Edinburgh Bookshelf

Edinburgh Bookshelf

Search

Index for “images/thumbs/memorials/memorials_v1_Page_433”

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 327 his troops, and the place was speedily retaken. Ever since the Cape has remained in possession of Britain. General Dundas wasappointed Governor of Dumbarton Castle in 1819. He died at his house in Shandwick Place, Edinburgh, on the 4th of January 1824, after a long and painful illness, “which he supported with the patience of a Christian, and the fortitude of a soldier.” The next of the military figures, with the volunteer cap and feather, in the centre of the Promenade, is SIX HENRY JARDINE. His father, the Rev. Dr. John Jardine-who died in 1766, aged fifty-one, and in the twentyfifth year of his ministry-was one of the ministers of Edinburgh, one of the Deans of the Chapel-Royal, and Dean of the Order of the Thistle. His mother was a daughter of Provost Drummond, of whose patriotic exertions for the city of Edinburgh, the New Town and the Royal Infirmary are honourable memorials. Sir Henry was brought up to the profession of the law, and passed a Writer to the Signet in 1790. He was appointed golicitor of Taxes for Scotland in 1793 ; Depute King’s Remembrancer in the Exchequer in 1802 ; and King’s Remembrancer in 1820, which latter office he held till the total change of the Court of Exchequer in Scotland in 1831. He was knighted by George the Fourth in 1825. Sir Henry was the original Secretary to the Committee for raising the Royal Edinburgh Volunteers in 1794, of which corps he was appointed a Lieutenant on the 20th October of the same year; a Captain in 1799 ; and Major in March 1801. He was the last individual alive enumerated in the original list of officers ; and he was one of three trustees for managing the fund remaining, after the Volunteers were disbanded, for behoof of any member of the corps in distress. Sir Henry Jardine was long conspicuous as a public-spirited citizen, there being few institutions for the promotion of any useful or national object of which he was not a member. In the lists of the year 1838 his name appeared as one of the Councillors of the Royal Society of Edinburgh; one of the Vice-Presidents of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland; one of the Extraordinary Directors of the Royal Institution for the Encouragement of the Fine Arts,; one:of the Ordinary Directors of the Scottish Naval and Military Academy; one of the Brigadier-Generals of the Royal Company of Archers ; one of the Councillors of the Skating Club ; one of the Directors of the Assembly Rooms, George Street ; and one of the Sub-Committee of Directors of the Royal Association of Contributors to the National Monument. He was also one of the Ordinary Directors of the Bank of Scotland ; one of the ”rustees for the Encouragement of Scottish Manufactures ; one of the Trustees for Promoting the British White Herring Fishery j and one of the Vice-Presidents of the Caledonian Horticultural Society. With the charitable and humane institutions of the city the name of Sir Henry was not less extensively associated. He was one of the Managers of the Orphan Hospital; one of the Auditors of the Society of the Industrious ......

Book 9  p. 436
(Score 0.67)

142 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. to have been the same that k n o t alludes to as one of the private oratories existing in hi8 time, in which ‘‘ The baptismal fonts are still remaining.” It is described by him as a building nigh the Weigh-house, on the south side of the Castle Hill, which has been set apart for devotion.’ This idea, first suggested by him, of these ornamental niches having been originally intended for baptismal fonts, has been repeated by some of the most careful writers on the antiquities of Edinburgh in our own day, although the fitness of such an appendage to a private oratory seems very questionable indeed. From our own observation, we are inclined to believe that, in the majority of cases, they were simply ornamental recesses or cupboards ; and this is the more confirmed, from their most common position being at the side of the fireplace, and the base in nearly all of them being a flat and generally projecting ledge, “We doubt not,” Arnot adds, “but that many more of the present dwelling-houses in Edinburgh have formerly been consecrated to religious purposes ; but to discover them would be much less material than difficult ! ” It may reasonably be regretted that one who professed to treat of our local antiquities, should have ‘dismissed, in so summary and contemptuous a manner, this interesting portion of his subject, for which, as he acknowledges, he possessed numerous facilities now beyond our reach. A house of a very different appearance from any yet described occupies a prominent position on the north Castle bank, and associates the surrounding district with the name of Scotland’s great pastoral poet, Allan Ramsay. The house is of a fantastic shape, but it occupies a position that, we may safely say, could not be surpassed in any city in Europe, as the site of a ‘( Poet’s Nest.” It is surrounded by a beautiful garden, and though now in the very heart of the city, it still commands a magnificent and varied prospect, bounded only on the distant horizon by the Highland hills. At the time of its erection, it was a suburban retreat, uniting the attractions of a country villa, with an easy access to the centre of the city. We have been told by a gentleman of antiquarian tastes, from information communicated to him nearly fifty years ago, that Ramsay applied to the Crown for as much ground from the Castle Hill as would serve him to build a cage for his hra?, meaning his wife, to whom he was warmly attached, and hence the octagon shape it assumed, not unlike an old parrot cage 1 If so, she did not live to share its comforts, her death having occurred in 1743. Here the poet retired in his sixtieth year, anticipating the enjoyment of its pleasing seclusion for many years to come ; and although he had already exhausted his energies in the diligent pursuit of business, he spent, in this lovely retreat, the chief portion of the last twelve years of his life in ease and tranquil enjoyment, though interrupted towards its close by a painful malady. He was remarkably cheerful and lively to the last, and his powers of conversation were such, that his company was eagerly‘courted by all ranks of society; yet he delighted in nothing so much as seeing himself surrounded by his own family and their juvenile companions, with whom he would join in their sports with the most hearty life and good-humour. * Amot, p. 245. . ......

Book 10  p. 153
(Score 0.67)

212 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. On the south side of the Parliament Close, near to John’s Coffeehouse, was the banking- house established by Sir William Forbes, the well-known author of the “ Life of Dr Beattie,” as well as of other works, and one of the most benevolent and public-spirited citizens of whom Edinburgh ever had to boast. Though descended from the ancient Lords Pitsligo, attainted for their fidelity to the Stuarts, he commenced life as an apprentice with the noted bankers, Messrs Coutts, and on their final establishment in London, he founded the banking company so long known by his name.’ So successful was he in life, that he accomplished his long-cherished purpose of recovering the attainted estates of the Barony of Pitsligo, which are now possessed by his descendants. Adjoining the banking-house of this eminent citizen, Kay, the ingenious delineator of the (‘ Edinburgh Characters,” kept the small print-shop where he vended his portraits and caricatures during nearly the whole of his career as an artist. His windows were alwaya filled with his newest etching, and formed a centre of attraction to the numerous loungers of the close, some of the most noted among whom-both lawyers and clients-were the frequent subjects of his pencil. An ancient thoroughfare led from the centre of this range of buildings to the Cowgate by a broad flight of steps, latterly called the Back Stairs, of which we furnish a view, showing the original state of the great south window of the Parliament Hall. It is occasionally called by writers of last century the New Stairs, but a passage of some kind undoubtedly led through the nether kirkyard to the Cowgate at an early period, affording ready access from that fashionable suburb, to the collegiate church of St Giles’s, and the centre of the High Town. For this the Parliament Stairs were probably substituted about 1636, and continued from that time to form a convenient communication between the High Street and the Cowgate, until their recent demolition to make way for the new Court Houses. The booths which disfigured the old cathedral front, forming the north side of the close, have already been mentioned ; these were almost exclusively occupied by the goldsmiths, whose hall was attached to the Parliament House, where the lobby of the Signet .Library now stands. Chambers furnishes in his ‘‘ Traditions’’ an amusing picture of the expectant rustic bridegroom’s visit to the Parliament Close, on the eve of his marriage, in order to provide those indispensable household gear, the silver-spunes. On such occasions it was usual for the goldsmith to adjourn with his customer to John’s Coffeehouse, to receive the order over a caup of ale or a dram, when the goldsmith was perhaps let into the whole secret counsels of the rustic, including a history of his courtship,-in return for which he sought to astonish hii customer with the most recent marvels of city news. The spunes, however, we rather think, form, according to old-established , Now incorporated with other banking companiea under the name of the Union Bank of Scotland. ......

