
valuable private one in the city, where he was
called-but more especially among legal men-
?Alphabet Turnbull,? from the number of his
initials. He removed to London about 1853, and
became seriously embroiled with the authorities
concerning certain historical documents in the
State Paper Office, when he had his chambers
in 3 Stone Buildings, Lincoln?s Inn Fields.
He died at London on the 22nd of April, 1863,
in his fifty-second year ; and a story went abroad
that a box of MS. papers was mysteriously buried
with him.
CHAPTER XXVII.
NORTHERN NEW TOWN (cmclttded).
Admiral Fairfax-Bishop Terrot-Brigadier Hope-Sir T. M. Brisbane--Lord Meadowbank-Ewbank the R.S.A-Death of Professor Wilson-
Moray Place and its Distrk-Lord President Hope-The Last Abode of Jeffrey-Baron Hume and Lord Monuieff-Forres Street-
Thomas Chalmers. D.D.-St. Colme Street-CaDtain Basil Hall-Ainslie Place-Dugald Stewart-Dean Ramsay-Great Stoart Street-
Professor Aytoun-Miss Graham of Duntroon-Lord Jervkwoode
IN the narrow and somewhat sombre thoroughfare
named Northumberlanc! Street have dwelt some
people who were of note in their time.
In 1810 Lady Emily Dundas, and Admiral Sir
William George Fairfax, resided in Nos. 46 and
53 respectively. The admiral had distinguished
himself at the battle of Camperdown as flag-captain
of the Vmemble, under Admiral Duncan; and in
consideration of his acknowledged bravery and
merit on that occasion-being sent home with the
admiral?s despatches-he was made knight-banneret,
with an augmentation to his coataf-arms in
chief, a representation of 1I.M.S. Venerable en.
gaging the Dutch admiral?s ship Yryheid; and to
do justice to the memory of ?? departed worth,? at
his death his son was made a baronet of Great
Britain in 1836. He had a daughter named Mary,
who became the wife of Samuel Greig, captain and
commissioner in the imperial Russian navy.
No. 19 in the same street was for some years the
residence of the Right Rev. Charles Hughes
Terrot, D.D., elected in 1857 Primus of the Scottish
Episcopal Church, and whose quaint little
figure, with shovel-hat and knee-breeches, was long
familiar in the streets of Edinburgh. He wss born
at Cuddalore in the East Indies in 1790. For
some reasons, though he had not distinguished
himself in the Cambridge Tripos list of University
honours, his own College (Trinity College) paid
him the highest compliment in their power, by
electing him a Fellow on the first occasion aftex
he had taken his degree of B.A. in mathematical
honours, and subsequently proceeded to M.A.
and D.D. He did not remain long at college,
as he soon married and went to Scotland, where
he continued all his life attached to the Scottish
Episcopal Church, as successively incumbent of
Haddington, of St. Peter?s, and finally St. Paul?s,
York Place, Edinburgh. In 1841 he was made
bishop of Edinburgh, on the death of Bishop
Walker. He was author of several works on
theology, During the latter years of his life,
from extreme age and infirmity, he had been
entirely laid aside from his pastoral and episcopal
labours ; but during the period of his health and
vigour few men were more esteemed in his pastoral
relations as their minister, or by his brethren of
the Episcopal Church for his acuteness and clever
judgment in their discussions in church affairs.
The leading features of Dr. Terrot?s intellectual
character were accuracy and precision rather than
very extensive learning or great research. It
was very striking sometimes after a subject had
been discussed in a desultory and commonplace
manner, to hear him coming down ?upon the ,
question with a clear and cutting remark which
put the whole matter in a new and distinct point
of view.
He was long a Fellow and Vice-President of the
Royal Society of Edinburgh, to which he communicated
some very able and acute papers, especially
on logical and mathematical subjects. So also in
his moral and social relations, he was remarkable for
his manly, fair, and honourable bearing. He had
what might essentially be called a pure and honest
mind. He wasdevotedly attached to his own Church,
and few knew better how to argue in favour of its
polity and forms of service, never varying much in
externals ; but few men were more ready to concede
to others the liberality of judgment which he
. ... OLD AND NEW EDINBURGH. [Northumberland Street. A noted antiquary, he was Correspondant du Comitk Imp2riaZ des ...