Book 10  p. 231
(Score 0.67)

I28 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. . In 1595, the following entry occurs in the records of the Presbytery of Edinburgh:- “Anent the desyre of James Reid, Constable of the Castell of Edinburgh, in effect craving that, seing thair was ane paroche kirk within the said Castell, command wald be given to John Brand to baptese the barnis borne in the Castell. The Presbyterie understanding that the kirk thairof is unreparitt, willis the said Constable to repair the same, and to dedicatt it for na uther use bot for preiching. Thairefter his desyre sal be answerit.” Eight years afterwards, it appears, from the same records, that the question of its being a parish was disputed, and still under discussion, and so it remains even to our own day. When Maitland wrote, the old church was divided by floors, and converted into an armoury and storehouse; and soon after his time, it must have been entirely demolished. We have been the more careful in describing the site and general character of the ancient Church of the Castle, in order to prevent its being confounded with a singularly curious and interesting ecclesiastical ediiice still remaining there, immediately to the west of the garrison chapel, the existence of which seems to have been totally lost sight of. Its external appearance, though little calculated to excite attention, leaves little reason to doubt that the original walls remain. It is still in a tolerably perfect condition, consisting of a very small building, measuring sixteen feet six inches, by ten feet six inches within the nave, probably the smallest, as well as the most ancient chapel in Scotland. At the east end, there is a neatly carved,, double, round arch, separating it from a semicircular chancel, with a plain alcoved ceiling. It is decorated with the usual Norman- zigzag mouldings, and finished on the outer side by a border of lozenge-shaped ornaments, the pattern of which is curiously altered as it approaches the spring of the’ arch. No traces of ornament are now apparent within the chancel, a portion of the building usually BO highly decorated, but the space is so small, that the altar, with its customary appendages, would render any further embellishment immaterial. There have been formerly two pillars on each side, supporting the arch, with plain double cushion capitals, which still remain, as well as two of the bases, but the shafts of all the pillars are now wanting, and the opening of the arch is closed in with a rude brick partition in order to adapt the chancel to its modern use as a powder magazine. The original windows of the chapel have all been built up or enlarged, but sufficient remains can be traced to show that they have been plain, round-headed, and very narrow openinga. The original doorway is also built up, but may still be seen in the north wall, close to the west end, an arrangement not unusual in such small chapels, and nearly similar to that at Craigmillar Castle. This interesting edifice is now abandoned to the same uses as the larger church was in Wodrow &fisc., vul. i. p. 463. \’rGNETm-Mouldioga of the Chancel Arch, from the Chapel in the Castle. ......

Book 10  p. 139
(Score 0.66)

16 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. ‘of the Chancellor, in the Castle of Edinburgh. His increasing years, however, seem to have led to his enjoying greater liberty of person, as well as deference to his opinion. Under the guidance of the Bishops of Aberdeen and Moray, then residing in Edinburgh, a conference was held in the church of St Giles, between him and his rival guardians, which, from their mutual hatred to the Earl of Douglas, again led to an amicable arrangement, the King making choice of Edinburgh Castle as the place where he should continue to reside. No sooner were the rival statesmen reconciled, than they consulted together to aecure the overthrow of the Douglas, whose exorbitant power was employed for the most oppressive and tyrannical objects. To have openly proceeded against him as a criminal, while at the head of his numerous forces, would only have proved the sequel for a civil war. He was accordingly invited to Edinburgh, with the most flattering assurances of friendship. On the way, the Chancellor met him at Crichton Castle, about twelve miles &E. of Edinburgh, where he was entertained with every mark of hospitality, insomuch so as to have excited the jealous fears of his friends. He rode thereafter to the Castle of Edinburgh, accompanied by his brother and Sir Malcolm Fleming of Cumbernauld : they were received with every show of welcome, and admitted to the same table with the King ; but, towards t.he close of the entertainment, a bull’s head, the well-known symbol of destruction, was set before them. They recognised the fatal signal, and sprang from the board, but being immediately surrounded by armed men, they were led forth, in defiance of the tears and entreaties of the young King, and immediately beheaded 66 in the back court of the Castle that lyeth to the west ; ” or, according to Balfour, in the great hall of the Castle.’ In the year 1753, some workmen digging for a foundation to a new storehouse within the Castle, found the golden handles and plates of a coffin, which are supposed to have belonged to that in which the Earl of Douglas was interred8 From a protest afterwards taken by the son of Sir Malcolm Fleming, against the sentence of his father, as being unwarrantable and illegal, as well as from the fact of no attempt being made to bring the Chancellor to trial for the deed when the Douglas faction prevailed, there would seem to have been some form of trial, and a sentence of condemnation pronounced, with the assumed authority of the King.+ The popular estimation of the deed may be inferred from the rude rhymes quoted by Hume of Godscroft :- “ Edinburgh Castle, towne and tower, God grant thou sinke for sinne ; An’ that even for the black dinner Earle Douglm gat therein.” The Chancellor continued to maintain possession of the Castle, even when the Douglas party succeeded in obtaining the guardianship of the young King, and used the royal authority for demanding its surrender. Here he held out during a siege of nine months, till he succeeded in securing satisfactory terms for himself; while of his less fortunate coadjutors some only redeemed their lives with their estates, and the others, including three members of the Livingstone family, were all tried and beheaded within its walls. History of the Douglasses, 1643, p. 165. Arnot, p. 11. * Balfour’s Aunals, vol. i. p. 169. ‘ Nartial Achievements, vol. ii. p. 330. ......

Book 10  p. 17
(Score 0.66)

42 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. magnificence, and such displays of loyal attachment, as testified the hearty welcome of the people. The young Queen was of R most tender and affectionate disposition; she seems to have given ‘(Her hand with her heart in it ” to her royal lover, with a gentle spirit of resignation. So soon a8 she stepped on the Scottish shore, she knelt and kissed the ground, praying for all happiness to her adopted country and people ; but ere six weeks had elapsed, the pomp of worldly honour that had greeted her arrival, was called to follow the young bride to the tomb. She was buried with the greatest mourning Scotland ever, till that time, was participant of, in the church of Holyrood House, near King James 11.’ Buchanan, who was an eye-witness, says it was the f i s t instance of mourning-dresses being worn by the Scots ; and triumph and mirrinea was all turned into deregies and soul1 massis, verrie lamentable to behold.” Sir David Lindsay, in a poem of singular inequality, has expressed his Deploratioun of the Deith of Quene Magdalene. He thus apostrophises (Crewel1 Deith) : - Theif ! raw thow nocht the p i t preparatyvis Of Edinburgh, the nobill famous toun, Thow saw the pepill, lauboring for thair lyvis, To mak tryumphe, with trump, and clarioun ; Sic plesour waa never into this regioun, A8 suld haif bene the day of hir entrsce, With greit propynis,‘ gevin till hir Grace.‘ Thow saw makand right costlie scaffalding, Depaintit weill, with gold, and &sure fyne, Reddye preparit for the upsetting, With fontanis, flowing water cleir, and wyne, Disagysit folks: lyke creaturis divyne, On ilk scaffold, to play ane syndrie storie, Bot, all in greiting turnit thow that glorie. Provest, baillies, and lordis of the toun, And princis of the preistis venerabill, Full plesandlye in thair processioun, With all the cunnyng clerkis honorabill ; The herauldis, with their awful vestimentis, With maseris upon ather of thair handis, To rewle the press, with burneist silver wandis. Syne, last of all, in ordour-tl-gumphall, That maist illuster Princee honorabill, With hir the lustye ladyis of Scotland, Quhilk sulde haif bene ane sicht maist delectabil : Hir rayment to rehers, I am nocht habill, Of gold, and perle, and precious stonis brycht, Twinklyog lyke aterris in ane fostie nycht. Under ane pale of golde scho suld haif paat, Be burgeis borne, clothit in silkie fyne, ; 1 Hawthornden, p, 104. Ibid. a Pitacottie, vol. ii. p 374. 4 Presents. Disguised folk or &ora. a Macer. ......