Book 4  p. 198
(Score 0.78)

JAMES VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES 11. 91
In the following year, the Common Council purchased the elevated ground lying to the
south of the city, denominated the High Riggs, on part of which Heriot’s Hospital was
afterwards built, and the latest extension of the city wall then took place for the purpose
of enclosing it. A portion of this wall still forms the western boundary of the Hospital
grounds, terminating at the head of the Vennel, in the only remaining tower of the ancient
city wall. The close of the succeeding year was signalised by the visit of Ben Jonson, on
his way to Hawthornden, the seat of the poet Drummond, where the memory of his
residence is still preserved.
The accession of Charles I. was marked by demands for heavy contributions, for the
purpose of fitting out ships, and erecting forts for securing the coasts of the kingdom.
The Common Council of Edinburgh entered so zealously into this measure, that the King
addressed to them a special letter of thanks ; and as a further proof of his gratitude, he
presented the Provost with a gown, to be worn according to King James’s appointment,
and a sword to be borne before him on all public occasions.
The citizens were kept for several years in anticipation of another royal visit, which
was at length accomplished in 1633. The same loyalty was displayed, as on similar occasions,
for receiving the King with suitable splendour. The celebrated poet, Drummond
of Hawthornden, was appointed to address him on this occasion, which he did in a
speech little less extravagant than that with which the town-clerk had hailed his royal
father’s arrival.
The King was received at
the West Port by the nymph Edina, and again at the Overbow by the lady Caledonia, each
of whom welcomed him in copious verse, attributed to Drummond’s pen. The members
of the College added their quota, and Mercury, Apollo, Endymion, the Moon, and a whole
host of celestial visitants made trial of the royal patience in lengthy @ymes !
Fergus I. received the King at the Tolbooth, and “in a grave speech gave many
paternal and wholesome advices to his royal successor ; ” and Mount Parnassus was
erected at the Trone, “with a great variety of vegetables, rocks, and other decorations
peculiar to mountains,’’ and crowded with all its ancient inhabitants. The whole fantastic
exhibition cost the city upwards of 3241,000 Scottish money!’ The most interesting
feature on the occasion was a series of the chief works of Jamesone, the famous Scottish
painter, with which the Nether Bow Port was adorned. This eminent artist continued to
reside in Edinburgh till his death, in 1644. He was buried in the Greyfriars’ Churchyard,
but without a monument, and tradition has failed to preserve any record of the
spot.
This hearty reception by the citizens of Edinburgh was followed by his coronation, on
the 18th of June, in the Abbey Church of Holyrood, with the utmost splendour and pomp ;
but the King was not long gone ere the discontents of the people were manifested by murmuring
and complaints. Under the guidance of Laud, Charles had resolved to carry out
the favourite project of his father, for the complete establishment of Episcopacy in Scotland
; but he lacked the cautious prudence of James, no less than the wise councillors of
Elizabeth. He erected Edinburgh into a separate diocese, taking for that purpose a portion
of the ancient Metropolitan See of St Andrews, and appointed the Collegiate Church
The orator’s poetical skill was nest called into requisition.
Maitland, p. 63-69. ... VI. TO RESTORATION OF CHARLES 11. 91 In the following year, the Common Council purchased the elevated ground ...

Book 10  p. 99
(Score 0.78)

CONTENTS.
PAGE
INTROEUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J
CHAPTER I.
P R E H I S T O R I C EDINBURGH.
The Site before the Houses-Traces of Early Inhabitants-The Caledonian Tribes-Agricola's Invasion-Subjection of the Scottish Lowlands
-The Rorrao Way-Edinburgh never occupied permanently-Various Roman Remains : Urns, Coins, Busts ; Swords, Spears, ahd
other Weapons-Ancient Coffins-The Camus, or Cath-st,neOrigin of the name " Edinburgh"-Dinas-Eiddyn-The Battle of Catraeth 9
CHAPTER 11.
THE CASTLE OF EDINBURGH.
Of its Origin and remoter History-The Legends concerning it-Ebranke-St. Monena-Def& of the Sawons by King Bridei-King
Edwin-King Grime-The Story of Grime and Bertha of Badlieu-The Starting paint of authentic Edinburgh History-Sr Margaret
-Het Piety and amiable Disposition-Her Chapel-Her Death-Restoration of her Oratory-Her Burial-Donald Bane-King
David 1.-The Royal Gardens, afterwards the Nonh Loch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I4
CHAPTER 111.
CASTLE OF EDINBURGH (continued).
The Legend of the White Hart-Holyrocd Abbey founded--The Monks of the Castrum Puellarum-David I.% numerous Endowments-His
Death-Fergus. Lord of Galloway, dies there-William the Lion-Castle Garrisoned by the English for Twelve Yean-The Castle a
Royal Residence-The War of the Scottish Succession-The ( h t l e in the hands of Edward 1.-Frank's Escalade-The Lbrtres
Dismantled-Again in the hands of the English-Bullock's Stratagem for its Re-caprurr-David's Tower . . . . . . 21
CHAPTER IV.
CASTLE OF EDINBURGH (confinucd).
Progress of the City-Ambassidor of Charles VI.-Edinburgh burned-Henry IV, baffled-Albmy's Prophecy-Laws lrgvdiog the Building
- of Houses-Sumptuary Laws, 1457-Murder of James I.-Coronationof JarncsI1.-Court Intrigues-Lard Chancellor C r i c h t o n - ~ g ~ c e
of the Earl of Douglas-Faction WaR--l'he Castle Resieged--"The Black Dinner"-Edmburgh Walled-Its Strength -Bale-fires . 26
CHAPTER V.
EDINBURGH CASTLE (continued).
James 111. and his haughty Nobilib-Plots of the Duke of Albany and Earl of Mar-Mysterious Death of Mar-Capture and Escape of the
Duke of Altuny-Captivity of James 111.-Richard of Gloucester at Edinburgh-The "Golden Charter" of the City-"The Blue
Blanket"-Accession of James 1V.-Tournamen%" The Seven Sisters of Bothwick "-The " Fldden Wall"-The Reign of Jarnes V.
-" Cleahse the Causeway !"-Edinburgh under the Factions of Nobles-Hertford Attacks the CastltDeath of Mary of Guise-
Queen Mary's Apartments in the CaStle-BLth of James VI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
CHAPTER VI.
EDINBURGH CASTLE (continued).
The Siege of r573-The City Bombarded from the Castle-Elizabeth's Spy-D~ry's Dispositions for the Siege-Execution of Kirkddy-
Repar of the Ruins-Execution of Mortan-Visit of Charles 1.-Procession to Holymod-Comnation of Charles 1.-The Struggle
against Epiico-Siege of 1640-The Spectre Drummn-Besieged by Cmmwell-Under the Protector-The Restantion-The
Argyles-The Accession of James VI1.-Sentence of the Earl of Argyle-His. clever Escape-Imprisoned lour yms later-The Last
Sleep of ArgylcHis Death-Tolture of Covenaoters-Proclamation of W d l i and Maq-The Siege of 16@-Intewiew between
Gordon and Dundee-The Cas le invested-Rdiant Defeuce-Capitulation of the Duke of Cordon-The Spectre of Claverhouse . 47 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J CHAPTER I. P R E H I S T O R ...

Book 2  p. 385
(Score 0.78)