Book 10  p. 46
(Score 0.66)

442 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. Sir Walter Scott, who, moreover, evidently writes with an imperfect recollection of what he had heard ; whereas Mr Sharpe’s own grandfather was proprietor of Dalry at the period, and he has himself often heard the facts related by his father, who was present when the discovery was made. The reader, however, has now both versions of the story, and may adopt which of them pleases him best :- a DEAR SIR,-~ return the curious and particular account of Sir George Lockhart’s murder by Chiesley of Dalry. It is worthy of antiquarian annotation, that Chiesley was appointed to be gibbetted, not far from his own house, somewhere about Drumsheugh. As he waB a man of family, the gibbet was privately cut down, and the body carried off. A good many yean since, some alterations were in the course of being made in the house of Dab, when, on enlarging a closet or cellar in the lower story, a discovery was made of a skeleton, and some fragments of iron, which (were) generally supposed to be the bones of the murderer Chiesley. His friends had probably concealed them there when they were taken down from the gibbet, and no opportunity had occurred for removing them before their existence was forgotten. I was told of the circumstance by Mr James Walker, then my brother in office, and proprietor of Dalry, I do not, however, recollect the exact circumstance, but I dare say Francis Walker Drummond can supply my deficiency of memory.-Yonrs truly, WALTERS COTT. Shandwick Place, 15th Januky 1829. To E. W. A. Drummond Hay, Esq.” . XII. SIR DAVID LINDUY. IN the quotation from Sir David Lindsay’s Complaynt (page 39), the text of Chalmers has been followed. Slight as the change is that its punctuation requires to render it correct, the alteration in its sense is very con- - siderable. It should be read thus :- ‘‘ The first sillabia that thow did mute Was pa, dn, Lyn. Then playit I twentie springis perqueir, Quhilk was greit plesour for to heir.” Upon the lute ‘‘ Any old woman in Scotland,” says Sir Walter Scott, in his notes to Marmion, will bear witnesfl that pa, da, Lyn, are the first efforts of a child to say where’s David findsay?” A still better reading of it has been suggested, and the true one, as we think, viz., Play Davy Lindsay. The poems of Lindsay have now ceased to occupy the place they so long held in the library of the Scottish cottage, yet some trace of their former study is still preserved in the common rustic expression of scepticism-It ’8 no between th brocls o’ Davy Limdsay!- implying that not even Lindsay, whom nothing escapes, has noticed the thing in queation. XIII. UMFRAVILLE’S CROSS. A FEW additional notices of the Scottish Umfrafilles may perhaps help to suggest a clue ta the date of erection of the ancient cross that formerly stood on the boundary of the Borough Muir, at St Leonard’s Loan (page 293.) In the year 1304, Edward, Longshanks, granted an indemnity to the Scots under certain conditions, one of which imposed a graduated scale of fines on the Scottish clergy and nobles, proportioned in ita aeve~tyto the opposit.ion h.e ha d encountered from them, and the tardiness of their submission to his power. The heaviest of ......

Book 10  p. 481
(Score 0.65)

448. MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. Till by old age you gently die, To live immortal in the sky. To own my faults I have no will, For I have done both good and ill ; Aa to the crime for which I die, To my laat gasp, Not guilty, I. But to this magisterial hate I shall aasign the pristine date. When the intrepid, matchless Charles Came here with many Highland Car4 And o’er my top, in public sight, Proclaim’d aloud his Father’s Right ; From that day forth it waa agreed, That I should a8 a %be1 bleed ; And at this time they think it meet. To snatch my fabric off the street, Lest I should tell to them once more The tale I told ten years before, At my deatroyers bear no grudge, Nor do you 8 t h their mason-lodge, Tho’ well may all by-standers nee That better masona built up me. The royal statue in the close Will share the fate of me, poor Crosa ; Heav’ns, earth, and sea, all in a range, Like me, will perish for Ezcliangc“ Few civic events connected with the destruction of old, or the rearing of new buildings, escape the poet’s notice. One poem records the repair of the Abbey Church ; another mourns the &ling of ita sepulchres ; a third refers to the laying the foundation-stone of St Bernard’s Mineral Well, 15th September 1760 ; while between these are lampoons and eulogies on old citizens, most of them long since forgotten. The fate of the Nether Bow Port, which he witnessed, forms the subject of some of hirr wittiest prose, in ‘&A Sermon preached by Claudero, on the Condemnation of the Nether Bow Porch of Edinburgh, 9th July 1764, before a crowded audience.” A brief extract from this will suftice for an example of his humour, which is the more curious, as what was then extravagant hyperbole, sounds now like the shrewdest foresight :- (‘ What was too hard for the great ones of the earth, yea even queens, to effect, is now, even now in our day, accomplished. No patriot duke opposeth the scheme, aa did the p a t hull in the grand senate of our nation ; therefore the project shall go into execution, and down shall Edina’s lofty porches be hurled with a vengeance. -Streets shall be extended to the east, regular and beautiful, as far as the Frigate Whins, and Port0 Bello shall be a lodge for the captom of tea and brandy. The city shall be joined to Leith on the North, and a procession of &e masons shall there lay the foundation of a spacious harbour. Pequin or Nanquin shall not-be able to compare with Edina for magnificence. Our city shall be the greatest wonder of the world ; and the fame of its glory shall reach the distant ends of the earth. “No more shall the porch resound to the hammer of the cheerful Zaccheus ; and hia neighbours are bathed in team at the overthrow of his well-tuned anvil. I‘ The Nether Bow coffee-house of the loyal Smieton can now no longer enjoy ita ancient name with propriety ; and from henceforth !& Revolutiun Cofeehousc shall its name be called. “ Our gates must be extended wide for accommodating the gilded chariots, which, from the luxury of the age, are become numeroua-With an impetuous career they jostle against one another in our streets, and the u n w q foobpasaenger is in danger of being crushed to piecea ......

Book 10  p. 487
(Score 0.65)

256 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. Such of the title-deeds of this property as we have obtained access to are unfortunately quite modern, and contain no reference to early proprietors; but one of the present owners described a sculptured stone, containing a coat of arms surmounted by a mitre, that was removed from over the inner doorway A very fine specimen of the ancient within the last few years at the head of some years since, and which appears to have been the Kennedy arms. If it be permissible to build on such slender data, in the absence of all other evidence, we have here, in all probability, the town mansion of the good , Bishop Kennedy, the munificent patron of learning, and the able and upright counsellor of James 11. and 111.' The whole appearance of the building is perfectly consistent with this supposition. The form and decorations of the doorways, particularly those already described, all prove an early date ; while the large size and elegant mouldings of the windows, and the massive appearance of the wbole building, indicate such magnscence as would well consort with the dignity of the primacy at that early period. timber-fronted lands of the Old Town stood till Trunk's Close, behind the Fountain Well, on the site of a plain stone tenement that has since replaced it. The back portion of the old building, however, still remains entire, including several rooms with fine stuccoed ceilings, and one large hall beautifully finished with richly carved pillasters and oak panneling, which is described in the title-deeds as " presently "--i.e., in 1739--" a meeting-house possest by Mr William Cocburn, minister of the gospel." It had previously formed the residence of Sir John Scot of Ancrum, the first of that title, who was created a baronet by Charles 11. in 1671. From him it was acquired by Sir Gilbert Elliot of Stobs, in 1703, and here resided that baronet, and his more illustrious son, General Elliot, the gallant defender of Gibraltar, better known by his title of Lord Heathfield. On the pediment over the window of a fine old stone land on the west side of Trunk's Close, is the inscription in bold characters :-HODIE MIHI * CRAS - TIBI - It is worthy of notice that the same inscription is appropriately carved in similar characters over the splendid toinb of Thomas Bannatine, in the Greyfriars' Churchyard. Several other ancient tenements in this close are worthy of inspection for their antique irregularity of construction. But the chief Lion among the venerable fabrics of the Old Town of Edinburgh has long been the singularly picturesque structure which terminates the High Street towards the east, and forms the mansion provided shortly after the Reformation, at the expense of the town, for its f i s t parish minister, the great Reformer, John Knox. Chambers remarks A confused tradition of its having been an Episcopal residence is still preserved among the inhabitants, founded, it may be presumed, on the sculptured mitre. The old dame who first admitted US to inspect it, stated that it was Bishop 8undiEands' house; a name, it is perhaps unnecessary to remark, not to be found in Keith's li8t. VroNEmE-Ancient Sculpture, Sandilands' close. ......

Book 10  p. 277
(Score 0.65)

30 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. the various royal servitors, affording a curious insight into the crafts of the period. brief extract will s&ce :- A Cunyouris, carvouria, and carpentaris, Beildaris of barkis, and ballingaria ; Masounis, lyand upon the land, And schip wrichtis hewand upone the strand ; Glaaing wrichtis, goldsmythis, and lapidaria, Pryntouris, paptouris, and potingaris ; &c. The introduction of printers in the list, shows the progress literature was making at this time; as early as 1490, the Parliament enjoined the education of the eldest sons of all barons and freeholders, in the Latin language, as well as in science and jurisprudence; but it was not till 1507 that the art of printing was introduced into Scotland, under the royal auspices, when a patent was granted to Walter Chepman and Andrew Myllar, conferring on them the exclusive privilege of printing there. Some of Dunbar's own poems seem to have been among the very first productions that issued from their press, and form now very Bcarce and highly valued reliques of the art. It affords evidence of the success that attended the printing press, immediately on its introduction, that, in the year 1513, Walter Chepman founded a Chaplainry at the altar of St John the Evangelist, on the southern side of St Giles's Church, and endowed it with an annuity of twenty-three marks.' But, perhaps, the most lively characteristics of the times,. occur in " The Flytings " of Kennedy and Dunbar, already referred to,--a most singular feature of the age, afterwards copied by their successors,-in which many local and personal allusions are to be found. These poems consist of a series of pungent satires, wherein each depicts his rival in the most ridiculous characters, and often in the coarsest language. This literary gladiatorship originated in no personal enmity, but seems to have been a friendly trial of wits for the amusement of the court. A few extracts, in connection with our local history, will suffice, as specimens of these most singular literary effusions. Dunbar addresses Kennedy,'- Thou brings the Carrick clay to Edinburgh Cross, Upon thy buitinga hobbland hard aa horn, Strae wisps hing out quhair that the wata ar worn ; We sal1 gar skale our Schulia all thee to acorn, Come thou again to skar us with thy straea, And atane thee up the oahy as thou gaes. The boys of Edinburgh, as the bees out thaws, And c y s out ay, Heir cum8 our awin queer Clerk I Then fleia thou like a houlat chaist with craws, Quhyle all the bitches at thy buitinga bark, Then carlings cry, Keip curches in the merk, Our gallows gapes, 10 I quhair ane graceless gaes : Anither saya, I see him want a eark, I red ye, Kimmer, tak in your lining dais. 1 Maitland, p. 271. a These extracts from a' The Flyting" are taken, with a few verbal exceptions, from Ramssy's Evergreen, an being more easily understood by the general reader, than the pure version of Mr Laing. ......

Book 10  p. 32
(Score 0.65)

ST LEONARD’S, ST MARY’S WYND, AND CO WGATE. 321 character, and with a shield in the centre, the armorial bearings of which have been replaced by a brewer’s barrel, the device of its modern owner and occupant. We have found, on examining ancient charters and title-deeds referring to property in the Cowgate, much greater difliculty in assigning the exact tenements referred to, from the absence of such marked and easily recognisable features as serve for a guide in the Bigh Street and Canongate. All such evidence, however, tends to prove that the chief occupants of this ancient thoroughfare were eminent for rank and station, and their dwellings appear to have been chiefly in the front street, showing that, with patrician exclusiveness, traders were forbid to open their booths within its dignified precincts. Another feature, no less noticeable, is the extensive possessions which the Church held within its bounds. An ancient land, for example, which occupied the site of one now standing at the foot of Blair Street, on the west side, is described in the titles of the adjoining property as pertaining to the Altar of St Katharine, in the Kirk-of-Field. In 1494, Walter Bertram, Provost of Edinburgh, bestowed an annual rent from his tenement in the Cowgate “to a chaplain of St Lawrence’s Altar, in St Giles’ Church.” In 1528, Wm. Chapman “ mortified to a chaplain in St Giles’ Kirk, at Jesus’ Altar, in a chapel built by himself,” a tenement and piece of ground in the same street, reserving to ye patrons yrof 26s. 8d. for repairing the chapel with skletts and glass.” Both Walter Chepman and Thomas Cameron have already-been named aa similar donors. We shall only notice one more from the same source :-“A mortification made be Janet Remedy, Lady Bothwell, who was before spouse to Archibald Earl of Angus, mortefeing to a chaplain in the Marie Kirk in the Field, beside Edinburgh, her fore land of umqle Hew Berries tenement, and chamber adjacent y’to, lying in the Cowgait, on the south side of the street, betwixt Ja. Earl of Buchan’s land on the east, and Thos. Tod’s on ye west.”l We have dready referred to U the Erle of Maris, now present Regent, lugeing in the Kowgait,’Pin 1572,” and other eminent laymen will presently appear among the residenters in this patrician quarter of the town. The destruction of an ancient tenement in the Cowgate, in the month of June 1787, when clearing the ground for the building of the South Bridge, brought to light some curious memorials of an earlier age. The workmen employed in its demolition discovered a cavity containing a quantity of money for the reception of which it appeared to have been constructed. The treasure was found, on examination, to consist of a number of small coins of Edward L commonly called Longshanks, who, in the year 1295, defeated the Scots at Dunbar, and soon after compelled the Castle of Edinburgh to surrender to his . A perfect inventar of Pious Donations. MS. Advocated KO., Diurnal of Occurrenta, p, 299. 2s ......

Book 10  p. 349
(Score 0.65)

I02 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. which he was burned, on the sloping bank at Greenside,’ has been rescued, only within the last year, from all profane associations, by the erection of the new Lady Glenorchy’s Chapel thereon. The fall of this great master of the black art would seem to have been peculiarly fatal to its votaries ; as many as ten witches were burnt in the city during the 6ame year. In the following pear, while the Palace of Holpood was undergoing repair for the residence of the Duke of York, afterwards James VII., the unhappy prisoners taken at the battle of Bothwell Bridge were brought to Edinburgh, and the greater number of them confined for five months, during the most inclement season of the year, in the inner Greyfriars’ Churchyard, that long narrow slip of ground, enclosed with an iron gate, which extends between the grounds of Heriot’s Hospital and the old Poor’s House. They were exposed there during the whole of that period, without any shelter from the weather; yet the whole of them remained faithful to their principles, although they could at once have procured their liberty by acknowledging the rising at Bothwell to have been rebellion. In 1680, the Duke of York arrived in Edinburgh, as Commissioner from the King to the Scottish Parliament, along with his Duchess, Nary DEste, daughter of the Duke of Modena, celebrated by Dryden and other wits of the time for her beauty. The Lady Anne, his daughter, afterwards Queen Anne, also accompanied him on this occasion, and greatly contributed, by her easy and affable manners, towards the popularity which he was so desirous to acquire. The previous vicegerents had rendered themselves peculiarly obnoxiouti to all classes, and thereby prepared the people the more readily to appreciate the urbanity of the Duke. “ He behaved himself,” says Bishop Burnet, ‘‘ upon his first going to Scotland, in so obliging a manner, that the nobility and gentry, who had been so long trodden on by the Duke of Lauderdale, found a very sensible change; so that he gained much on them all. It was visibly his interest to make that kingdom sure to him, and to give them such an essay of his government as might dissipate all hard thoughts of him, with which the world was possessed.’’ To the success with which he pursued this course of policy may be, to some extent, attributed the strong attachment which the Scottish nobility afterwards displayed to the House of Stuart, which led to the rebellions in 171 5 and 1745. A grand entertainment was provided for him in the Parliament House, which was fitted up at great expense for the occasion. The Duchess, the Lady Anne, and the principal nobles at the Scottish Court, were present on the occasion, and the expense of the banquet was npwards of d214,OOO Scottish money. During the Duke’s residence at Edinburgh, a splendid court was kept at Holyrood Palace. The rigid decorum of Scottish manners- gradually gave way before the affability of such noble entertainers ; and the novel luxuries of the English Court formed an additional attraction to the Scottish grandees. Tea was introduced for the first time into Scotland on this occasion, and given by the Duchess, as a great treat to the Scottish ladies who The city spared no expense to welcome the Duke of York. Chambers’s Minor Antiquities, p. 85. Burnet’s Hist., Edin. Ed., vol. ii. p. 322. On the authority of ‘‘a gentleman who had the spot pointed out to him by his father sixty years ago ” (1833). ......