THE CASTLE. 127
of Scotland is kept. The apartment is a massive bombproof vault, and contains, along
with these national treasures, the old, iron-bound oak chest in which they were found in
the year 1817. The remarkably elegant crown is referred, with every probability, to the
era of Bruce, although it was not adorned with the graceful concentric arches of gold till
the r e i p of James V. It was further completed by the substitution of the present cap of
crimson velvet by James VIL for the former purple one, which had suffered during its
concealment in the civil wars. Next in interest to the crown is the beautiful sword of
state, presented by Pope Julius 11. to James IV. The scabbard is richly wrought with
filigree work of silver, representing oak boughs adorned with leaves and acorns,-an oak
tree being the heraldic device of that warlike Pontiff. In addition to the finely proportioned
sceptre, surmounted with statues of the Virgin, St Andrew, and St James, which
was made for James V., these interesting national relics are accompanied by the royal jewels,
bequeathed by Cardinal York, the last of the Stuarts, to George IV., including the George
and collar of the Order of the Garter, presented by Queen Elizabeth to James VI.-the badge
of .the Thistle of the same Monarch, containing a portrait of Anne of Denmark,-and the
coronation ring of Charles I.
The north side of this quadrangle now consists of a plain and uninteresting ra.nge of
barracks, erected about the middle of last century, previous to which time the site was
occupied by a church of large dimensions and great antiquity. It is described by Maitland
as “ a very long and large ancient church, which,” says he, “ from its spacious dimensions,
I imagine that it was not only built for the use of the small garrison, but for the service of
the neighbouring inhabitants, before St Giles’s Church was erected for their accommodation.”
Unfortunately, that laborious and painstaking historian, having little taste for
ecclesiastical remains, has furnished no account of the style of architecture by which to
judge of its probable date, though his idea of its having existed before the earliest church
of St Giles, shows his conviction of its very great antiquity, and would carry its foundation
back to a much earlier period than can be assigned to it. This most probabIy was a church
that appears to have been built shortly after the death of the pious Queen of Malcolm Canmore,
and dedicated to her.
‘‘ the Church of the Castle of Edinburgh,” a and is again confirmed to the Abbey of the
Holy Rood in that of Alexander III., as well as in successive Papal bulls.’ Robert II.
granted to St Margaret’s Chapel, within the Castle of Edinburgh, an yearly rent of eight
pounds sterling, out of the customs of Edinburgh; and this donation is confirmed by
Robert IIL’
In the bird’seye
view in Cordon’s map, the south elevation is shown ; it also forms a prominent object
in Sandby’s view of the Castle from the east, already referred to, and would seem to have
been a comparatively plain edifice, with crow-step gables and small windows, and was, in
d1 probability, an erection in the Norman style that prevailed at the period. From the
latter view, it would also appear to have been roofed with stone flags, and ornamented along
the ridge with carved pinnacles, auch as may still be seen on St MaFy’s Church at Leith.
This church seems to have been applied to secular purposes soon%fter the Reformation
It is mentioned by David I. in his charter of Holyrood,
Some idea of the form of the church may be gathered from old views.
1 Maitland, p. 145.
a Liber Cartarurn, pp. 64, 169, 186.
Liber Cartarurn, pp. 3-7.
* Caledonia, vol. ii. p. 693. ... CASTLE. 127 of Scotland is kept. The apartment is a massive bombproof vault, and contains, along with these ...

Book 10  p. 138
(Score 0.78)

KING’S STABLES, CASTLE BARNS, AND CASTLE HILL. 141
brother, united with it the title of Earl of Stair; a combination of titles in one person,
that afforded the wits of last century a favourite source of jest in the supposed recontres of
the two noble Earls.
The mansion appears to have passed into this nobleman’s possession very shortly after
its erection, as among the titles there is a declaration by William Earl of Dumfries, of
the date 20th March 1747, “that the back laigh door ol passage on the west side of
the house, which enters to the garden and property belonging to Mr Charles Hamilton
Gordon, advocate, is ane entry of mere tolerance given to me at the pleasure of the
owner,” &c.
The Earl was succeeded in it by his widow, who, exactly within year and day of his
death, married the Honourable Alexander Gordon, son of the second Earl of Aberdeen, On
his appointment as a Lord of Sesaion in 1784, he assumed the title of Lord Rockville,
from his estate in East Lothian. He was the last titled occupant that inhabited this
once patrician dwelling of the Old Town ; and the narrow alley that gives access to the court
behind, accordingly retaina the name of Rockville Close. Within this close, towards the
west, there is a plain substantial land now exposed to view by the Castle Road, originally
possessed by Elizabeth, Countess Dowager of Hyndford, and sold by her in the year 1740,
to Henry, the last Lord Holyroodhouse, who died at his house in the Canongate in 1755.l
Various ancient closes, and very picturesque front lands that formed the continuation of
the southern side of the Castle Hill, have been swept away to give place to the new
western approach and the Assembly Hall. One of these, ROSS’SC ourt, contained ‘‘ The
great Marquis of hgyle’s House in the Castlehill,” described by Creech, in his “ Fugitive
Pieces,” as inhabited, at that degenerate period, by a hosier, at a rental of S12 per annum.
Another of them, ‘Kennedy’s Close, though in its latter days a mean and dirty alley,
possessed some interesting remains of earlier times. It probably derived its name from a
recent occupant, a son of Sir Andrew Kennedy of Clowburn, Baronet ; but both Gom the
antique character, and the remains of faded grandeur in some of its buildings, it had doubtless
afforded residences for some of the old nobles of the Court of Holyrood. The front land
was said to have been the town mansion of the Earls of Cassillis, whose family name is
Kennedy. It was adorned, at the entrance to the close, with a handsome stone architrave,
supported on two elegant spiral fluted pillars, and the rest of the building presented a
picturesque wooden front to the street. Within the close there was another curious old
wooden fronted land, which tradition reported a0 having been at one period a nonjurant
Episcopal chapel. An inspection of this building during its demolition, served to show
that, although the main fabric was substantial and elegant stone work, the wooden front
was an integral part of the original design. It was found that the main beams of the ~ O U S ~ ,
of fine old oak, were continued forward through the stone wall, so as to support the wood
work beyond, and this was further confirmed by the existence of a large fireplace on the
outside of the stone wall; an arrangement which may still be seen in a similarly constructed
land at the head of Lady Stair’s Close, and probably in others. Within this house there
was one of the beautifully sculptured gothic niches, already alluded to, of which we furnish
a view, in the state in which it existed when the house was taken down. This we presume
*
Douglk’s Peerage. ... STABLES, CASTLE BARNS, AND CASTLE HILL. 141 brother, united with it the title of Earl of Stair; a ...