Book 10  p. 111
(Score 0.65)

40 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. * * * Ilk man efter thair qualitie, Thay did solist his Majestie, Sum gad him ravel1 at the rakket, Some harlit him to the hurly hakket. And sum to schaw their courtlie corsis, Wald ryid to,Leith, and rin tbair horsis. at the last thair vaiked ane benefice quhilk pat thame all at variance for the dispositioun of the same.”l And so, after dividing with more or less success the patronage of the crown, the nobles parted in greater disagreement than ever ; “ bot Bischope James Beatoun remained &till in Edinburgh, in his awin ludging, quhilk he biggit in the Frieris Wynd.” ’ C1525.1 The nominal rule of the youthful Sovereign proved of little avail to stay the turbulence of hia haughty nobles ; Angus again seized the government, nominating his uncle, Archibald Douglas, Provost of Edinburgh. And such waa the power he possessed, that, under his protection, the assassins of M’Lellan of Bombie, who was slain in open day at the door of St Giles’s Church, walked with impunity about the streets ; while the Queen herself deemed his safe conduct. necessary, while she resided in Edinburgh, though the Parliament was sitting there at the time. And so the King returned again to honourable durance in the dilapidated palace of the Castle ; or only made his appearance to act as the puppet of his governor. At this time it was that Arran and his faction demanded that the Parliament should assemble within the Castle, to secure them against popular coercion ; but Angus, and a numerous body of the nobles, and others, protested ‘‘ that the Parliament be kept in the accustomed place, and that the King be conveyed along the High Street, and in triumph shown to his own people.” And this being denied them, they surrounded the Castle with two thousand men in arms, completely preventing the supplies of the garrison. Those in the Castle retaliated, by firing on the town : but their differences were happily accommodated, and “ the King in. magnificence and pomp is convoyed from the Castle to his palace at Holyrood House, and the Estates assemble in the wonted place of the town of Edinburgh.” C1526.1 The Earl of Lennox assembled a numerous body of adherents in the following year, and marched towards Edinburgh to the rescue of the King; but Angus not only caused the provost to ring the alarum bell, and raise the town in his defence, but he persuaded the Eing, though much against his will, to head the burgher force against his own friends. “Then the King caused sound his trumpets, and lap upon horse, and caused ring the commoun bell of Edinburgh, commanding all manner of men to follow him ; so he issued forth at the Wast Port, and the touoes of Edinburgh and Leith with him, to the number of thrie thousand men, and passed forwards with thame,” but only to arrive in time to witness the death of the Earl of Lennox, and the complete discomfiture of his Paw. C1528.1 Frequent attempts were made thereafter for the King’s delivery from this thraldom ; but that which so many had failed in securing, he at length effected, by his’ own Pitscottig vol. ii p. 312. Ibid, p. 313. 8 Hawthornden, p. 93. ......

Book 10  p. 43
(Score 0.64)

64 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. including the Earls of Argyle and Glencairn, and the Lord James Stewart. The place of meeting was the Quarry Holes, or as it is not inappropriately styled by the writers of the time, the Quarrel Holes ; a famous place of meeting for duels and private rencontres, at the east end of the Calton Hill, in the immediate neighbourhood of the Palace of Holyrood- and there the two first-named Earls engaged, that should the Regent fail to fulfil the conditions of agreement, and especially that of the dismissal of the French troops, they would willingly join forces with them to enforce their fulfilment.‘ Although the main body of the reformers had withdrawn from Edinburgh, Nome of the leaders continued to reside there, and the people refused to yield up St Giles’s Church to be again used for means, to recover it. She had already received notice of further assistance coming from France, and did not choose to provoke a quarrel till thus reinforced. As one means of driving them from the church, the French soldiers made it a place of promenade during the time of service, to the great disturbance of the Congregation. But though the preacher, Mr Willocks, denounced them in no measured terms from the pulpit, and publicly prayed God to rid them of guch locusts, the people prudently avoided an open rupture, (‘ except that a horned cap was taken off a proud priest’s head, and cut in four quarters, because he said he would wear it in spite of the Congregation.” In the month of September 1559, Sir Ralph Sadler arrived at Berwick from Queen Elizabeth, and entered into secret negotiations with the reformers, paying over to them, for their immediate use, the sum of two thousand pounds, with the promise of further pecuniary assistance, for the purpose of expelling the French from Scotland, so that it could be managed with such secrecy as not to interfere with the public treaties between the two nations. The Queen had already received a reinforcement of a thousand French troops, who disembarked at Leith in the end of August, and with their aid she immediately proceeded to enlarge and complete the fortifications of that port, while she renewed her entreaties to the French Court for further aid. Shortly after, the Bishop of Amiens arrived at Edinburgh, aN legate from the Pope, and earnestly laboured to reconcile the reformers to the Church ; but any little influence he might possibly have had, was destroyed in their eyes by the discovery that he had arrived in company with a second body of French auxiliaries. The Congregation at length marched to Edinburgh, towards the end of October, with a force amounting to twelve thousand men, resolved to dislodge the French garrison from Leith ; and the same day the Regent hastily retreated from Holyrood Palace, and took up her residence within the protection of the fortifications at Leith. The Congregation proceeded in the most systematic manner,-conmittees were chosen for the direction of civil and religious affairs, and a letter was immediately addressed to the , I the service of the mass, although the Regent sought, by various The preparations for war were now diligently pursued by both parties. * Bishop Keith, vol. i. p. 224. * Calderwood, vol. i. p. 502. VIQNETTE--COFbel from the old south door of St ailea’a Church. ......

Book 10  p. 69
(Score 0.64)

272 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. Wynd, and paid up the cloiss which is under the Endmyleis Well.9’ 1 Jvhether this be the same well is doubtful, as no close lower down appears as a thoroughfare in early or later maps ; it is evident, however, that the name of the Fountain Close is derived from some other, and probably much more -mportant, conduit than the plain structure beside John Knox’s house, which has long borne the same designation. On the east side of the close, directly opposite the entrance to Bassendyne’s house, an ancient entrance of a highly ornamental character appears. It consists of two doorways, &th narrow pilasters on each side supporting the architrave, which is adorned with a variety of inscriptions, as represented in the accompanying woodcut, and altogether forms a remarkably neat and elegant design. “his is the mansion of Adam Fullerton, whose name is carved over the left doorway-an eminent and influential citizen in the reign of Queen Mary, and an active colleague and coadjutor of Edward Hope in the cause of the &formation. In 1561, his name appears as one of the bailies of Edinburgh, who, along with Archibald Douglas of Kilspindie, the provost, laid hold of a poor craftsman who had been guilty of the enormity of playing Robin Hood, and condemned him to be hangeda procedure which ended in the mob becoming masters of the town, and compelling the magistrates to sue for the mediation of the Governor of the Castle, and at length fairly to succumb to the rioters.’ Only two months after this commotion, Queen Mary landed at Leith, and was loyally entertained by the town of Edinburgh-Adam Fullerton, doubtless, taking a prominent part among her civic hosts. In the General Assembly held at Leith, January 16, 1571, his name occur8 as commissioner of the town of Edinb~rgh.~ On the 23d of June following, during the memorable siege of Edinburgh by the Regent Mar, in the name of the infant King, the burgesses of the capital who favoured the Regent, to the number of two hundred men, united themselves into a band, and passing privately to Leith, which was then held by the Regent’s forces; they there made choice of Adam Fullerton for their captain.l The consequence of this was his being “ denuncit our souerane ladiea rebell, and put to the horne ” on the 18th of August following ; and “ vpoun the tuantie nynt day of the said moneth, James Duke .of Chattellarault, George Erle of Huntlie, Alexander Lord Home, accumpanyit with diuerse prelatis and barronis, past to the tolbuith of Edinburgh; and thair sittand in parliament, the thrie estaitts being convenit, foirfaltit Matho Erle of Lennox, James Erle of Mortoun, John Erle of Mar,” and many other nobles, knights, and burgesses, of the Parliament, foremost among the latter of whom ia Adam Fullerton, burgess of Edinburgh, “ and decernit ilk ane of thame to Pitcairn’s Criminal Trials, Supplement, p. 567. Diurnal of Occurrents, p, 283 ; ante, p. 69. Booke of the Univeraall Kirk, p. 208. ‘ Diurnal of Occurrenta, p. 227. Ibid, p. 239. ......

Book 10  p. 295
(Score 0.64)

176 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. and especially of U one bearing the manifest badge of Antichrist,” viz., his badge as a knight of the order of Saint Esprit? They accordingly intimated to their congregations a day of fasting and prayer on the occasion, which was duly observed, while the Frenchman was having his farewell repast. In the year 1588, the King sent Sir James Stewart, brother of the Earl of Arran, to besiege Lord Maxwell, in the Castle of Lochmaben, where he was believed to have collected a force in readiness to co-operate with an expected army from Spain, against the government. The Castle was rendered on the faith of safety promised to the garrison by Sir William Stewart; but the King, who had remained at a prudent distance from danger, now made his appearance, and with characteristic perfidy, hanged the most of them before the Castle gate. He returned to Edinburgh thereafter, bringing with him the Lord Maxwell, “who was warded in Robert Gourlaye’s hous, and committed to the custodie of Sir William Stewart.” Scarcely a week after this, Sir William quarrelled with the Earl of Bothwell, in the royal presence, where each gave the other the lie, in language sufficiently characteristic of the rudeness of manners then prevailing at the Court of Holyrood. They met a few days afterwards on the High Street, each surrounded by his retainers, when a battle immediately ensued. Sir William was driven down the street by the superior numbers of his opponents, and at length retreated into Blackfriars’ Wynd.’ There he _.stabbed one of his assailants who was pressing most closely on him, but being unable to recover his sword, he was thrust through the body by Bothwell, and so perished in the afTray,-an occurrence that excited little notice at that turbulent period, either from the citizens or the Court, and seems to have involved its perpetrator in no retributive consequences. The next occupant of note was Colonel Sempill, a cadet of the ancient family of that name, and an active agent of the Catholic party, who “came to this countrie, with the Spanish gold to the Popish Lords.’’ The Earl of Huntly, who had shown himself favourable to the Spanish emissary, was commanded, under pain of treason, to apprehend him ; and he also was accordingly warded in Robert Gourlay’s house, seemingly at the same time with Lord Maxwell. In this case, it proved an insecure prison, for he (( soone after brake waird and escaped, and that by Huntlie’s moyen and assistance; ’” and on the 20th of May of the following year, Huntly was himself a prisoner, “wairded in Robert Gourlay’s h ~ u s e , ” ~ from whence he was soon afterwards transferred to Borthwick Castle. But not only was this ancient civic mansion the abode or prison of a succession of eminent men, during the troubled years of James the Sixth’s residence in Scotland; we find that the King himself, in 1593, took refuge in the same substantial retreat, during one of those daring insurrections of the Earl of Bothwell, that so often put his Majesty’s courage to sore trial, and drove him to seek the protection of the burgher force of Edinburgh. LL The 3d of Apryle, the Birrel’s Diary, p. 24. . ’ Calderwood, vol. iv. pp. 678-681. * Ibid, vol. v. p. 65. YIQNETTE-carved Stone from Old Bank Close, in the collection of A. 0. Ellis, Esq. ......

Book 10  p. 191
(Score 0.64)

73 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. been thirty-nine years a Judge of the Supreme Court. It is somewhat remarkable that he and his two immediate predecessors occupied the same seat on the bench for a period of ninety years; Lord Ropton having been appointed a judge in 1710, and Lord Tinwald in 1744. By his wife, Lady Grace Stuart, daughter of James second Earl of Bute, and sister of the Prime Minister, John the third Earl, his lordship had seven sons, all of whom predeceased him. The second of these was Lieutenant- Colonel John Campball, whose memorable defence of Mangalore, from May 1783 to January 1784, arrested the victorious career of Tippoo Sultan, and shed a lustre over the close of that calamitous war. Lord Stonefield resided at one time in Elphinstone’s Court, and latterly in George Square. Of his lordship’s professional history no record has been preserved. As a scholar, his attainments were considerable, and as a judge, his decisions were marked by conciseness of expression and soundness of judgment. He was a zealous and liberal supporter of every scheme tending to promote the welfare and improvement of his native country. No. cxcv. JOHN HOME, ESQ., OF NINEWELLS. JOHHNO MEo, r HUME,o f Ninewells (for they are truly the same name) was the elder and only brother of Da,vid Hume, the historian.’ They were the children of Joseph Home of Ninewells and Catherine Falconer, who was a daughter of Sir David Falconer, Lord President of the College of Justice. There were two subjects of playful controversy between the historian and his kind friend John Home, author of the Tragedy of Douglas, etc. One waa about the preference of port or claret as the better liquor. David was an advocate for port ; John was strenuous for the honour of claret, aa the approved and genuine beverage of the old Scottish gentleman, in untaxed times, before the union of the kingdoms. The other controversy related to the just spelling of the surname, Home or Hum. David inclined, though with due temperance, for Hume, for which he found authority in the inscription on an old tombstonr, and in some other memorials of past times. John rejected this opinion of David’s as heterodox, and stood up stoutly on all occasions aa the hed of the How faction. With reference to these two matters, the historlan, in a codicil to his settlement, written with his own hand, expresses himself as follows :-‘‘ I leave to my friend John Home of Kilduff ten dozen of my old claret, at his choice, and one single bottle of that other liquor, called port. I also leave to him six dozen of port, provided that he attests, under his hand, signed John Humq that he haa himself alone finished that bottle at two sittinge. By this concession, he will at once terminate the only two differences that ever arose between as concerning temporal mattera.” This writing ie preeerved, but not entered on record. Mr. Humo died on the 25th of the same month. On one occasion, David jocularly proposed to John, that they should terminate the controvenry about the name, by casting lots. “Nay, Mr. Philosopher,” said John (for so he often addressed him), “that is a most extraordinary proposal indeed i for if you lose, you take your own name ; and if I lose, I take another man’s name.” It is dated 7th August 1776. He had for some weeka been io a condition of evident and increasing decay. ......

Book 9  p. 95
(Score 0.64)

264 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH, in an advertisement of the year 1798, as ‘‘ the Auld Cameronian Meeting-house.” Tradition pointed out the upper flat of the same tenement as having been the’lodging of ‘.i Nicol Muschett of ill memorie,” while a student at college, though it appears, from the evidence on his trial, that his final residence was in Dickson’s Close. This ancient tenement, which was latterly regarded with interest, as bearing the oldest date on any p‘rivate building in Edinburgh, excepting that already described in Blyth’s Close, has been recently entirely demolished, and replaced by a plain unpretending erection.‘ But we have since discovered a stone in the possession of James Gibson Craig, Esq., bearing the much earlier date of 1506, which was removed from a house taken down some years since, near the foot of this same wynd, on the opposite side. The stone appears to have formed the top of a dormer window, being triangular in shape, and surmounted by an unusually large crescent. The date is cut partly in Arabic and partly in Roman numerals, thus :-15VI. The site of this ancient fabric is now a ruinous waste, rendering it impossible to recover any traces of its proprietors, either in early or later times. Immediately adjoining the former building, on the west side of the wynd, is the venerable mansion of the Earls of Morton, an ancient timber-fionted land, already referred to in the description of Brown’s Close, Castlehill,’ with its fine Gothic doorway, and sculptured tympanum, containing a coronet supported by unicorns. Such portions of the stone front as remain exposed, exhibit the feature, which occurs so frequently in buildings of an early date, of moulded windows originally divided by stone mullions. The desolate and deserted aspect of the vice-regal residence, comports with the degraded state of this once patrician locality, now ‘‘ fallen on evil days and evil tongues.’’ It has long been entirely shut up, defying as completely dl attempts at investigating its interior, as when Queen’s m n and King’s men were fighting in the High Street, and Kirkaldy of Grange was bent on driving the Regent and all his followers from the town. The evidence of this mansion having been occupied by the Regent Morton is not complete, though it is undoubtedly of an earlier date, and appears to have been possessed by. his immediate ancestors. The earliest title which we have 6een is a disposition by Archibald Douglaa, younger of Whittinghame, one of the senators of the College of Justice, in which it is described as “that tenement which was some time the Earl of Mortoun’s.’’ From this it may be inferred to have been the residence of his direct ancestor, John, second Earl of Morton, who sat in the Parliament of James IV. in 1504,’ and whose grandson, William Douglas of Whittinghame was created a senator of the College of Justice in 1575. He was a contemporary of his kins- . The ancient tenement at the head of Monteith’s Close bore the date 1562, with an inscription over the doorway Ante, p. 138. of a remarkably fine inner turnpike, but it waa demolished several years before the one in Blackfriars’ Wynd. a Douglae’a Peerage, vol. ii. p. 269. ......