Book 10  p. 152
(Score 0.78)

56 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH.
interfering with a high hand, even to the ‘t ordouring of everie mannis house,” and regulating
with a most rigid economy the number of dishes at each man’s table, according to
his degree. But the most interesting is, that against printing without licence, furnishing
an insight into the variety and character of the writings then issuing from the press, and
already strongly influencing the public mind. ‘‘ l%at na prenter presume to prent ony
buikes, ballattes, sanges, blasphemationes, rime, or tragedies, outher in Latine or English
toung,” without due examination and licence granted, under pain of confiscation of goods,
and banishment of the realm for ever.’ Sir David Lindsay had already published his
Tragedie of tAe Cardinal, and it seems to have been about this time that he put forth
The Historie and Testament of Spuyer Meldrum, one of his most pleasing poems, though
in parts exhibiting a licence, as to incident and language, common to the writers of that
age. This poem is the versification of a romantic incident which occurred under his own
observation during the unsettled period, in the earlier years of the minority of James V.
(August 1517.)’ The rank of Sir D a d Lindsay, and the influence he had enjoyed
during the previous reign, had continued to preserve him from all interference ; nor was
’ it till the accession of Elizabeth to the throne of England, and the steps in favour of the
Protestant party that followed thereon, that the Catholic clergy at length denounced his
writings as the fruitful source of movement in the popular mind.
The object of the Queen Dowager, in her recent visit to France, had been mainly to
secure the interest of that Court in procuring for herself the office of Regent. The Earl
of Arran, who still held that office, seems to have been altogether deficient in the requisite
talents for his responsible position ; swqyed alternately by whichever adviser chanced to
hold his confidence, his government was at once feeble and uncertain.
No sooner had the Queen Dowager secured the approbation and concurrence of the
French King, than her emissaries departed for the Scottish capital, empowered to break
the affair to the Regent, with such advantageous offer as should induce him to yield up
the office without difficulty. Threats were held out of a rigid reckoning being required as
to the dilapidation of the revenue and crown-lands, which had taken place during his
government.
Chatelherault, with ample provision for his eldest aon at the French Court, while like
liberal promises secured to the Queen’s party many of the nobility.
The kchbishop of St Andrews, who had latterly influenced all the motions of the
Regent, chanced at this time to be dangerously ill, so that Arran was left without counsel
or aid, and yielded at length a reluctant consent to the exchange.
On the return of Mary of Guise from France, she accompanied Arran in a progress
through the northern parts of the kingdom, in which she exhibited much of that prudence
and ability which she undoubtedly possessed, and which, in more fortunate times, might
have largely promoted the best interests of the country: while such was the popularity
she acquired, that the Regent became highly jealous of her influence, and when reminded
of his promise, indignantly refused to yield up the government into her hands.
The Queen Dowager, however, already possessed the real power ; and while the Regent,
with his few adherents, continued to reside at Edinburgh, and maintain there the forms of
government, she was holding a brilliant court at Stirling, and securing to her party the
.
On the other hand, he was offered the splendid bribe of the Dukedom of .
l Scots Acta, vol. i. p. 286. * Pitscottie, vol. ii. p, 305. ... MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. interfering with a high hand, even to the ‘t ordouring of everie mannis house,” and ...

Book 10  p. 61
(Score 0.78)

  Previous Page Previous Results   Next Page More Results

  Back Go back to Edinburgh Bookshelf

Creative Commons License The scans of Edinburgh Bookshelf are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.