Book 10  p. 286
(Score 0.64)

70 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. meanwhile, the deacons of the corporations were summoned to the rescue of the Provost and Bailies, ‘‘ but they past to their four-hour’s penny, or afternoon’s pint,’’ returning for answer, that since tiley wilt de magistrates alone, let them rule alone! The Provost was compelled at last to seek the mediation of the Governor of the Castle, but the rioters did not disperse, nor permit the magistrates to escape from durance, until after nine o’clock at night, when a public proclamation was made at the Cross, engaging that they should not pursue any one for that day’s work.’ On the 19th of August 1561, Queen Mary landed at Leith, where she was received by the Lord James, her natural brother, and many of the chief nubility; and conveyed in state to the Abbey of Holyrood House. On the news of her arrival, the nobility and leaders, without distinction of party, crowded to Edinburgh, to congratulate her on her return to her native land, and tender their homage and service, while the people testified their pleasure by bonfires and music, and other popular demonstrations of rejoicing. Magnificent entertainments were provided by the town of Edinburgh, as well as by the chief nobility, and everything waa done on her arrival to assure her of the perfect loyalty and affection of her subjects ; yet, if we may believe Brantome, an eye-witness, the Queen could not help contrasting, with a sigh, the inferiority of the national displays on her arrival, when contrasted with the gorgeous pageants to which she had been accustomed at the Court of France.’ Contrary to what had been anticipated, the Queen received the Lord James into special favour, and admitted him to the chief control in all public affairs ; but notwithstanding the countenance shown to him, and other leaders of the Congregation, the religious differences speedily led to dissensions between the Queen and the people. All toleration had been denied to those who still adhered to the old faith, and both priests and laymen were strictly enjoined by the magistrates of Edinburgh to attend the services of the Protestant Chrches. Some of them, instead of joining in the worship, had availed themselves of this compulsory attendance to unsettle the faith of recent converts, on which account they were ordered by proclamation to depart from the city within forty-eight hours. The Queen remonstrated without effect, and the proclamation was renewed with increased rigour; whereupon she addressed a letter to the Council and community of Edinburgh, commanding them to assemble in the Tolbooth, and choose other magistrates in their stead. The Council obeyed her commands, without waiting to learn whom she would recommend for their successors,-a procedure which excited her indignation little less than the contempt of the magistrates she had deposed.’ Shortly after this, Knox visited the Queen at Holyrood, and had a long interview with her, during which he moved her to tears by,the vehemence of his exhortations. The Lord James and other two courtiers were present, but they withdrew sufficiently to permit of perfect privacy in this first conference between the Reformer and Queen Mary. The interview was long, and the Queen s&ciently patient under his very plain spoken rebukes and exhortations, but they parted in the same mind as they had met; Diurnal of Occurrents, p. 284,5. Knox’s History of the Reforniation, 4to, p. 253, where the culprit ia styled Balon. * Brantome, vol. 5. p. 123. Tgtler, vol. vi. Council Register, Oct. 8, 1561. Maitland, p. 21. ......

Book 10  p. 76
(Score 0.63)

48 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. found to throw the weight of their influence into the scale of liberty and right, it is only because the interests of England chanced to tally with such views. One of the most eminent Scotsmen of this period was the celebrated Cardinal Beaton. As the head of the Scottish clergy, he was naturally opposed to the entire system of policy pursued by Henry VIII., and was mainly instrumental in preventing the promised interview between James V. and the English Monarch at York, and thereby bringing on the war, the disastrous issue of which is justly considered to have occasioned James’s death. This sudden event, as it overturned many of the schemes of the Cardinal, set him only the more zealously to devise others. Immediately thereafter, he produced a will of the late King, in which he was nominated Regent, with three of the nobility as his assistants, and which he caused forthwith to be proclaimed at the Cross of Edinburgh. Historians are generally agreed as to the forgery of this will, yet the Earl of Arran, who, next to the infant Mary, was heir to the crown, cheerfully acquiesced in its arrangement, and showed himself willing to co-operate with the Cardinal in his ambitious designs. A numerous part of the nobility, however, to whom the Cardinal was an object of detestation, as his projects were altogether incompatible with their own selfish views, soon wrought upon the imbecile Earl to desert his faction, and while the matter was still in suspense, the opportune arrival of the liberated prisoners from London, now in the pay of the English Nonarch, on the 1st of January 1543, completed his overthrow ; and, notwithstanding his having already assumed the Regency, he was set aside, and the Earl of Arran elected in his stead. The grand scheme of the English Monarch at this period, from the failure of which originated all the enmity he afterwards manifested towards Scotland, was the promotion of a marriage between hie own son, af’temrds Edward VI., and the young Queen of Scotland. On the 8th of March a Parliament assembled at Edinburgh, to which the English Monarch sent an ambassador with offers of lasting peace should they comply with his proposed alliance. The Cardinal, who saw in this the certain downfall of the Clurch, brought the whole influence of the clergy, as well as that of the Queen Dowager, Mary of Guise, to bear against it, but at the moment without effect. The Cardinal, by a vote of Parliament, was committed a prisoner to Dalkeith Castle, under the care of Lord Seton, and everything was forthwith settled with England on the most friendly terms. About the Bame time, Marcus Grymanus, patriarch of Aquileia, or, according to Lesly and others, Contareno, patriarch of Venice, arrived at Edinburgh, as the Papal Legate, commissioned to use all his influence to prevent the proposed alliance between the Scottish Queen and Prince Edward of England, and bearing the amplest promises of assistance from the Pope, in case of a rupture with that crown. ‘‘ After he had been courteously and splendidly entertained at Edinburgh bp persons of the greatest rank, he departed in the beginning of March, and was so well pleased with the reception he had met with, that wherever he went afterwards, he spoke of the magnificent civilities of the Scottish nation.” Bishop Leslie thus records a costly entertainment furnished to him in the Scottish capital. ‘‘ The Earle of Murray makand him the banquet in his house, although Bishop Keith’s History of Scotland, 1845, vol. i. p. 96. ......

Book 10  p. 52
(Score 0.63)

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 465 changes were effected in the forms of process j and the Jury Court, as a separate judicature, was abolished. Mi. Bell was appointed one of the Principal Clerks of Session in 1831, in the place of Sir Walter Scott. In 1833 he waa called upon to act as chairman of the Royal Commission to examine into the state of the Law in general. He died 33d September 1843. VI1.-WILLIAM ROSE ROBINSON, of Clermiston, in the county of Edinburgh, late Sheriff of Lanark, passed advocate in 1804. His father, George Robertson of Clermiston, was a Writer to the Signet. Prior to his being appointed to the office of Sheriff; which compelled his residence in the west country, Mr. Robinson had very good practice as an advocate. He married, 8th April 1811, Mary, second daughter of James Douglas, Esq., of Orchyarton, by whom he left several children. He died in 1834, and was succeeded as Sheriff of Lanark by Archibald Alison, Esq. VIIL-JOHN WRIGHT, lecturer on law-formerly noticed (vol. I. p, 268). 1X.-JOHN GRAHAM DALYELL, afterwards SIR J. G. DALYELKLn, ight and Baronet, the author of a valuable work on the Early Superstitions of Scotland, was born in 1778, and admitted advocate in 1797. He was the second son of the late Sir Robert Dalyell, fourth Bart. of Binns, Linlithgo-wshire, by Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Nicol Graham, Esq., of Gartmore, and early in life distinguished himself by the publication of various works illustrative of the history and poetry of his native country ; amongst which may be enumerated Fragments of Scottish History, 4to ; Scottish Poems of the Sixteenth Century, 2 vols., 12mo ; an edition of Richard Bannatyne's valuable Memorials, 8vo ; and various tracts on the Chartularies of Ancient Religious Houses in Scotland. He was also deeply versed in natural history, and gave to the world Dissertations on the Propagation of Zoophytes ; the History of the Genus Planaria ; and an edition of Spallanzani's Tracts, in 2 vols. 8170. He was successively President of the Society for encouraging the Useful Arts in Scotland, Vice-President of the Society of Antiquaries, and one of the representatives of the Fourth District in the Town-Council of Edinburgh. In the year 1837 the honour of knighthood was conferred, by letters patent under the Great Sed, for his attainments in literature. He succeeded his brother as sixth Baronet in 1841, and died 7th June 1 85 1. X.-FRANCIS JEFFREY, afterwards LORD JEFFREY. a biographical sketch, of his lordship have already appeared A Portrait, with XI.-JOHN JARDINE passed advocate in 1799. He was the only son of the late George Jardine, who was for upwards of fifty years a distinguished Professor in the University of Glasgow, and who introduced that system of practical discipline in the Philosophy Classes, for which that seminary has been since so much distinguished, and which is fully explained by the Professor in VOL. II. 30 ......

Book 9  p. 620
(Score 0.63)

244 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. dreaded. In this dilemma he had recourse to Will Armstrong, a worthy descendant of the famous mosstrooper executed by Jamev V.,-who owed to the Earl’s good fiervices his emape from a halter. Will promptly volunteered to kidnap the President on learning that he stood in his patron’s way, and watching his opportunity when Lord Durie was riding out, he entered into conversation with him, and so decoyed him to an unfrequented spot called the Figgate Whins, near Portobello, when he suddenly pulled him from his horse, muffled him in his trooper’s cloak, and rode off with the luckless judge trussed up behind him. Lord Durie was secured in the dungeon of an old castle in Annandale called the Tower of Graeme, and his horse being found on the beach, it was concluded he had thrown his rider into the sea. His friends went into mourning, his successor was appointed, the Earl won his plea, and Will was directed to set his captive at liberty. The old judge waa accordingly seized in his dark dungeon, mufHed once more in the cloak, and conveyed with such dexterity to the scene of his capture that he long entertained the belief he had’ been spirited away by witches. The joy of his friends was probably surpassed by the blank amazement of his successor, when he appeared to reclaim his old office and honours. Accident long after led to a discovery of the whole story; but in those disorderly times it was only laughed at as a fair ruse de gumre.‘ In the ballad the bold moss-trooper alights at Lord Durie’s door, and beguiles him with a message from “the fairest lady in Teviotdale.” Sir Walter, however, confesses to such ekeing and patching of the traditionary fragments of the old ballad, that we must content ourselves with the fact of the stolen President’s dwelling having stood on the site of the Heriot’s school in the Assembly Close. Of this there can be no doubt, as it ia referred to in the boundaries of various early deeds, in most of which the alley is styled Durie’s Close. The Covenant Close has already been referred to: with its interesting old land, surmounted with three crow-stepped gables, forming the most prominent feature in the range of the High Street as seeu from the south. The front lands immediately below this and the adjoining close again direct us to associations with the olden time, though only as occupying the site of what once was interesting, for fire and modern reform together have effected an entire revolution in this part of the town. Over the doorway immediately above Bell’s Wynd an escallop shell? cut upon the modern stone lintel, marks the site of the ‘‘ Clam Shell Turnpike,” an edifice associated with eminent characters, and some of the most interesting eras in Scottish history. Maitland only remarks of it, in this close there ‘( is an ancient chapel, which is still plainly to be seen by the manner of its construction, though now converted into a dwelling- 1 Chrktie’s Will, Border Minstrelsy. There is little doubt of the general truth of thia tradition. Ante, p. 93. The leading facts, though without the names, are related in Forbes’s Journal, and Scott tells UE that some old stnnzas of the ballad were current on the Border in hia youth. VIGNETTE-CIBIII Shell Turnpike, from Skena Taken down lT91. ......

Book 10  p. 265
(Score 0.63)

62 MEMORIALS OP EDINB UR GH. land, romed in the mind of Elizabeth that vindictive jealousy, which so largely contributed to all the miseries that attended the course of Mary of Scotland, from the first moment of her return to her native land. From this time forward a fatal change took place in the policy of the Queen Regent. She abandoned the moderate measures which her own natural disposition inclined her to ; she lent herself en’tirely to the ambitious projects of the French Court and the Chiefs of the house of Guise, and the immediate result was a collision between the Catholic and Protestant parties. Some concessions had been granted at the request of the Lords of the Congregation ; but now these were entirely withdrawn, a proclamation was issued for conformity of religion, and several of the leaders of the reforming party were summoned A provincial synod, worthy of notice, as the last ever held in Scotland during Roman Catholic times, was convened on the 2d of March, this year, in the Blackfriare’ Church, Edinburgh, to consult what wae required for the safety of the Church thus endangered. Resolutions were passed for the amendment of life in the clergy, and the removal of other crying abuses ; but it can hardly be wondered at that their general tone was by no means conciliatory ; the decrees of the Council of Trent were again declared obligatory ; the use of any other language than Latin, in the services of the Church, was expressly forbid ; and, by an act of this same synod, Sir David Lindsay’R writings were denounced, and ordered to be burnt.’ According to Calderwood, this, the last synod ‘of the Church, was dissolved on the 2d of May, the same day that John Knox arrived at Leith,-too striking a coincidence to be overlo~ked.~ The conducting of the public religious services in an unknown language had long excited opposition ; and the popularity of such writings as those of Dunbar, Douglas, and Lindsay, in the vernacular tongue, doubtless tended to increase the general desire for its u8e in the services of the Church, as well as on all public occasions. In Kitteis Confeessioun, a satirical poem ascribed to Sir David Lindsay, the dog-lath of an ignorant father-confeseor is alluded to with sly humourto answer for their past deeds.‘ . . I He speirit monie strange case, How that my lufe did me embrace, Quhat day, how oft, quhat sort, and quhair 1 Quod he, I wad I had been thair. He me absolvit for ane plack, Thocht he with me na price wald rnak ; And rnekil Latine did he mummill; I heard na thing bot Aumrnill burnmill. The poet was already in his grave when his writings were thus condemned. The last years of hie life had been spent in retirement, and the exact time of his death is unknown, but‘Henry Charteris, the famous printer, who published Lindsay’s works in 1568, says that This occurred in 1558, from which it may be inferred, that he died towards the cloae of the previous year, 1557.4 shortly after the death of Sir David, they burnt auld Walter Mill.” 1 Tytler, vol. vi. pp 109,110. Pitscottie, vol. ii. p. 526. * Calderwood, vol. i. p. 438. ’ Chalmera’ Sir D. Lindsay, vol. i p. 42. Keith, vol. i p. 156. ......

Book 10  p. 67
(Score 0.63)

58 MEMORIALS OF EDINBURGH. hands, whatever might be the feelings of a few interested partizans of the Regent Arran. In the midst of these transactions, and while the Queen Dowager was skilfully arranging for the transference of the government into her own hands, the death of Edward VI. had created a total change in the neighbouring kingdom, and rendered the position and future line of policy to be pursued by Scotland in its intercourse with England altogether difFeren t. Probably, no ruler ever assumed the reins of government in Scotland with such general approbation of the people as the Queen Regent now did. She had already manifested both skill and judgment in attaining the Regency. She had secured it, although a decided Catholic, with the full concurrence of the Protestant party; and while, by her prudent concessions to them, she had won their favour, she had managed this with such skill as in no way to alienate from her the powerful Catholic party, among whose leaders were some of the chief men of learning and ability at the Scottish Court. But it has ever, even with the wisest rulers, proved a more dacult thing to maintain authority than to acquire it. To the peoplerindeed, any government capable of securing to them the free exercise of their rights, and curbing the licentious turbulence of the nobles, must have proved a change for the better. Yet, in her very first proceedings, she attacked one of the most deeply-rooted national prejudices, at once disgusting the nobility, and exciting the jealousy of the people,-by placing many of the most important offices of state in the hands of foreigners, and rousing a spirit of opposition to the government which led to the most fatal results. Meanwhile, the Regent devoted herself sedulously to the promotion of peace. A cordial union was established with England, and a Parliament assembled at Edinburgh, June 20th, 1555, many of whose enactment8 were well calculated to promote the interests of the nation. One of them, however, entitled “ An Act anent the speaking evil of the Queen’s Grace, or French-men,” affords evidence not only that the jealousy occasioned by the presence of the foreign troops was unabated, but that the unpopularity of her auxiliaries was already extending to the Queen Regent. Several of the new statutes are directed to restrain the laxity of the people in their religious observances. One is entitled “ Anent eating of flesh in Lentron (Lent) and other daies forbidden.” Another of these Acts ‘‘ Anent Robert Hude and abbot of Un-reason,” exhibits symptoms of the spirit of jealous reform, that was now influencing both parties on every question in the remotest degree affecting religion. It is the first attack on those ancient games and festivals, which this spirit of reform succeeded at length in banishing entirely from Scotland. The Act prohibits, under severest penalties, the choosing any such personage as Robin Hood, Little John, abbot of Un-reason, or Queen of May; and adds (‘ if onie weomen or others, a6out wmmer trees singing, make perturbation to the Queen’s lieges, the weomen perturbatoures sal1 be taken, handled, and put upon the cuck-stules of every burgh or toune. ’” It may well be regretted by others, besides the antiquary, that the singing about summer trees, as it is poetically expressed, should have excited the jealousy of any party, as detrimental to the interests of religion. . Scots Acta, vol. i. p. 294. 9 Ibid, vol. i. p. 307. ......

Book 10  p. 63
(Score 0.63)

  Previous Page Previous Results   Next Page More Results

  Back Go back to Edinburgh Bookshelf

Creative Commons License The scans of Edinburgh Bookshelf are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.